Skip to main content

War of Nations: PvP Strategy

War of Nations: PvP Strategy Game Cover
59%Game Brain Score
graphics, gameplay
stability, monetization
59% User Score Based on 1,540 reviews

Platforms

TabletAndroidPhoneMobile Platform
Buy NowGet on Play Store
War of Nations: PvP Strategy Game Cover

About

War of Nations: PvP Strategy is a single player strategy game. It received neutral reviews from players.

Expand your army with modern tanks and powerful commanders to defeat your rivals

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
War of Nations: PvP Strategy screenshot
War of Nations: PvP Strategy screenshot
War of Nations: PvP Strategy screenshot
War of Nations: PvP Strategy screenshot
War of Nations: PvP Strategy screenshot
Skip User Reviews

59%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,540 reviews
graphics11 positive mentions
stability85 negative mentions
  • The game offers a fun and addictive gameplay experience, especially when played with an active alliance.
  • The graphics and strategic elements of the game are well-designed, making it enjoyable for players who appreciate strategy games.
  • The developers have made improvements over time, and the community aspect allows players to connect with others globally.
  • The game has significant lag issues and frequent glitches, making it frustrating to play and often unresponsive.
  • It has become heavily pay-to-win, with players needing to spend large amounts of money to remain competitive, which discourages free-to-play users.
  • Customer support is lacking, with many players reporting unhelpful responses and unresolved issues regarding in-game purchases and technical problems.
  • stability
    85 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is severely compromised by a multitude of persistent glitches and bugs, leading to frequent freezes and crashes that disrupt gameplay. Players report inadequate customer support and a lack of effective resolutions to these issues, resulting in frustration and a declining player base. Overall, the game's technical problems overshadow its potential, making it a frustrating experience for many users.

    • “Too many glitches; each time you get hit, you have to reload the game to be able to move your army.”
    • “Don't waste your time and money on this game. The platform is unstable, and when you need to attack, it just freezes. There are many other games that offer a much better experience; this one is outdated and not worth your time.”
    • “Game has constant lag and glitches that ruin progress made.”
  • graphics
    19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, players have mixed feelings about the graphics in the game. While many appreciate the visual quality and find them enjoyable, there are frequent calls for improvements, particularly in battle graphics and user interface. Some users also express frustration with lag and the high cost of in-game events, suggesting that while the graphics are good, they could be significantly enhanced.

    • “Thanks to the dev, it has great gameplay and graphics. It's a perfect time killer! I love the PvP and the rewards; you can review the battles. Awesome online game.”
    • “It's so nice, very good graphics, and it is a very addictive game with very cool units!”
    • “It's amazing how the graphics are really nice.”
    • “I would love to see this game redone with new graphics and UIs.”
    • “The graphics definitely could be improved.”
    • “Must be played online, poor graphics and a waste of time.”
  • gameplay
    13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is generally enjoyable, featuring engaging mechanics like base building and PvP, but is marred by significant issues such as server lag, frequent glitches, and a perceived pay-to-win model. While some players appreciate the depth and strategy involved, many express frustration over connectivity problems and the lack of support from developers, leading to a mixed overall experience.

    • “I'd love this game, I really enjoyed the base building mechanic, but the amount of buffs in this game is incredible. You can stack up thousands of percentages from alliances, research, operations, and commanders, allowing you to take down an army with just 1/100th the size of theirs.”
    • “Thanks to the developers, it has great gameplay and graphics. It's a perfect time killer! I love the PvP and the rewards you can earn from reviewing the battles. It's an awesome online game.”
    • “I love the gameplay; it's not fully pay-to-play. There are ways to be a top player without spending money, as long as you invest enough time and strategy.”
    • “Server lag makes gameplay impossible and there is no support for players or updates to resolve issues or provide compensation.”
    • “There are too many glitches that go unresolved, making gameplay miserable at times.”
    • “This game offers only a small portion of what it claims in the way of gameplay.”
  • monetization
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized as excessively focused on in-app purchases, leading many players to label it a "cash grab." Users report that the game is heavily pay-to-win, with essential items locked behind expensive microtransactions, and express frustration over poor customer support regarding purchase issues. Overall, the monetization approach detracts from the gameplay experience, with many calling for a reduction in microtransactions to improve the game.

