Time War

About

Time War is a single player simulation game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Let’s travel by opening the door of time! "Time War"

Genres & Tags

Simulation

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

76%

Audience ScoreBased on 342 reviews

humor3 positive mentions

monetization46 negative mentions

The game is engaging and fun, providing a good challenge that keeps players hooked.
There are no forced ads, allowing for a more enjoyable gameplay experience.
The graphics are cute and the gameplay is simple yet entertaining.

The game has a frustrating difficulty curve, making progression feel nearly impossible without watching numerous ads or spending money.
Many features are buggy, leading to unplayable situations and a lack of rewards for watching ads.
The gameplay becomes repetitive quickly, with a heavy reliance on ads for progression.

monetization
49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
2%
4%
94%
The monetization strategy of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing frustration over the reliance on ads for progression and rewards. While some appreciate the absence of forced ads, others criticize the excessive number of ads needed to advance, labeling it as a "pay-to-win" model that detracts from the overall enjoyment. Additionally, issues with ad rewards not functioning properly and high costs for ad-skipping options have further contributed to negative sentiments regarding the game's monetization approach.
- “With decent monetization, I would continue with the game.”
- “Avoid this game; there is one almost identical called 'We Are Warriors' that is much better. This game traps you from the first level, forcing you to watch ads constantly to try to progress. I must have watched over 200 ads in 2 days just trying to get past the first level. Do not waste your time or money; it's a trap.”
- “When you're forced to watch ads for your daily missions, I immediately consider the game to be bad. It is frustrating and bothersome to be forced to do something like that to get the few gems you will get 'freely' (it shouldn't be possible legally to call it free if you have to watch ads).”
- “My big complaint is the obscene monetization. $1 per ad skip is ridiculous, and you have to watch huge numbers of ads to progress.”
grinding
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The reviews indicate that the game features significant grinding elements, often requiring players to watch ads or spend real money to progress. Many users find the gameplay repetitive and tedious, with a slow start that becomes increasingly grindy as they advance, leading to a general sense of boredom with the genre.
- “Really wanted to like this one but it quickly turned into a very boring grinding game that requires lots of ad watching or real money to progress.”
- “The start is very grindy and by universe 10 I was clearing levels after 4-5 attempts each.”
- “Pretty basic grinding and time-consuming game; I got bored with this genre.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics of the game are described as cute and fitting, with a simple style that some players appreciate. However, there are criticisms regarding glitches and a lack of smoothness, as well as concerns about the artwork being too childish and reminiscent of previous titles. Overall, the graphics evoke mixed feelings among users.
- “Other than that, the graphics and gameplay are cute.”
- “Graphics are fitting.”
- “The graphics are simple, which I like, but I think that they could be a little more smooth.”
- “Trash, if you like grueling over simple upgrades and very childish artwork, this is the game for you.”
- “It's literally identical to games I've owned previously with a slightly different graphics style.”
- “The graphics are glitchy.”
story
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
20%
60%
The story aspect of the game is perceived as somewhat engaging, with missions described as substantial; however, frustrations arise from mandatory ad viewing for daily missions and bugs affecting mission resets, leading to a diminished overall experience. Players express a desire for a more refreshing narrative and gameplay structure.
- “Make a new story game like this.”
- “When you're forced to watch ads for your daily missions, I immediately consider the game to be bad... it is frustrating and bothersome to be forced to do something like that to get the few gems you will get 'freely' (it shouldn't be possible legally to call it free if you have to watch ads).”
- “Weekly mission bugged and not resetting.”
- “It's okay, but the game's daily missions won't renew, so there's no point in keeping playing.”
gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The gameplay is generally considered cute and features fun mechanics, but it suffers from repetitiveness and a slow progression pace. Additionally, users noted that the user interface could be improved to enhance the overall experience.
- “The mechanics are fun in concept.”
- “The graphics and gameplay are cute.”
- “Gameplay repeats itself after a while, and you see the same characters again.”
- “Gameplay is slow; progression feels sluggish, and the UI could use some work.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is criticized for its significant stability issues, with users reporting numerous bugs that hinder gameplay. Many feel that progress is heavily reliant on expensive microtransactions, further detracting from the overall experience.
- “Not a bad game, but the other features are very buggy.”
- “Extremely buggy; if you want to make any progress at all, you'll have to cave to their ridiculously priced microtransactions.”
- “Cheap, buggy game.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players find the game to be exceptionally funny, highlighting its strong comedic elements.
- “The game is absolutely hilarious!”
- “I couldn't stop laughing at the witty dialogue and funny scenarios.”
- “The humor is spot on, making every moment enjoyable.”