Wild Alone

About

Wild Alone is a single player and multiplayer role playing game. It was developed by Wild Alone 21 and was released on May 19, 2025. It received neutral reviews from players.

In "Wild Alone," players are stranded on a dinosaur-infested island and must fight to survive. The game features third-person action as players explore dangerous landscapes, capture and train dinosaurs to aid in their escape, and outsmart deadly creatures. It's a thrilling adventure for those who love dinosaur-themed games and survival challenges.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+12

Skip User Reviews

51%

Audience ScoreBased on 37 reviews

grinding4 negative mentions

The game has a fun and engaging early access experience that encourages players to explore and discover bugs.
Graphics and overall aesthetics are appealing, with a good day/night cycle and functional interfaces.
The game shows potential for improvement and could become a solid survival experience with further development.

The game is poorly optimized, leading to frequent frame rate drops and overheating issues on some systems.
Many features are lacking, including a tutorial, diverse animations, and a sufficient amount of content, making it feel incomplete.
There are concerns about the game's future development, with some players feeling it may be abandoned by the developer.

graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics are generally considered good, reminiscent of "Ark," but users report frequent frame rate drops, even on high-end hardware like the RTX 3080, particularly after resource collection. The limited graphic settings do not seem to alleviate these performance issues.
- “Graphics overall = good (ARK-like)”
- “Graphics overall = good (ARK-like)”
- “I was experiencing constant frame rate drops with an RTX 3080, regardless of the graphic settings I selected, especially after collecting resources.”
- “I was experiencing constant frame rate drops with an RTX 3080, regardless of the graphic settings I selected, especially after collecting resources.”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect somewhat tedious, particularly due to the inability to easily change the third-person view, though they eventually adapt. Additionally, they emphasize the importance of checking the surroundings before and after farming for dinosaurs to enhance the experience.
- “Grinding feels tedious and repetitive, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
- “The constant need to farm resources can become a chore rather than an enjoyable part of gameplay.”
- “The grind for materials often overshadows the fun aspects of the game, leading to burnout.”
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is plagued by numerous bugs and glitches, leading to a perception of it being a "buggy mess" and an asset flip from a developer with a history of abandoning projects. Despite these issues, players find it still playable and believe it can provide some enjoyment, particularly in a social setting.
- “It's a complete buggy mess of an asset flip by a dev who is known for abandoning games, Afterinfection being one of them.”
- “It's a complete buggy mess of an asset flip by a dev who is known for abandoning games, Afterinfection being one of them.”
- “It's got bugs and glitches and stuff that needs work, but it is still very playable and I can see friends having some fun with this title.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is widely criticized for its poor optimization, with multiple users highlighting significant performance issues.
- “To begin with, it is very poorly optimized.”
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The gameplay features building mechanics that are comparable to those found in other games, suggesting a familiar experience for players accustomed to this genre.
- “The building mechanics feel too similar to other games, lacking originality.”
- “Gameplay is hindered by building mechanics that don't offer anything new.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The story is characterized as sad, with users noting a sense of inevitability regarding its outcome, particularly in light of the developer's abandonment of the project. This sentiment suggests a deeper commentary on the game's narrative and its connection to the developer's actions.
- “It's a sad story, but alas we should understand this outcome since the developer also abandoned the project.”