Skip to main content
War of Evolution Game Cover

About

War of Evolution is a single player casual strategy game. It received neutral reviews from players.

"War of Evolution" is a simulation game where players start from a simple tidal pool and evolve it into a complex civilization. The game allows players to make various decisions that will affect the growth and development of their world. It's a unique and engaging experience that puts the power of evolution and creation in the player's hands.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

60%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,078 reviews
gameplay14 positive mentions
monetization28 negative mentions

  • The game starts off with a fun and engaging cell stage reminiscent of Spore, allowing for interesting character customization.
  • The graphics and animations are well-crafted, providing a visually appealing experience.
  • The game has potential for creativity and strategy, with a variety of character customization options.
  • After the initial cell stage, the gameplay shifts dramatically to a generic city-building and strategy game, losing the essence of evolution.
  • The tutorial is excessively long and restrictive, limiting player freedom and enjoyment.
  • The game heavily relies on microtransactions, making it feel pay-to-win and frustrating for free players.
  • gameplay
    69 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay begins with an engaging spore-like experience that quickly devolves into a generic mobile strategy game, disappointing many players who were drawn in by the initial mechanics. While the early stages offer fun customization and evolution, the transition to land gameplay introduces repetitive city-building and combat mechanics that feel uninspired and overly familiar. Overall, the game suffers from a lack of coherence, with players expressing frustration over the drastic shift in gameplay style and the loss of the unique elements that initially captivated them.

    • “The gameplay seamlessly blends strategy and resource management, making each decision impactful.”
    • “Very relaxing yet engaging gameplay.”
    • “Great gameplay, lots of things to do, refreshing, one of the best games for sure.”
    • “Disappointed after the first phase, the gameplay shifted dramatically.”
    • “The land segment (aka most of the game) is so very boring and is just a mashup of several generic mobile game tropes and gameplay.”
    • “The gameplay starts like one thing, and quickly turns into a generic mobile base building kind of game.”
  • monetization
    36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing disappointment over misleading advertisements that do not accurately represent the gameplay. While there are no intrusive ads and in-app purchases are considered reasonably priced and not necessary for progression, some users feel the game leans towards a cash grab model with excessive microtransactions. Overall, players appreciate the absence of pop-up ads but criticize the game's divergence from its advertised content.

    • “The in-app purchases are very reasonably priced and rewarding, but not necessary.”
    • “There's no ads since writing this and they're not currently begging for money; it seems a bit faster-paced compared to other base builders.”
    • “I enjoy the fact there are no ads, and that you can comfortably play it without having to purchase bits to advance.”
    • “The ads were very misleading.”
    • “Doesn't deliver what's promised in the ads.”
    • “After that it's just a cash grab mobile game, disgusting.”
  • graphics
    30 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising their beauty and detail, likening them to or even surpassing those of the game "Spore." However, many users criticize the graphics for being derivative and poorly optimized, leading to performance issues such as lag and slow loading times. Overall, while the visual design is appreciated by some, it is overshadowed by concerns about functionality and originality.

    • “The graphics evolve alongside my tribe, creating a stunning journey.”
    • “It's has amazing graphics and the start is absolutely amazing.”
    • “Absolutely amazing beautiful graphics great story so much to do you'll never get bored.”
    • “It has bad, pixelated graphics, as well as very slow loading times, and a sudden and annoying tutorial.”
    • “What a waste of graphical power of today's devices.”
    • “This is not only just a copy of Spore from Maxis, but the intro segment and all graphic assets are literally ripped from the game.”
  • story
    17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating its coherence and immersive elements, while others criticize its linearity and forced progression that detracts from player agency. Many users find the tutorial excessively long and the gameplay repetitive, leading to frustration. Overall, while the graphics and potential for customization are praised, the narrative experience is seen as lacking depth and flexibility.

