War Planet Online: MMO Game

About

"War Planet Online: MMO Game is a strategy game with a good plot and perfect gameplay, but can be very grinding with annoying ads and bugs. As the game's description states, build your army, dominate your region, and lead your faction to global conquest through perfect visuals and immersive gameplay."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

79%

Audience ScoreBased on 18,005 reviews

graphics390 positive mentions

stability93 negative mentions

graphics
547 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
71%
24%
5%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising their quality and creativity, particularly in battle scenes and world views. However, some users express disappointment with the overall graphical performance, citing issues such as low resolution, lag, and a need for more polish and realism. While many find the graphics enjoyable and a highlight of the game, others feel that improvements are necessary to enhance the overall experience.
- “The graphics are exceptional but would be nice to zoom in or rotate camera to get better view.”
- “This game has excellent graphics it's fun has many faucet for improvement.”
- “Great game, awesome graphics, I spend 4 hours a day playing this game can't stop.”
- “However, graphics and layout are below par compared to its competitors.”
- “Game is good to play and the graphics are not good during the war between two armies and it is not realistic during war and game is taking time to run on the device at first time.”
- “The graphics after the new update sucks.”
gameplay
170 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
57%
37%
6%
The gameplay is generally praised for its fun mechanics, smooth controls, and engaging graphics, making it enjoyable for players. However, there are notable criticisms regarding lag, balance issues, and the prevalence of pay-to-win elements, which detract from the overall experience. Some players also express a desire for more real-time combat mechanics and improvements in game design to enhance gameplay depth and reduce frustration.
- “Gameplay is amazing.”
- “Great game, loved it all the experience and controls and gameplay and the graphics are amazing.”
- “Support is fast, gameplay is smooth and easy to learn, and the in-game rewards for PvP events are well worth the time and research it takes to build a large and powerful army.”
- “It's got a lot of the trimmings of a great game: superb design, barely if any bugs, and pretty graphics, but it's also got a lot of the shortcomings many games with similar mechanics have.”
- “Graphics are okay, but there is no real substance to gameplay; it's very lackluster.”
- “Gameplay is boring.”
stability
94 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
3%
99%
The stability of the game is heavily criticized, with numerous reports of persistent glitches, freezing issues, and poor customer support. Players frequently experience interruptions during gameplay, particularly during transitions between screens and in chat functions, leading to frustration over lost progress and resources. Overall, the game's stability issues detract significantly from the user experience, with many players expressing disappointment in the lack of effective fixes from the developers.
- “The game runs smoothly without any crashes or glitches.”
- “I've experienced consistent performance, making it a joy to play.”
- “The stability of the game allows me to fully immerse myself without interruptions.”
- “World at Arms is still unfinished and extremely buggy. I've played it with my grandad for 3-4 years and it's still the same.”
- “The game glitches and they do not do anything to correct it, even after bringing it to their attention.”
- “Great game, however, too many glitches they do not fix and when you report to Gameloft, they sometimes fix an issue then say there was never an issue to not compensate for your losses.”
monetization
69 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
28%
64%
The monetization strategy of the game has received significant criticism, with many users labeling it a "cash grab" due to high prices for in-app purchases and an overwhelming number of microtransactions. Players report issues with ads, including deceptive promotions and unfulfilled rewards, alongside frustrations over non-functional purchase options. Overall, while some enjoy the gameplay, the monetization practices detract from the experience, leading to a negative perception among users.
- “There are no ads (from what I can tell), and it is much better than mobile strike and it isn't pay to win!”
- “Even I did some in-app purchases.”
- “Only thing I have to say is the in-game purchase is a bit crazy.”
- “There are in-game purchases and the price jumps quickly as Gameloft is greedy.”
- “All they want is for you to make in-game purchases and yet not provide a game that works properly.”
- “Paid $30 in in-app purchase just to have it disappear; where is my refund?”
story
51 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
31%
63%
6%
The game's story is generally well-received, with players appreciating its engaging narrative and graphics, which enhance the overall gameplay experience. However, there are calls for more depth in storytelling, additional side missions, and better rewards for completing missions. Some users have reported technical issues that hinder their progress, detracting from the enjoyment of the story.
- “Great game, easy control and good story.”
- “This is the best game of 2018. I love the gameplay; it's smooth, and I enjoy the graphics and storyline.”
- “Its actually got a good storyline and great graphics.”
- “Need a better story.”
- “Need more storytelling and narration, instead of just mindlessly troop deployment for no plausible reason whatsoever.”
- “So boring, no mission.”
grinding
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express frustration with the grinding aspect of the game, noting that resource farming is tedious and often feels futile without sufficient shields or medals. Many feel that the extensive time required for upgrades and the influence of gold farming detracts from the overall experience, making the game feel more like a chore than an enjoyable activity. Additionally, the lack of meaningful communication options within factions adds to the tedium of the grinding process.
- “All your effort on farming will be useless if you're out of shield or medal.”
- “This game is okay if you want to kill time, but that's the only use this game actually has. If you want to upgrade something, you have to grind like hell to be able to do so. Just upgrading one building pretty much bankrupts you, so you spend most of the game just grinding for resources. Another thing to note is the inventory; if you have a load of inventory and you say you have a thousand but you only want to use 10 or 30, instead you get nothing or a ridiculous number above it. There's no in-between.”
- “Plus, parallel farming is a big problem; they might as well call it FarmVille with tanks and not tractors.”
optimization
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
20%
30%
The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its smooth performance and graphics, while others report significant lag and performance issues, particularly on older devices. Frequent updates have been noted, but they seem to have negatively impacted basic performance for some users. Overall, while the gameplay is highly regarded, optimization remains a concern that developers need to address.
- “Great game, awesome gameplay with perfect performance and graphics. Easy to control and a very enjoyable experience; you can relax and play, and when the action begins, you hold your breath.”
- “Great game, cool how they use the world map as conquerable areas and great graphics; runs smoothly.”
- “Game updates are coming more often, and the basic performance is getting worse.”
- “Excellent gameplay, but one issue that I hate: it lags so much on my device. This game shouldn't be that hard to handle, so there are some optimization issues here. Hope you fix this soon.”
- “And performance is not as I expected.”
humor
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
78%
22%
The humor in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players finding it genuinely funny and enjoyable, while others feel it falls flat and lacks comedic value. Additionally, there is a sense of irony expressed by players who feel they have invested significantly in the game, only to be disappointed by its humor.
- “Great funny game, I love it!”
- “Laughing... seriously, please!”
- “The funny thing is, I spent 400 dollars on this game from the start.”
- “Not funny 😒 game”
- “Not funny 😒 game”
music
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
50%
17%
Players generally find the music in the game to be good, but there are requests for specific enhancements, such as adding a siren sound during significant events like nuclear attacks. Overall, while the music is appreciated, there is a desire for more thematic elements to enhance the gameplay experience.
- “So far so good, graphics are okay, music is good, gameplay is okay.”
- “I would like to request to the producer of this game to please add background music like when the nuclear attack comes there is a siren, so please add that siren while on the big attack like seize the world HQ in the next update.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is described as heartwarming, evoking strong emotional responses that resonate with players, though some may find it leaves them feeling more reflective or melancholic.
- “This is a very nice and heartwarming game.”