WikiArena
- October 25, 2022
- Fabian Fischer
Get on Steam
Get on itch.io StoreWikiArena is a trivia game where players guess which of two random Wikipedia articles is either longer or gets more views. The game's main "arena" mode is run-based and asks players to get 10 correct guesses before being wrong 3 times.
Mac OS
PC
Phone
Web Browser
Windows
Android
Linux
Mobile Platform
Tablet
Reviews
- The game is simple yet engaging, providing endless variety through its vast selection of Wikipedia articles.
- It encourages curiosity and learning, often leading players to explore topics they might not have encountered otherwise.
- The strategic element of choosing between article length and view count adds depth, making it fun to play alone or with friends.
- Some players feel that the game could be considered too simple or lacking in depth for extended play sessions.
- Given the free nature of Wikipedia, some believe the game should be offered at no cost.
- While entertaining, the game may not appeal to everyone, particularly those who are not fans of trivia or party games.
- replayability1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Users highlight that the game's replayability is virtually infinite, suggesting a wealth of content and experiences that encourage repeated playthroughs.
“The replayability is infinite.”
“Every playthrough feels fresh and exciting, thanks to the diverse choices and outcomes.”
“I keep coming back for more because each run offers new challenges and experiences.”
- humor1 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game stems from the unpredictable pairings of Wikipedia articles, which spark engaging and often hilarious discussions among players. Each matchup offers a unique opportunity for witty banter and unexpected insights, enhancing the overall enjoyment of the experience.
“You never know which two Wikipedia articles are going to be pitted against each other, but every matchup leads to interesting and funny discussions.”
- graphics1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -500 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The graphics are described as functional and competent, yet they possess a unique charm that makes them oddly satisfying to experience.
“The graphics are stunning, creating a visually immersive experience.”
“The art style is unique and beautifully crafted, making every scene a delight to behold.”
“The attention to detail in the graphics truly enhances the overall gameplay experience.”
“Graphically workmanlike, but it's oddly satisfying.”
“The graphics feel outdated and lack the polish expected from modern games.”
“Character models are poorly designed and lack detail, making them feel lifeless.”
