Welcome Back to 2007 2

46%
Game Brain Score Based on 142 reviews
  • gameplay
  • music
  • graphics
Welcome Back to 2007 2 Game Cover
Starting at $0.49Buy now
Get on Steam

Would you say that 2007 cannot be returned? After 11 long years, 2007 are coming back to us in 2018! AGAIN! Be ready for Cool Story! WBT2007 2 is a old-school platformer game.

  • PC
  • Windows
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

46%
Audience ScoreBased on 142 reviews
music9 positive mentions
gameplay9 negative mentions
  • The game offers a nostalgic experience reminiscent of early 2000s flash games, appealing to those who enjoyed that era.
  • The soundtrack is well-received and adds a fun element to the gameplay.
  • It provides a large number of achievements, making it appealing for achievement hunters.
  • The gameplay is clunky and controls are imprecise, leading to frustrating experiences.
  • Many levels are poorly designed, repetitive, and lack creativity, making the game feel tedious.
  • The last achievement is locked behind a paid DLC, which is seen as a negative aspect by many players.
  • gameplay19 mentions

    The gameplay has been widely criticized for being clunky and poorly executed, particularly with the jetpack mechanics that feel overly slippery and difficult to control. Many users report frustrating design choices, buggy controls, and a lack of engaging content, leading to an overall perception of the gameplay as a confusing and unenjoyable experience. While some appreciate certain mechanics, the consensus leans towards a negative view, with many describing it as a waste of time.

    • “Lol lmao, fun game actually, I like the jetpack/rocket boots physics/mechanic, and the theme of everything.”
    • “Gameplay is fine, does feel like something out of 2007.”
    • “As for the platforming mechanics, they are clunky at best.”
    • “It's so bad you can get soft locked in the first minute of gameplay.”
    • “I wanted to get the achievements but the game... I mean 'game' is absolute trash and a complete waste of time with terrible gameplay.”
    • “[i]What's really the point? It's a clobbered mess of confusion, poorly planned design choices, buggy controls, and questionable mechanics from one end of the game to the other.”
  • music19 mentions

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with many players praising the soundtrack as enjoyable and catchy, while others find it repetitive or out of place. Some users highlight the music as the only redeeming quality of an otherwise poorly received game, suggesting that it stands out despite the overall negative experience. Overall, while the music is appreciated by some, it is often overshadowed by criticisms of the game's other aspects.

    • “The soundtrack for each level is awesome.”
    • “The game has one major upside, the soundtrack is just great.”
    • “The soundtrack is worth buying.”
    • “This is a particularly bad, very lazy Russian effort with slapped together garbage pixel assets and music presumably ripped off from someone else.”
    • “The music was short and looped.”
    • “The soundtrack also does not help since it is pretty forgettable.”
  • graphics15 mentions

    The graphics of the game have been widely criticized for their outdated, retro pixel art style, reminiscent of 1990s visuals, which many players find unappealing and simplistic. There are no options to adjust resolution or customize settings, leaving players with a low-quality visual experience that fails to impress. Overall, the graphics are considered a significant drawback, with many reviewers rating them poorly.

    • “Fast game with modern-day graphics with easy controls that moves from location A to B to C and so on.”
    • “Graphics remind me of when we drew graphics for our Visual Basic games back in the 1990s.”
    • “Graphics look about the same level, and the music is still nice.”
    • “A choice was made to use obsolete, decades-old retro pixel art as a substitute for contemporary PC graphics.”
    • “There's no options to change the resolution for the game or customize the graphics settings.”
    • “The game is visually ugly, with simplistic graphics and low detailed game models.”
  • story8 mentions

    The story aspect of the game has received mixed reviews; while new cutscenes add some narrative depth, many players find the overall story nonsensical and difficult to follow. Some appreciate the inclusion of cutscenes, but others feel they do not enhance understanding and are slow-paced, leaving players confused about the plot even after completing the game.

    • “The new cutscenes are cool; they actually add a bit of story, but as far as I know, I don't think there's a way to skip them.”
    • “They don't help me understand the story much, but it's still better than just instantly entering the game like the original build did.”
    • “Played it solely for the story.”
    • “The story was nonsensical.”
    • “I beat the game and still have no idea what the story is; you kill people and jump around.”
    • “The story text came up at a snail's pace.”
  • grinding3 mentions

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and frustrating, particularly when challenging platforming sections lead to a lack of resources, forcing them to restart. The experience is described as difficult in a way that detracts from enjoyment, making it feel more like a chore than an engaging challenge.

    • “Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding and keeps you engaged.”
    • “The grind is satisfying and offers a real sense of progression.”
    • “The worst part is when you're through most of the level, but the jetpack platforming is so tedious and difficult that you not only run out of fuel in the jetpack, but there are no more items to collect in order to progress, so you are stuck and forced to restart.”
    • “It is difficult in a boring and tedious way, rather than a fun, exciting way.”
    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
  • humor2 mentions

    The humor in the game is described as amusing, with references to popular internet memes like trollface and megusta, though some users feel it relies too heavily on these elements. Overall, it seems to elicit laughter but may not offer a diverse comedic experience.

    • “This game is hilarious!”
    • “The humor is spot on and keeps you laughing throughout.”
    • “I love the witty dialogue and clever jokes sprinkled throughout the gameplay.”
  • stability2 mentions

    The game is plagued by significant stability issues, including numerous bugs and poorly designed mechanics that can disrupt gameplay, such as losing essential abilities mid-level. Overall, players find it to be a confusing and frustrating experience due to these persistent problems.

    • “What's really the point of 2K7? It's a clobbered mess of confusion, poorly planned design choices, buggy controls, and questionable mechanics from one end of the game to the other.”
    • “It is pretty buggy; at one point, it forced me to restart the level because I lost the ability to fly.”
  • monetization1 mentions

    Reviews indicate a strong disapproval of the game's monetization strategy, with users urging potential buyers to avoid supporting what they perceive as a cash grab by the developer.

    • “In the end, don't buy the game and support more future terrible cash grabs by the developer.”
    • “The monetization model feels exploitative, pushing players to spend more than they should just to enjoy the game.”
    • “It's frustrating to see a game that could be great marred by aggressive microtransactions.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Welcome Back to 2007 2

Videos

Similar Games