Village Feud

About

Village Feud is a single player and multiplayer strategy game. It was developed by Veelhoek Studios and was released on June 21, 2019. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

In "Village Feud," players step into the shoes of rival families in a medieval village, managing resources, making strategic decisions, and engaging in tactical battles to gain dominance. Each decision made can have far-reaching consequences, affecting the family's reputation and power within the community. The game offers a blend of city-building, resource management, and turn-based combat, providing a rich and immersive gaming experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

72%

Audience ScoreBased on 452 reviews

gameplay10 positive mentions

stability24 negative mentions

The game is fun to play with friends and offers a good time-killing experience.
It has a lot of potential and can be enjoyable despite its current bugs and lack of updates.
For its low price, it provides decent entertainment value and can be a fun casual game.

The game has been abandoned by the developers, leading to a lack of updates and content.
It is riddled with bugs and glitches, making gameplay frustrating at times.
The AI can be unbalanced, and the game lacks depth, leading to repetitive gameplay.

gameplay
40 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
60%
15%
The gameplay is described as basic and buggy, with many users noting that while the core concept is fun, the execution lacks depth and polish. Players have reported clunky mechanics, predictable AI, and various glitches that detract from the experience, making it feel more like a simple flash game than a fully developed title. Overall, it offers a brief entertainment value but requires significant improvements to sustain long-term engagement.
- “There's sooooo much to do with gameplay.”
- “A nice little game with good mechanics and is good for burning time.”
- “It's a good basic idea of gameplay that is actually fun if you like tycoon and (kind of) city-building style games.”
- “The sound effects are dumb, the gameplay is boring, and the AI is predictable.”
- “The concept is basic, and the groundwork has been laid for everything around the meta, but the actual gameplay is worse than crude.”
- “The gameplay is basically like a flash game that got fleshed out in 3D: churn out units until somebody dies.”
stability
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is plagued by numerous bugs and glitches, making it frustratingly unstable and often unplayable, especially at higher tiers. While players find the core gameplay enjoyable and humorous, the lack of updates and unresolved issues significantly detract from the overall experience. Many users express hope for future improvements, but currently, the game's stability is a major concern.
- “In its current state, it's full of bugs, glitches, and unfinished features.”
- “I bought this to play with a friend, and once you hit tier 3, it becomes unplayable due to game-breaking bugs and glitches.”
- “Most of the negative things I have to say about this game are being fixed; I personally think this game will be an 8 when they are finished with it, but as of now, it's just too buggy and too repetitive to be that high.”
graphics
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
50%
21%
Overall, the graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the style and humor, while others note that improvements are needed in animation, scenery variety, and troop design. Ratings vary, with some giving a solid 5/5, while others suggest a score of around 7, indicating potential but also room for enhancement.
- “I enjoy playing this game; the graphics and voice acting are funny, and I love the progression system.”
- “Graphics: 5/5”
- “Graphics: 7 (for what it's trying to be, the graphics are good, but could use some improvements as well as variety in scenery and troops. The animations must be fixed as well.)”
- “Graphics: 7 (for what it's trying to be, the graphics are good, but could use some improvements as well as variety in scenery and troops. The animations must be fixed as well)”
- “Graphics: ravenfield (meh)”
- “Graphics: ravenfield (meh)”
music
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
67%
25%
The game's music and audio elements are widely criticized, with many reviewers noting a complete absence of background music, which contributes to a feeling of emptiness. Additionally, the sound effects are described as either poorly executed or comically bad, further detracting from the overall experience. Overall, players are calling for significant improvements in both music and sound design.
- “Please add music.”
- “There's no music, so it feels really empty, and the sound effects are hilarious at best, really bad at worst.”
- “The game is missing a lot of things, namely proper audio (sound effects and music) and the combat is very rigid and glitched.”
- “No blood, no music, the animations are bad.”
humor
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with many players finding the graphics and voice acting amusing, despite some cringe-worthy moments. While the bugs and glitches often add to the comedic experience, they can also lead to frustration. Overall, the game is seen as a fun and funny experience, albeit with a lack of depth and polish.
- “I enjoy playing this game; the graphics and voice acting are funny, and I love the progression system.”
- “Not too deep and pretty buggy, but a fun and funny experience considering what you are paying.”
- “There's no music, so it feels really empty, and the sound effects are hilarious at best, really bad at worst.”
story
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
62%
38%
The reviews indicate that the game lacks a significant story, with multiple users noting the absence of a narrative.
- “No story.”
- “No story.”
- “No story.”
grinding
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Players report that grinding in the game is excessively time-consuming, often requiring a significant investment of effort akin to having a "second life." The ease of player deaths can lead to crippling deficits, which further hampers progress and can bring gameplay to a standstill.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “It's fairly easy to kill the other player, and the deficit that players can go into on death can be crippling, grinding the game to a halt.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game is widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, leading many users to recommend avoiding it altogether.
- “This game is a cash grab, and I strongly encourage anyone to steer clear of it.”
- “This game is a cash grab, and I strongly encourage anyone to steer clear of it.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is characterized by a slow-paced narrative that leaves players feeling uncertain about their connections and the identities of those involved in their experiences. This ambiguity can create a sense of emotional distance, making it challenging for players to fully engage with the story.