Taxi Simulator

About

Taxi Simulator is a single player casual simulation game. It was developed by Whoisthis and was released on March 31, 2022. It received negative reviews from players.

AboutMaybe we've all wondered what taxi drivers go through, what difficulties they face, maybe we have dreamed of being a taxi driver. We designed this game to understand and explain what it is like to look at life through the eyes of a taxi driver. You can grapple with all sorts of ordeals on a deserted mountain road and make your bread with your sweat, or you can manage a taxi station in the cit…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

31%

Audience ScoreBased on 13 reviews

gameplay3 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

Taxi Simulator offers a unique blend of management and driving simulation, allowing players to experience the complexities of running a taxi business.
The game includes useful elements such as functional rear view mirrors and a system that penalizes players for traffic violations, adding depth to the driving experience.
Players can engage in various activities, including upgrading vehicles and managing finances, which can appeal to simulation enthusiasts.

The game has been criticized for its lack of meaningful updates and support from the developers since its Early Access launch, leading to a stagnant experience.
Many players have reported significant bugs and issues, contributing to an overall perception of the game as unfinished or abandoned.
The game's graphics and overall polish are considered underwhelming, with some reviews labeling it as an asset flip and questioning the ethical practices of the developer.

graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
33%
50%
The graphics prioritize clarity and utility over high-end visuals, resulting in a design that is immersive yet may feel outdated compared to more polished simulation titles. While the art style and environment contribute positively to the experience, the overall graphical fidelity lacks the polish expected by players accustomed to more ambitious games, making it a challenging recommendation.
- “This contrast in visual quality may impact how deeply players feel drawn into the game world, especially for those used to more graphically ambitious simulations.”
- “The design focuses on clarity and utility over high-end graphics, which can be seen as both a strength and a limitation.”
- “While the art style and environment design manage to provide a decent level of immersion, the graphics may feel somewhat underwhelming or outdated compared to other simulation titles that offer more polished visuals.”
- “However, the game’s present shortcomings in polish, graphical fidelity, and ongoing developer support make it a challenging recommendation at this time.”
gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
Taxi Simulator features a diverse range of activities that promote strategic planning and immediate challenges in navigating city streets. Players find a good balance between the game's price and its offerings, though the overall quality aligns with smartphone gameplay standards.
- “In terms of gameplay, Taxi Simulator offers a variety of activities that players can engage in.”
- “Ideally, this multifaceted gameplay loop would encourage players to strategize and plan carefully while experiencing the more immediate challenge of navigating the city streets.”
- “The price compared to what you get in the game does strike a good balance, but keep in mind a smartphone gameplay quality.”
- “The price compared to what you get in the game does strike a good balance, but keep in mind the smartphone gameplay quality.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization aspect has been criticized for being exploitative, with accusations of plagiarism due to the lack of credit given to original artists and developers, leading to perceptions of the game as a cash grab.
- “The developers didn't credit any of the artists and real game developers who created the assets, which feels like plagiarism and a cash grab.”
- “The monetization strategy is overly aggressive, making it difficult to enjoy the game without spending money.”
- “It feels like the game is designed to push players towards microtransactions rather than providing a fair experience.”