War Planet Online: MMO Game
Get on Play Store"War Planet Online: MMO Game is a strategy game with a good plot and perfect gameplay, but can be very grinding with annoying ads and bugs. As the game's description states, build your army, dominate your region, and lead your faction to global conquest through perfect visuals and immersive gameplay."
Reviews
- The game has great graphics and is visually appealing.
- It offers a lot of strategic gameplay and opportunities for players to grow.
- The community aspect is strong, allowing players to connect and work together in factions.
- The game is heavily pay-to-win, making it difficult for free players to compete.
- There are frequent bugs and glitches, particularly with the chat system and loading times.
- Players often experience issues with account recovery and customer service is unresponsive.
- graphics263 mentions
- 71 % positive mentions
- 24 % neutral mentions
- 5 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising their quality and creativity, describing them as beautiful and superior. However, some users report issues such as poor performance after updates, slow loading times, and a desire for more realistic visuals. Overall, while the graphics are generally well-received, there are calls for improvements and enhancements to address stability and detail.
“The graphics are exceptional but would be nice to zoom in or rotate camera to get a better view.”
“Great game, awesome graphics, I spend 4 hours a day playing this game, can't stop.”
“The graphics are amazing and I love how factions can control land.”
“Update 1/9/19 my graphics are terrible.”
“The graphics after the new update sucks.”
“This has worse graphics than the oldest console game.”
- gameplay83 mentions
- 58 % positive mentions
- 36 % neutral mentions
- 6 % negative mentions
The gameplay is generally well-received, with many players praising its smoothness, ease of learning, and engaging mechanics. However, some users express concerns about balance issues, lag, and the prevalence of pay-to-win elements, which detract from the overall experience. While the graphics are often highlighted as a strong point, there are calls for improvements in certain mechanics and optimizations to enhance gameplay further.
“Support is fast, gameplay is smooth and easy to learn, and the in-game rewards for PvP events are well worth the time and research it takes to build a large and powerful army.”
“Great game, awesome gameplay with perfect performance and graphics. Easy to control and a very enjoyable experience; you can relax and play, and when action begins, you hold your breath.”
“Beautiful graphics and captivating gameplay!”
“It's got a lot of the trimmings of a great game: superb design, barely any bugs, and pretty graphics, but it's also got a lot of the shortcomings many games with similar mechanics have.”
“Phone app is a poor version of the PC app: no color on overdrives, no voice notifications, random disconnects, persistent lag problems requiring game reload, in-game chat lockups, sloppy scrolling in menus... but if you can work through all this, it's a fun game that deserves far better attention to mechanics.”
“Gameplay is boring.”
- stability47 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The game suffers from significant stability issues, with numerous players reporting persistent bugs, glitches, and freezing problems that disrupt gameplay. Many users express frustration over lost progress and resources due to these technical issues, compounded by slow and unhelpful customer support. While some enjoy the game, the overwhelming consensus highlights that the stability problems detract from the overall experience.
“World at Arms is still unfinished and extremely buggy. I've played it with my grandad for 3-4 years and it's still the same.”
“It was fun to play for a while, but now it is getting worse and the support team clearly doesn't care or want to help. People are losing everything they build because of the glitches, and the support takes a long time to respond and fix issues.”
“Horrible glitches cost you everything you've built.”
- monetization34 mentions
- 9 % positive mentions
- 26 % neutral mentions
- 65 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game has received significant criticism, with many players labeling it a "cash grab" due to excessive in-game purchases and intrusive ads. Users report issues with in-app purchases not functioning properly and express frustration over the high costs associated with microtransactions. While some players appreciate the absence of ads in certain contexts, the overall sentiment leans towards dissatisfaction with the monetization practices, which detract from the gaming experience.
“Even I did some in-app purchases.”
“There are no ads (from what I can tell), and it is much better than Mobile Strike and it isn't pay to win!”
“Only thing I have to say is the in-game purchase is a bit crazy.”
