The game has potential as a decent indie title and is fun for a few rounds.
It's free to play and offers a variety of game modes, which can be enjoyable.
The concept is interesting, and some players find the gameplay to be fun despite its current issues.
The graphics are outdated, resembling early 1998 PC games, and the game is poorly optimized, often running at low FPS.
The AI is unresponsive and lacks challenge, making combat feel unbalanced and repetitive.
There are significant bugs and issues, including a lack of instructions, poor controls, and a limited number of maps and weapons.
graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
42%
25%
The graphics of the game have been widely criticized, with many reviewers comparing them to those of early 1998 PC games, citing issues like glitches and poor visual quality despite the high system requirements. While some players found the graphics acceptable and enjoyed the gameplay for a short time, the overall consensus leans towards disappointment, particularly regarding the game's visual fidelity and control responsiveness.
“It has good graphics, and the gameplay is fun for a few rounds.”
“Graphics do not have to be great to have a good game.”
“Graphics are of early 1998 PC games, not as videos, and the AI do not die when you unload 15 clips into their head.”
“I don't understand how this game can require an RTX 3060, lol, with those graphics.”
“It's a really glitchy game, with bad graphics, and the controls don't always work.”
gameplay
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
20%
20%
The gameplay is generally enjoyable with good graphics and fun mechanics, particularly in short bursts. However, it suffers from limitations such as a lack of weapon variety, issues with bot positioning, and a somewhat repetitive nature. Despite these drawbacks, players appreciate the game's early access status and overall performance, finding it entertaining and well-executed for a free title.
“I recommend this game simply for the fact that I'm not expecting a fully complete game. It's in early access, it's free, and the gameplay isn't bad (maybe repetitive). I've encountered no bugs so far, and the game runs perfectly fine for me.”
“So now the game works, it works really well. The gameplay is funny, the AI is good, and the map is well done. Great job, developers!”
“It has good graphics, and the gameplay is fun for a few rounds.”
“For the gameplay cons, there is a lack of weapons and no secondary gun. The gameplay seems to revolve around waiting for the enemy to mess up before moving forward, or you end up soloing most of the enemies. Additionally, there is no way to exit lean mode without sprinting, and the game doesn't pause when you go into the menu while in a game. Sometimes, the checkpoints place the bots in a bad position, and the bots change location if you go from point B to A and then back to B, which causes most bots to position themselves poorly.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the humor in the game to be a standout feature, particularly praising the smart and hilarious AI that enhances the gameplay experience. The "free for all" mode is highlighted as a favorite, contributing to the overall fun and engaging atmosphere of the game.
“The free-for-all mode was my favorite, and the AI is smart and hilarious to play around with.”
“Now that the game works, it runs really well with funny gameplay, good AI, and a well-designed map. Well done, developers!”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Users express a strong aversion to advertisements in the game, indicating that the presence of ads negatively impacts their experience.