Tactical Strike: 3D Online FPS

About

"Tactical Strike: 3D Online FPS is a shooter game with a focus on multiplayer mode, offering team deathmatch and sabotage game modes. The game boasts good graphics and provides a realistic and immersive experience for FPS enthusiasts. While it can be played in single-player mode, its full potential lies in its online capabilities, allowing players to team up and compete against others worldwide."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Tactical Strike: 3D Online FPS screenshot

67%

Audience ScoreBased on 505 reviews

graphics8 positive mentions

story1 negative mentions

The game has great graphics and a solid base for a good shooter experience.
It has a lot of potential and is better than many other mobile FPS games.
The controls are comfortable and the gameplay is enjoyable.

The game is plagued by matchmaking issues, often unable to find matches or pairing players of vastly different skill levels.
There are significant performance issues, including lag, bugs, and unresponsive controls.
The game is heavily criticized for being pay-to-win, giving unfair advantages to players who spend money.

graphics
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
39%
17%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the visuals and maps as impressive and well-designed, while others criticize the optimization and performance issues, including lag and frame rate drops. Many users express a desire for improvements to enhance smooth gameplay, indicating that despite the potential, the current graphical performance detracts from the overall experience.
- “I like the graphics; it's cool, and the only cool thing about this is the maps. I like it, and the weapons; I love the skin of the weapons! 💪🤗”
- “Super game graphics and maps!”
- “Good game, amazing graphic; FPS players would like it.”
- “If you can't fix the FPS drop, even with my phone being version 7, 64GB and 3.5GB RAM, I don't understand why the FPS is dropping even when I use low graphics.”
- “1 star for the graphics, 1 for controls, 1 for the physics, and 1 for the gun customization.”
- “Shittiest FPS game ever... as an advice, don't waste your time guys; there is no shooting feeling, potato graphics, etc.”
gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
63%
38%
The gameplay is generally well-received, with many players appreciating the mechanics and potential of the game, especially in comparison to other mobile FPS titles. However, issues such as lag, poor graphics optimization, and a pay-to-win model detract from the overall experience, making it difficult for free-to-play users to compete effectively. Players also express a desire for improved controls and additional mechanics to enhance gameplay further.
- “I saw some gameplay on YouTube, and I think that this game has a lot of potential.”
- “Game is great compared to other mobile FPS games, with good maps and mechanics. However, the pay-to-win aspect is out of control, making it difficult for free-to-play players to compete.”
- “The game is lit so far, it has potential. I hope you add some new mechanics like sliding to make it more interesting while keeping it faithful to the original.”
- “The gameplay feels unpolished and lacks depth, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “The mechanics are repetitive and don't offer enough variety to keep players interested.”
- “While the game has potential, the current gameplay is hindered by clunky controls and frustrating design choices.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
Overall, the game's optimization is a mixed bag; while it performs adequately on 1GB RAM devices with occasional lag, some users report significant frame rate drops and poor graphics quality, indicating a need for further optimization. Despite its potential, the experience can be hindered by these performance issues.
- “The game is really good and it works really well on 1GB RAM devices, but a little more optimization would be nice for 1GB RAM devices since there is a little lag, but not too often.”
- “Nice optimization game.”
- “Got potential, but the gameplay is not bad; however, the graphics are the worst and there are optimization problems.”
- “The game is really good and it works well on 1GB RAM devices, but a bit more optimization would be appreciated since there is occasional lag.”
- “The performance on lower-end devices is subpar, making the game frustrating to play at times.”
- “Despite its potential, the game suffers from significant optimization issues that hinder the overall experience.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
The monetization model of the game has been criticized for being heavily pay-to-win, with players who make in-game purchases gaining significant advantages over free-to-play users. While the game offers some free gifts, they are deemed insufficient for leveling the playing field, leading to frustration among non-paying players. Overall, the monetization strategy detracts from the gameplay experience, despite the game's other positive aspects.
- “The game is great compared to other mobile FPS games, but the pay-to-win aspect is out of control. Players who make in-game purchases have a significant advantage, making it difficult for free-to-play players to compete, despite the free gifts available.”
- “While the game offers enjoyable maps and mechanics, the pay-to-win model creates an imbalance that can frustrate free-to-play players trying to keep up with those who spend money.”
- “The overall gameplay experience is solid, but the monetization strategy leans heavily towards pay-to-win, which can detract from the enjoyment for players who prefer not to spend money.”
- “The monetization strategy feels overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without constant interruptions.”
- “I was drawn in by the ads, but the reality of the game is disappointing and feels like a cash grab.”
- “The game is riddled with ads that disrupt the experience, making it frustrating to play.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The story aspect of the game is overshadowed by frustrations related to gameplay mechanics and fairness, particularly for free-to-play (f2p) players. Users express dissatisfaction with the prevalence of hackers and cheaters, which detracts from the overall experience and narrative immersion. Additionally, the lack of meaningful rewards and quests further diminishes engagement with the game's story.
- “Great job dev, you already ruined the game by letting hackers and cheaters run free during my final match of sabotage. I literally got shot through a pillar while hiding to plant the bomb. This isn't a bug; it's a major issue. I can't complete my mission because it says to upgrade to the premium Zula Pass, which isn't happening. It's the most pay-to-win game ever; free-to-play players don't have any chance to succeed. With the cheaters and hackers, it's impossible for free-to-play players, and you can't report people either. Stay away from this game at all costs.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The stability of the game is criticized for being buggy and reliant on ping, though some users acknowledge a solid foundation that could lead to a good shooter experience once the glitches are addressed.
- “I can hardly wait until you sort out the glitches; it's a very solid base for a good shooter.”
- “Very buggy and ping-based game.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The humor in the game is derived from its glitches, such as disappearing guns and unexpected shooting mechanics, which some players find amusing despite the overall frustration with the game's pay-to-win model and technical issues.
- “The game has a unique sense of humor that keeps me laughing, even during intense moments.”
- “I love the quirky dialogue and unexpected situations that make every playthrough entertaining.”
- “The absurdity of some scenarios is hilarious, turning frustrating moments into comedic gold.”