“Have a look at the description of their last update... and you can easily realize what a cash grab this game is.”
“There are in-game purchases and the price jumps quickly as Gameloft is greedy.”
“All they want is for you to make in-game purchases and yet not provide a game that works properly.”
- story23 mentions
- 30 % positive mentions
- 65 % neutral mentions
- 4 % negative mentions
The game's story has received mixed feedback, with some players appreciating its engaging narrative and mission variety, while others criticize it for lacking depth and coherence. Many users express a desire for improved storytelling elements and better mission reward systems, highlighting technical issues that hinder their experience. Overall, while the storyline is seen as a positive aspect, there is a consensus that it could benefit from more development and clearer narrative structure.
“Better than the other games like Clash of Clans; it has a storyline!”
“Great game, easy controls, and a good story.”
“This is the best game of 2018! I love the gameplay; it's smooth, and I enjoy the graphics and storyline.”
“So boring, no mission.”
“Need a better story.”
“Need more storytelling and narration, instead of just mindlessly troop deployment for no plausible reason whatsoever.”
- grinding9 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Players express significant frustration with the grinding mechanics in the game, noting that resource farming is excessively time-consuming and often feels unrewarding, particularly when upgrading buildings can lead to resource depletion. The tedious nature of construction times and inventory management further compounds the issue, making the overall experience feel like a chore rather than an engaging gameplay element. While some enjoy the game, many feel that the grinding aspect detracts from its potential enjoyment.
“This game is okay if you want to kill time, but that's the only use this game actually has. If you want to upgrade something, you have to grind like hell to be able to do so. Just upgrading one building pretty much bankrupts you, so you spend most of the game just grinding for resources. Another thing to note is the inventory; if you have a load of inventory and you say you have a thousand but you only want to use 10 or 30 instead, you get nothing or a ridiculous number above it. There's no in-between.”
“All your effort on farming will be useless if you're out of shield or medals.”
“Literally a week's worth of grinding.”
- optimization5 mentions
- 60 % positive mentions
- 40 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Overall, the game's optimization is a mixed bag; while many players praise its smooth performance and impressive graphics, some users report significant lag and performance issues on certain devices, indicating a need for further optimization.
“Great game, awesome gameplay with perfect performance and graphics. Easy to control and a very enjoyable experience; you can relax and play, and when the action begins, you hold your breath.”
“Great game! Cool how they use the world map as conquerable areas and great graphics. Runs smoothly.”
“Excellent gameplay! The game runs smoothly and has great graphics.”
“Excellent gameplay, but one issue that I hate: it lags so much on my device. This game shouldn't be that hard to handle, so there are some optimization issues here. Hope you fix this soon.”
“The performance is not as I expected.”
- humor5 mentions
- 80 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 20 % negative mentions
The humor in the game receives mixed reactions, with some players finding it genuinely funny and enjoyable, while others feel it falls flat or is overshadowed by frustration over its cost. Overall, the humor seems to elicit a range of responses, from amusement to disappointment.
“Great funny game, I love it!”
“Laughing... seriously, please!”
“Funny thing is, I spent 400 dollars on this game from the start.”
“Not funny 😒 game”
“The jokes fell flat and felt forced.”
“I expected more laughs, but it was mostly cringeworthy.”
- music4 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 75 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Players generally appreciate the music in the game, noting it as a positive aspect alongside the graphics and gameplay. However, there are suggestions for improvement, such as adding specific sound effects like a siren during significant events, which could enhance the overall experience.
“So far so good, graphics are okay, music is good, gameplay is okay.”
“I would like to request the producer of this game to please add background music, like a siren during a nuclear attack, especially during significant events like seizing the world HQ in the next update.”
- emotional2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The emotional aspect of the game elicits mixed feelings, with some players finding it heartwarming and uplifting, while others report it made them feel worse about certain issues. Overall, it appears to evoke a strong emotional response, whether positive or negative.
“This is a very nice and heartwarming game.”
