- December 18, 2014
- Reliance Games
Ultimate Robot Fighting
90%Game Brain Score
graphics, gameplay
monetization, stability
90% User Score 10,000 reviews
Platforms
About
Ultimate Robot Fighting is a free-to-play card collectible game featuring 3v3 combat with powerful robots. Swipe and tap to unleash devastating moves, upgrade and level up your robots, and enjoy console-quality graphics. The game is free but some in-app purchases are available.











Audience ScoreBased on 10,000 reviews
graphics446 positive mentions
monetization51 negative mentions
- The game features great graphics and engaging gameplay, making it enjoyable for players.
- It offers a variety of robots with unique abilities, enhancing the overall experience.
- The game is addictive and can be played offline, which is a significant advantage.
- There are frequent bugs and glitches, particularly with the game's responsiveness and loading times.
- The in-game currency is hard to earn, making it difficult to purchase new robots and upgrades.
- The game often requires an internet connection for additional downloads, which can be frustrating for players.
graphics
549 mentions Positive Neutral NegativeThe graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising them as good or even excellent, particularly in comparison to older versions. However, there are also numerous comments highlighting the need for improvements, particularly regarding character detail and background quality. Overall, while the graphics are generally appreciated, there is a consensus that enhancements could elevate the visual experience further.
“The graphics are incredible...one of the best robot fighting games available.”
“Awesome graphics and gameplay.”
“I love this game and its graphics are the best in a robot fighting game.”
“The characters' graphics need to be more clear and solid looking; the characters/robots look like a rough sketch.”
“This is the worst game ever; the graphics are the poorest and it does not worth 221 MB.”
“Wow, the graphics have become worse; it was good in 2016.”