    • “The story is really coherent and it encourages you to engage!”
    • “With stunning graphics, immersive gameplay, and a captivating storyline, it sets a new standard in gaming excellence.”
    • “Absolutely amazing beautiful graphics great story so much to do you'll never get bored.”
    • “I get that the game is supposed to have a story, but if that's what you wanted then you shouldn't have modeled it after Spore, where you actually have a say in what you want to do.”
    • “The main issue is you're forced into every interaction; you can't do things at your own speed because you're literally forced into continuing the story.”
    • “I'm not sure if the tutorial is so freaking long or if the story is so linear.”
  • grinding
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players generally find the initial gameplay engaging, but quickly become disillusioned as the experience devolves into repetitive grinding tasks, reminiscent of farming apps. The excitement fades after a short period, leading to a tedious and unfulfilling grind that lacks meaningful rewards, ultimately making the game feel like a waste of time.

    • “Ascension is now boring and a tedious grind without any awesome rewards.”
    • “Good for the first few hours and then boring, tedious, and an utter waste of time.”
    • “That lasts for about an hour of gameplay and then you're thrust into the same grinding clan-based multiplayer drudgery that has become the bane of mobile games.”
  • stability
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The stability of the game is highly inconsistent, with many users reporting frequent glitches, freezes during battles, and installation issues that prevent the game from launching. However, a minority of players have experienced a smooth experience with no bugs or glitches. Overall, the game's stability appears to be a significant concern for many players.

    • “No bugs, no glitches; it's the best!”
    • “The game runs smoothly without any crashes.”
    • “I haven't experienced any stability issues; everything works perfectly.”
    • “It glitches you out a tremendous amount, and if you didn't save anything, you're cooked - there's also a lot of purple everywhere sometimes.”
    • “Great but freezes during battles.”
    • “Every time I try to install it, it just freezes at 100% and goes back to the install button.”
  • humor
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is widely praised, with players finding it both weird and genuinely funny, contributing to an overall enjoyable experience.

    • “It's a very weird and funny game.”
    • “Funny game, it's awesome to be real.”
  • optimization
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received mixed feedback, with some players noting that it requires high-performance mobile devices to run smoothly, even on low graphics settings. Additionally, issues such as a lengthy tutorial and a lackluster storyline have contributed to a less than perfect experience for certain users.

  • atmosphere
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere is enhanced by a thrilling soundtrack that contributes to a dynamic and immersive experience for players.

    • “The soundtrack adds to the thrill, creating a dynamic atmosphere.”
    • “The haunting visuals and ambient sounds immerse you in a world that feels alive.”
    • “Every corner of the game is filled with detail, enhancing the overall atmosphere and making exploration a joy.”
  • music
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game enhances the overall experience by creating a dynamic atmosphere that heightens the thrill of gameplay.

    • “The soundtrack adds to the thrill, creating a dynamic atmosphere.”
    • “The music perfectly complements the gameplay, enhancing every moment.”
    • “Each track is carefully crafted, immersing players in the game's world.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy War of Evolution

3h Median play time
3h Average play time
2-3h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 2 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Games Like War of Evolution

Games Like War of Evolution

Age of Frostfall ImageAge of Frostfall ImageAge of Frostfall Image
Rising: War for Dominion ImageRising: War for Dominion ImageRising: War for Dominion Image
Kingshot ImageKingshot ImageKingshot Image
Tiles Survive! ImageTiles Survive! ImageTiles Survive! Image
War and Magic: Kingdom Reborn Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

War of Evolution is a casual strategy game.

War of Evolution is available on Phone, Tablet, Android and Mobile Platform.

On average players spend around 3 hours playing War of Evolution.

War of Evolution was developed by ONEMT HONG KONG LIMITED.

War of Evolution has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its monetization.

War of Evolution is a single player game.

Similar games include Age of Frostfall, Rising: War for Dominion, Kingshot, Tiles Survive!, War and Magic: Kingdom Reborn and others.