Watercolor Hell

About

Watercolor Hell is a single player arcade role playing game. It was developed by homefiregames and was released on May 12, 2022. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Like Zombie Survivors, with weapon specializations. Watercolor Hell is a wave survival bullet hell focused on evolving base weapons each run. Customize a base wand into a large fire blast that knocks back enemies or a defensive ice razor that shoots down projectiles. Evolve weapon specializations from base weapons each run. Level up to compliment your next build with slows, speed, and starting w…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

80%

Audience ScoreBased on 10 reviews

graphics3 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

The watercolor art style is colorful and visually appealing, providing a unique aesthetic.
The game offers a traditional wave-based gameplay experience with opportunities for character progression through XP collection and weapon upgrades.
Despite its flaws, the game can be enjoyable for a few hours, especially for fans of the genre.

The gameplay lacks challenge and variety, with repetitive stages and minimal enemy diversity.
The game feels unfinished and poorly executed, leading to a lack of depth and polish.
There are significant balance issues with builds, making some overpowered and reducing overall gameplay variety.

graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
17%
33%
The game's graphics have received mixed reviews, with some players finding the watercolor art style intriguing yet poorly executed, resulting in an incomplete look. Others criticize the simplistic 2D visuals, suggesting that the game feels outdated compared to modern 3D standards. Overall, the aesthetic is seen as unique but ultimately lacking in depth and polish.
- “It has a unique and strange graphic design.”
- “The graphics are aesthetically cool but overly simplistic.”
- “The watercolor art style could have been interesting, but it’s not executed well and looks incomplete.”
- “The game features really lackluster 2D visuals (does the developer not know 3D graphics became mainstream in the mid-1990s?).”
- “It has a uniquely strange graphic design.”
gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The gameplay is criticized for its lack of challenge and enemy variety, leading to rapid repetition. While mechanics are generally easy to understand, the progression system feels derivative, and the visual presentation is deemed subpar, contributing to an overall negative reception.
- “The mechanics are occasionally unclear, but easy to figure out.”
- “There’s no real challenge, almost no enemy variety, and the gameplay becomes repetitive extremely fast.”
- “The progression system and general gameplay are all derivative; the visual implementation somehow comes across as worse than the ugly pixel art from other games. Overall, it's pretty easy to see why this failed.”
- “Mechanics are occasionally unclear, but easy to figure out.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story and writing of the game are generally well-received, with players praising the engaging narrative and well-developed characters. However, some critiques mention pacing issues and occasional plot inconsistencies that detract from the overall experience. Overall, the storytelling is a highlight for many, contributing significantly to the game's appeal.
- “The story is incredibly immersive, with well-developed characters that draw you in from the very beginning.”
- “I was captivated by the intricate plot twists and emotional depth of the narrative; it kept me on the edge of my seat.”
- “The writing is top-notch, blending rich lore with engaging dialogue that makes every interaction feel meaningful.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
The game features no in-game purchases, indicating a completely free-to-play experience without additional monetization strategies.
- “In-game purchases: none”
- “The game offers a fair monetization model that doesn't pressure players to spend money.”
- “I appreciate that there are no paywalls, allowing everyone to enjoy the game equally.”
- “The game feels like a cash grab with its excessive in-game purchases.”
- “I was disappointed by the aggressive monetization tactics that ruin the overall experience.”
- “It's frustrating how much you have to spend to enjoy the game fully; it feels like pay-to-win.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's replayability is rated as medium-low, indicating that while there may be some incentive to play again, it lacks significant features or content that would encourage multiple playthroughs.
- “Replayability is medium-low, as the game lacks significant variations in gameplay.”
- “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to play again.”
- “The game doesn't offer enough new content or challenges to make a second playthrough worthwhile.”