War of Evolution

About

"War of Evolution" is a simulation game where players start from a simple tidal pool and evolve it into a complex civilization. The game allows players to make various decisions that will affect the growth and development of their world. It's a unique and engaging experience that puts the power of evolution and creation in the player's hands.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

58%

Audience ScoreBased on 247 reviews

graphics4 positive mentions

monetization4 negative mentions

The game starts off strong with a well-executed cell stage that captures the essence of Spore.
The graphics are impressive and vibrant, providing a visually appealing experience.
There are no forced ads, allowing for a more enjoyable gameplay experience.

After the initial stages, the game quickly devolves into a generic base-building and pay-to-win model, losing its unique charm.
The tutorial is excessively long and hand-holding, detracting from the overall experience.
Many players feel misled by the game's marketing, as it does not deliver the expected Spore-like gameplay beyond the first few minutes.

gameplay
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The gameplay starts strong with an engaging evolution phase reminiscent of "Spore," but quickly devolves into a generic mobile city-building experience that disappoints many players. Users express frustration over the shift from enjoyable aquatic mechanics to slow and tedious land-based gameplay, feeling that the game loses its initial charm and originality. Overall, the consensus is that the game would have benefited from maintaining the engaging elements of its early stages rather than transitioning to a more conventional strategy format.
- “I'm astonished how they show you different styles of gameplay just to ultimately turn into a generic pay-to-win city builder.”
- “I liked that intro evolution gameplay better than what happens after; it's a clone. Developers should consider making that beginning part its own game.”
- “If only it had held onto the genre of the first three minutes of gameplay.”
- “Gameplay starts like one thing, and quickly turns into a generic mobile base building kind of game.”
- “Could have been a really cool game if they stuck with the first 10 minutes of gameplay before turning it into a town builder.”
- “After the initial stage (which, in all honesty, was well made and just as fun as the same stage in Spore), the game quickly devolves into your typical online multiplayer strategy game with extremely slow and boring combat and city building mechanics.”
graphics
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
13%
38%
Overall, the graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising the art style and visual effects as impressive and comparable to titles like Spore, while others criticize the game's performance demands on mobile devices. Despite the graphical quality, some players feel that the game underutilizes the potential of modern hardware.
- “It's had amazing graphics and the start is absolutely amazing.”
- “It's Spore but a standard base builder, the graphics are surprisingly good.”
- “Great game, love the graphics.”
- “Giving it 2 stars because of the art style.”
- “What a waste of graphical power of today's devices.”
- “You need an amazing performance mobile with a high fps to play it even if you make the graphics low; it doesn't matter.”
monetization
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
13%
50%
The monetization strategy of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the absence of ads and forced payments, while others criticize it for being riddled with microtransactions and perceived pay-to-win elements. Many users express frustration over the game's reliance on in-app purchases, likening it to a cash grab, while a few acknowledge the need for developers to generate revenue. Overall, the game's monetization approach seems to be a contentious point among players.
- “There's no ads since writing this, and they are not currently begging for money. It seems a bit faster-paced compared to other base builders.”
- “It reminds me of Spore and is a great version of it. So far, no ads at all, but there will probably be some in there eventually, and I understand that they have to make money too.”
- “Also, no ads.”
- “Just make the whole game like the first part of the game instead of like a typical cash grab.”
- “Outright stealing of a whole chapter from Spore, stupid free-to-play microtransactions, and finally: your creature has to be an ugly piece of meat while you're being shown some beautifully designed creatures you can't make inside the game.”
- “Seems pay-to-win - you are bombarded with offers from every angle - I won't spend money on another cash grab mobile game.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
The story is considered strange and lacks depth, with some players finding it unengaging. Additionally, the game features repetitive quests and a lengthy tutorial that detracts from the experience. Overall, while it has its merits, the narrative and character variety leave much to be desired for some users.
- “The story is strange and intriguing, keeping me engaged throughout.”
- “The quests are very immersive, rewarding you with unique experiences and items.”
- “The storyline isn't great and the tutorial that doesn't end is kind of stupid.”
- “Very handheld; there are quests that reward you by spawning in food.”
- “Strange story.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, including frequent glitches that can lead to lost progress if players haven't saved recently. Additionally, installation problems are reported, with the process often freezing at 100%.
- “It glitches you out a tremendous amount, and if you didn't save anything, you're cooked. There's also a lot of purple everywhere sometimes.”
- “Every time I try to install it, it just freezes at 100% and goes back to the install button.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The humor in the game is widely praised, with players finding it genuinely funny and enjoyable, contributing to an overall positive experience.
- “This game is hilarious; it keeps me laughing throughout!”
- “The humor in this game is top-notch and adds so much to the experience.”
- “I love how the game incorporates witty jokes and funny scenarios!”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's optimization has received mixed feedback, with some players noting that it requires high-performance mobile devices to run smoothly, even on low graphics settings. Additionally, issues such as a lengthy tutorial and a lackluster storyline have contributed to a less than ideal experience for certain users.