Survivor in the Forest 2

About

Survivor in the Forest 2 is a 3D puzzle adventure game with clicker elements. Meet the continuation of the first part of the adventure game. You returned home, but something strange happened. The street was too quiet and deserted, find out what happened and how to fix it. Explore the surrounding area, collect valuable resources, hunt animals, fight zombies and most importantly, do everything to su…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

90%

Audience ScoreBased on 10 reviews

graphics4 positive mentions

monetization2 negative mentions

The game features nice graphics and implementation.
It has engaging 3D puzzle elements mixed with clicker gameplay.
The game can be played on low-end PCs, making it accessible to a wider audience.

The game is an asset flip with low-quality, mismatched assets and lacks originality.
There is evidence of review manipulation, with fake positive reviews misleading potential buyers.
The game does not meet basic standards for modern PC games, lacking essential features like resolution options.

graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
80%
60%
The graphics of the game are generally praised for their beauty and implementation, with many users highlighting the exciting levels and pleasant aesthetics. However, there are complaints about the lack of resolution options and graphics customization, which limits the overall experience. Despite these drawbacks, the game is noted for its appealing visuals, even on low-end PCs.
- “A lot of exciting levels, beautiful graphics, and pleasant music.”
- “Very nice graphics and implementation, but very simple quests.”
- “A groovy game with cool graphics that requires only a deep low-end PC to meet the system specs.”
- “There's no option to change the resolution and no useful graphics tweaks.”
- “The graphics look outdated and lack detail, making the game feel less immersive.”
- “Character models are poorly designed and animations are stiff, which detracts from the overall experience.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized for being exploitative, with accusations of plagiarism and cash grabs through the use of uncredited assets. Additionally, there are concerns about the authenticity of user reviews, suggesting a coordinated effort to promote these low-quality products.
- “The developers didn't credit any of the artists and real game developers who created the assets, which feels like plagiarism and a cash grab.”
- “The reviews are all written in either Russian or broken English, appearing almost simultaneously shortly after the game launched on Steam. They all have a direct purchase of the game and are consistently used to write fake reviews for asset flips and other cash grabs.”
gameplay
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The gameplay is described as unique and engaging, offering a fresh experience that stands out from other games.
- “Interesting gameplay; I've never seen anything like it before.”
- “The mechanics are intuitive and engaging, making every session enjoyable.”
- “The variety of challenges keeps the gameplay fresh and exciting.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The music in the game is praised for being pleasant and enhancing the overall experience, complementing the exciting levels and beautiful graphics.
- “The game features a lot of exciting levels, beautiful graphics, and pleasant music.”
- “The soundtrack perfectly complements the gameplay, enhancing the overall experience.”
- “Each level has its own unique music that keeps the gameplay fresh and engaging.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story is present and acknowledged by users, though specific details or depth are not elaborated upon in the reviews.