    • “Extremely pay to win, but it's very fun. Perhaps the game could improve by lessening the microtransactions.”
    • “The gameplay was fine until more items that can be obtained through in-app purchases were introduced.”
    • “This game can be a cash grab.”
    • “The developer has blatantly made it so that anything that would be helpful or beneficial can only be obtained via in-app purchase.”
    • “Now the game has in-app purchases everywhere and lags... I remember the game when it was young and much better.”
  • story
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect is criticized for being overshadowed by technical issues, such as lag during events that hinder gameplay and reward collection. Players feel that the narrative is limited by the focus on monetization and competition, particularly for those not willing to spend money, while also expressing frustration over unresponsive customer support. Despite these challenges, there is a continuous flow of missions and content to engage with, keeping players occupied.

    • “Waste of time emailing them with game issues, they won't respond with the fix...they'll respond with the same story, we're working on the issue.”
    • “Limited missions have become all coining; it is somewhat possible to play without money but no way to protect against the big spenders unless you are in a top alliance.”
    • “You're never left with something not to do in the game either with new missions, new units or commanders to grind for, or just wanting to be #1.”
  • grinding
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and time-consuming, often requiring significant investment of time or money to progress. Many express frustration with the lack of new content and the challenges of upgrading without spending, leading to a sense of stagnation in gameplay. Overall, while the game has potential, the grinding mechanics can detract from the overall experience.

    • “It's a good game, but there are a few things you need to know. Just fight people on your level and don't harass others. This is a grinding game, and you're going to be here for a while. One thing I wish from PopReach is a better report system because I have someone who has been inactive for 5 months and promised me the leadership of the alliance. I reached out to PopReach support, and he won't reply back.”
    • “Game needs new content; nobody plays anymore. Combining multiple commanders is tedious unless you pay for them.”
    • “As with so many other games, it gets tedious to expand and upgrade without having to spend actual money.”
  • optimization
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has seen notable improvements recently, with some players praising the enhancements in performance and customer service. However, there are still significant concerns regarding the responsiveness of the developers, particularly Gree, who have been criticized for poor support and unresolved performance issues, leading to player dissatisfaction and a decline in the player base. Overall, while progress has been made, there remains a divide in user experiences regarding optimization.

    • “War of Nations has greatly improved a lot these past few months. There have been improvements with bundles, so there's better value for money. The performance has improved too, and the customer service has definitely improved as well. Keep it up! 5 stars from me, guys.”
    • “Popreach has started doing a better job on the game, listening to the players and fixing performance.”
    • “If people stop throwing money at subpar performance, maybe they would fix the game instead of selling it to the next guy to make a boatload of cash instead of providing a quality product like this game deserves.”
    • “Gree doesn't listen to or help its customers; tech support and customer support are horrible, with constant canned answers. They refund or replace nothing even if justified. They added so much to the game that they have caused performance issues which they haven't fixed. The only way to survive is to spend money; everyone in the game is quitting. Save your money and time!”
    • “Popreach started doing a better job on the game, listening to the players and fixing performance.”
  • humor
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users find the humor in the game's response system, noting that leaving a positive rating prompts a funny reply, while also highlighting the irony of not receiving help despite multiple requests.

    • “That's funny; if you leave a good rating, they respond.”
    • “Funny, I've requested help dozens of times.”
  • music
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with multiple users expressing dissatisfaction and calling for improvements.

    • “This game has the worst music; please make the music better.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy War of Nations: PvP Strategy

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

War of Nations: PvP Strategy is a strategy game.

War of Nations: PvP Strategy is available on Phone, Tablet, Android and Mobile Platform.

War of Nations: PvP Strategy was developed by Garden City Games.

War of Nations: PvP Strategy has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its stability.

War of Nations: PvP Strategy is a single player game.