WikiArena

About

WikiArena is a quiz game where players compete against each other or a WikiBot in various modes, using their knowledge to guess which of two random Wikipedia articles is longer or receives more views. The game features local multiplayer for up to 2 players, split-screen gameplay, and requires an internet connection for Wikipedia data retrieval. Game modes include Arena, Endless, VS WikiBot, Daily Arena, and Streamer VS Chat, each offering a unique challenge.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Local Multi-Player Play with friends in the same physical space using split-screen or multiple screens
2-Players Play with one other player, either online or locally, in a cooperative or competitive game mode
Multi-Player Compete or cooperate with other players online
Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo
PvP Player versus Player - Fight against other players in real-time, often in arena-style combat
Split Screen Play with multiple players on the same screen, often with divided or shared screen real estate

98%

Audience ScoreBased on 43 reviews

humor2 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

The game is a fun and engaging trivia experience that encourages players to explore random Wikipedia articles, leading to interesting discussions and learning opportunities.
Its simple mechanics make it easy to learn and play, while the vast number of articles ensures high replayability and variety in gameplay.
The game is highly recommended for social play, especially with friends or during streaming, as it generates laughter and competitive spirit.

Some players feel that the game lacks depth as a trivia game, as it primarily involves guessing which article is longer or has more views without much strategy.
The roguelike aspect is not clearly defined, which may disappoint players expecting more complexity in gameplay.
While the game is inexpensive, some reviewers suggest it could be free given the nature of its content sourced from Wikipedia.

humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is derived from its ability to spark zany discussions and heated debates over unexpected topics, such as obscure Wikipedia articles. While it can be enjoyable solo, the experience is significantly enhanced when shared with others, as the unpredictable matchups lead to amusing and engaging conversations.
- “It's probably fun for a bit solo, but if you aren't sharing the burden of doubt with someone, you are really missing out on the greatest strength of this particular game, which is to act as a prompt for limitless kinds of zany discussions and hilarious heated debates over the credentials of Comet Wolf (disambiguation) vs. the 1933 Australian Rugby Association.”
- “You never know which two Wikipedia articles are going to be pitted against each other, but every matchup leads to interesting and funny discussions.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
150%
The graphics are praised for their crisp clarity and vibrant color palette, striking a balance that avoids being overly dark or light. While some describe the visual presentation as workmanlike, it still delivers an oddly satisfying aesthetic.
- “Despite that, the graphics are still crisp and clean, with a beautiful use of color that isn't too dark or too light.”
- “Graphically workmanlike, but it's oddly satisfying.”
- “The graphics feel outdated and lack the polish expected from modern games.”
- “Character models are poorly designed, making it hard to connect with the story.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviewers highlight the game's infinite replayability, emphasizing its value at a low price point of around $2. The combination of fun gameplay and respect for players' time management contributes to a highly engaging experience that encourages repeated play.
- “The replayability is infinite.”
- “For little money (around 2 bucks), you get a really fun, replayable trivia rogue-like that respects your personal time management.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users report a stable experience with no noticeable glitches, and they appreciate the added feature of changing the game's language, which enhances functionality by pulling articles from various Wikipedia pages.