TV Trouble

About

TV Trouble is a single player arcade puzzle game. It was developed by SUPERCORE Games and was released on March 3, 2016. It received positive reviews from players.

The year is 1967 and you are a TV repair person. Get to work. Solve micro-puzzles to tune in and repair as many televisions as you can against the clock.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

86%

Audience ScoreBased on 28 reviews

humor1 positive mentions

optimization3 negative mentions

Dynamic and engaging gameplay with a variety of mini-games that keep players entertained.
Bright and colorful graphics that enhance the comedic tone of the game.
Intuitive controls that make it easy for players to jump in and enjoy short gaming sessions.

Lacks depth and long-term engagement, leading to repetitive gameplay after a short time.
Graphics and design may feel dated and simplistic, which could deter some players.
The game has a low player count and may not appeal to a wide audience despite being free.

gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
24%
38%
The gameplay is described as addictive and satisfying, centered around tuning vintage televisions to achieve a clearer picture within a time limit. While the core mechanic is engaging, some users suggest improvements in visual and audio quality to enhance the experience. The nostalgic element of featuring 50's and 60's TV commercials adds a unique charm to the gameplay.
- “Addicting and highly satisfying gameplay.”
- “The basic mechanic is addictive and it's fun tuning the sets, but the real star of the show are the actual TV commercials from the 50s and 60s that play on the TVs.”
- “TV Trouble is a free-to-play game where you play as a television mechanic. The goal is to find the correct angle of the antenna and fine-tune the television to get a clearer picture. However, you have to tune the television set within 20 seconds; otherwise, you will not gain any points and will move on to the next television set.”
- “They should improve the tuning gameplay, add some meter or frequency animation, picture quality, etc.”
- “If your game doesn't look and sound like the gameplay trailer, try a reboot.”
- “One definite plus: if you do find this game endlessly enjoyable, there probably is a real job out there for you fixing electrical equipment, 'cause the gameplay is pretty much just twiddling dials 'til the signal works and the cows come home.”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews; some users criticize them for being simplistic and resembling low-quality mobile app designs, while others appreciate the aesthetic quality, noting that it looks visually appealing and well-executed.
- “Whatever you think this game is gonna be, that's pretty much what it is... though perhaps a smidgen harder and a tad more aesthetically accomplished (it does look and sound really pretty).”
- “The graphics are really nice.”
- “The graphics aren't great; they're kind of simple, with inauthentic-looking designs and low-poly assets that might even be geared towards mobile apps rather than a PC game.”
- “Whatever you think this game is going to be, that's pretty much what it is... though perhaps a smidgen harder and a tad more aesthetically accomplished (it does look and sound awful pretty).”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The reviews suggest that while the puzzle game is unique and enjoyable, it lacks a compelling story or progression, which diminishes its overall satisfaction. Players express a desire for a more engaging narrative, whether through gradual reveals or humorous elements.
- “A unique and fun puzzle game that kind of needs a story or some sort of progression to be as satisfying as it should be.”
- “I'd really like to see this developed into something more engaging, be it a 'Papers, Please' style slow reveal, or something comical like the old John Cheever story about the radio.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
The optimization aspect of the game includes a two-minute performance test that evaluates players and assigns a letter grade based on their results.
- “The optimization mechanics are intuitive and rewarding, allowing players to fine-tune their strategies effectively.”
- “I love how the game encourages you to optimize your approach, making each decision feel impactful and strategic.”
- “As it stands, you have a two-minute test after which your performance is evaluated and you receive a letter grade.”
- “The optimization in this game feels rushed and incomplete, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences.”
- “I encountered numerous bugs and performance issues that severely impacted my enjoyment of the game.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express strong disapproval of the game's monetization model, indicating that if it involved microtransactions or pay-walls, they would avoid it altogether.
- “However, if this was a paid game or a game that included microtransactions or paywalls, I would seriously steer clear of it.”
- “The monetization strategy feels overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending extra money.”
- “It's frustrating that essential features are locked behind paywalls, which detracts from the overall experience.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is characterized as straightforward and quick, delivering laughs effectively without overcomplicating the comedic elements.
- “Simple, fast, funny.”