Tofu Survivor-Fight Now
"Tofu Survivor: Fight Now" is a cute and fun survival game where players team up with charming heroes to battle monsters. The game features exciting combat and strategic gameplay, encouraging players to work together to defeat challenging foes. With its adorable art style and thrilling action, "Tofu Survivor: Fight Now" is a must-play for fans of cooperative gaming.
Reviews
- The game features cute characters and engaging gameplay, making it enjoyable for players.
- It has a solid core gameplay loop typical of the survivor genre, with responsive controls and smooth graphics.
- The game is F2P friendly, allowing players to progress without feeling heavily pressured to spend money.
- The game is plagued by excessive ads and monetization tactics, making it feel like a pay-to-win experience.
- There are significant issues with AI-generated art and graphics, leading to inconsistencies and a lack of polish.
- Gameplay can become repetitive and lacks depth, with many players feeling that it doesn't offer enough challenge or variety.
- monetization28 mentions
- 7 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 93 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized for being overly aggressive, with numerous ads and significant paywalls that hinder gameplay. Players report that while the game is free to start, removing ads and accessing features often requires expensive monthly subscriptions or one-time payments, leading to frustration. Despite some positive remarks about the game's fun elements, the overwhelming presence of ads and high costs for ad removal detract from the overall experience.
“However, the first thing you notice after getting through the initial run is the entirety of the top of the screen bogged down with every free-to-play monetization gimmick humanly possible.”
“Paying monthly for no ads is ridiculous.”
“It's as cookie cutter as any other but with more ads and more things locked behind paywalls and adwalls.”
“This game costs nothing to start, but to get it to a point where it isn't an ad watch simulator, costs 24 dollars. Assumedly, that microtransaction doesn't include not having to deal with ads, and it's 18 dollars a month.”
“However, the first thing you see after getting through the initial run is the entirety of the top of the screen bogged down with every free-to-play monetization gimmick humanly possible.”
- gameplay17 mentions
- 41 % positive mentions
- 41 % neutral mentions
- 18 % negative mentions
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the core survivor mechanics and cute anime aesthetics, while others criticize the simplicity and outdated shooting mechanics. Although many features are unlockable through gameplay, concerns about unbalanced gameplay and poor quality of life elements persist. Overall, the gameplay is seen as enjoyable but could benefit from improvements and clearer mechanics.
“Honestly, the core survivor gameplay loop is here, and it has cutesy anime style stuff, which I'm down for.”
“Gameplay itself is simple and good 5 star worthy.”
“Very cute girl design style and fun gameplay.”
“As I thought, this is a lazy game made by lazy creators using AI... I had hoped it was only the advertisement that was like this, or at least the gameplay makes up for it.”
“Pretty 5* game except certain mechanics aren't explained and seem like it's cheating.”
“Looks entirely AI generated, and gameplay isn't as good as their other game.”
- graphics14 mentions
- 43 % positive mentions
- 36 % neutral mentions
- 21 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising the smoothness and quality of the 3D models, while others criticize inconsistencies and issues stemming from AI-generated elements. Despite some graphic problems, many players find the overall aesthetic appealing and enjoyable, particularly in comparison to other survival games. However, certain design choices have led to significant backlash from specific player demographics.
“Graphics are quick and smooth.”
“Guys, this game is totally epic love the graphics, and story line.”
“Out of all survival games, Tofu has above average in-game graphics.”
“The graphics are meh; due to it being AI-generated, there are a lot of inconsistencies with the character designs and just overall jankiness, but the 3D models are genuinely quite good.”
“There are definite graphic problems; not everything is being rendered, including attacks from heroes and enemies alike.”
“Out of all survival games, Tofu has above average in-game graphics, except the AI-generated menu, which hurts.”
- story5 mentions
- 40 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 60 % negative mentions
The story of the game is generally praised for its epic quality and engaging graphics, though some players find the gameplay mechanics, such as mission requirements and inventory management, frustrating and in need of improvement. Overall, while the narrative is well-received, the execution of certain gameplay elements detracts from the experience.
“Guys, this game is totally epic! I love the graphics and the storyline.”
“I fell asleep on the 3rd mission and still passed.”
“Ridiculous... in order to fulfill the mission, which is to upgrade, dismantle, etc., you need to click one by one.”
“Needed improvements or fixes: crafting items should go directly to inventory, add a reset timer for daily & weekly quests, dismantle quest counts bulk dismantling as 1, so if I dismantle 50 it only counts as 1, scrolling on the map would be better instead of pushing a button, chapter 3 final boss invincible glitch.”
- music5 mentions
- 40 % positive mentions
- 20 % neutral mentions
- 40 % negative mentions
The music in the game has been positively received, with players appreciating its quality and noting the inclusion of a song from the earlier title "Lobotomy Corporation" by Project Moon. Overall, the soundtrack enhances the gaming experience and is recognized for its appeal.
“Nice game, good music.”
“I noticed that one of the songs for this game is a song used in Lobotomy Corporation, a game made by Project Moon back in 2018.”
“I would hate to see such a sweet song from my favorite game not be recognized.”
- optimization2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Overall, users find the game to be well optimized and well made, indicating a positive reception regarding its performance. However, there is a suggestion that there is still potential for further development and improvement.
“I can see this game has more potential to develop; it's actually well optimized and well made, that's my own opinion.”
- character development1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 100 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Character development in the game is hindered by inconsistent and janky AI-generated graphics, although the 3D models themselves are well-crafted. This inconsistency may detract from players' overall immersion and connection with the characters.
- grinding1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be excessive, often feeling that it leans towards a pay-to-win model, which can detract from the overall enjoyment.
“Overall, it's just daily grinding and pay-to-win.”
“The grinding feels endless and tedious, making it hard to enjoy the game.”
“I find the constant need to grind for resources really frustrating.”
- stability1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Users report significant stability issues, including frequent freezes during load screens and instances where progress is not recognized after completing stages.
“The game frequently freezes between load screens, and I've beaten stage 2 twice but it freezes before I get credit for my progress.”
“I experience constant crashes that disrupt gameplay, making it nearly impossible to enjoy the game.”
“The stability issues are frustrating; the game often lags and crashes, ruining the overall experience.”