Survivalcraft

About

Survivalcraft is a single player management game. It received positive reviews from players.

"Survivalcraft is a simulation game that offers an exciting adventure in an infinite, realistic world filled with various animals. While it boasts spectacular game mechanics and amazing visuals, some players may find it very grinding and buggy. The game encourages players to explore and survive, making the most of their environment and resources."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

87%

Audience ScoreBased on 9,986 reviews

graphics85 positive mentions

stability96 negative mentions

graphics
145 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
59%
34%
7%
The graphics of the game receive a mixed but generally positive reception, with many users praising their realism and detail compared to Minecraft. While some players note inconsistencies and areas for improvement, the overall consensus highlights the game's superior visual quality and immersive environments, making it visually appealing and engaging. However, a few reviews mention issues with performance and graphical glitches that detract from the experience.
- “Beautiful graphics.”
- “The graphics are amazing, the sound is perfection.”
- “The graphics and the scenery is phenomenal.”
- “It does not match the art style at all.”
- “I think you should work on that, as well as the mediocre graphics; every animal looks realistic in a way, but then the cows and bulls have these weird eyes, the design is inconsistent.”
- “This game has gotten crappy with graphics and performance; worst $5 ever. The main problem is the platform... I could maybe see this taking off as a PC game but horrible on phone.”
stability
100 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
3%
1%
96%
The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with many reporting frequent glitches, freezes, and crashes across various devices. While some players experience minimal issues, the majority indicate that the game often becomes unplayable due to these technical problems, particularly after recent updates. Overall, the game is enjoyable but requires urgent fixes to improve its stability and performance.
- “I love the control system for this game; it works fine and I suffer no glitches on my tablet.”
- “It also runs great.”
- “This game has no glitches; it is also really addicting and it is just like Minecraft, just no multiplayer but it costs $3 less.”
- “Too many glitches and bugs.”
- “My only problem is a major one, no matter how much I reduce the frame rate, the rendering speed, or anything like that, it still glitches about every 10 seconds.”
- “It freezes every single time I try to play, within 2 minutes of playing.”
story
38 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
74%
8%
The game's story aspect is generally viewed as lacking depth, with many players expressing a desire for a more developed narrative and additional quests. While some appreciate the imaginative potential and backstory, they feel that the absence of a structured storyline and multiplayer options detracts from the overall experience. Players frequently compare it unfavorably to other games like Block Story and Minecraft, calling for updates that would enhance storytelling elements and gameplay dynamics.
- “This game is well written and in-depth with an interesting storyline.”
- “It was fun and I liked how there were stories you can follow.”
- “Great back story, controls, and environment.”
- “No online play, mode or storyline.”
- “The game doesn't have a story mode, it doesn't have multiplayer, and transportation is a no-go.”
- “But you could add an option for a storyline and add tameable dogs and cats and a breeding line.”
gameplay
36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
53%
39%
8%
The gameplay is praised for its smooth mechanics, detailed survival elements, and impressive graphics, often being compared favorably to Minecraft, particularly its Pocket Edition. While many players appreciate the depth and variety of activities available, some express frustration with certain mechanics, such as horse riding and crafting issues, and suggest improvements like multiplayer support and enhanced fishing options. Overall, the game offers a rich experience with a lot of potential for further development.
- “Good touch controls, smooth gameplay, no bugs, and a ton of stuff to do, craft and explore - excellent!”
- “The gameplay and survival mechanics are so detailed and realistic, it is almost unbelievable.”
- “Great game you should definitely download if you enjoy Minecraft, it gives you a lot of creative freedom and is always updating to improve the gameplay, also it has a forum where you can discuss and recommend changes with other players and the creators, the gameplay is amazing in itself.”
- “Half of the game mechanics don't make sense, like when you ride a horse and then you run past a tree, you die randomly, losing all of your stuff and starting at the beginning.”
- “When I was crafting on a saved level, gameplay crashed and gets stuck on the generating terrain portion at the start of the game.”
- “It freezes every time after about 5 minutes of gameplay!”
grinding
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be overly tedious and frustrating, particularly due to the challenging farming mechanics and scarcity of resources. Many express a desire for more engaging features, such as improved farming systems, additional animals, and easier combat, to enhance the overall experience. While some appreciate the potential for future updates, the current state of grinding is seen as a significant barrier to enjoyment.
- “I can't recommend this game to anyone these days though, it is tediously too hard so much so I have chosen not to buy the second one.”
- “The survival elements are more pronounced here, as food is more scarce and farming is more difficult.”
- “Oh yeah and please make it so it takes less wheat to make bread, wheat farming is complicated as is.”
monetization
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
9%
58%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with some users perceiving it as a cash grab due to the presence of ads, while others appreciate the absence of ads in certain versions, enhancing their experience. Many players prefer a one-time purchase model over in-app purchases, believing it leads to a more enjoyable and uninterrupted gameplay experience. Overall, the sentiment leans towards favoring ad-free options and a straightforward pricing structure.
- “This game is awesome, but my number one reason for liking it is because it has no ads.”
- “It is better with no ads in games.”
- “I see it as a cash grab.”
- “I just bought it to see if it was the same as I remembered, but it still had ads!”
- “It is better if a game costs money because then there will be no further in-app purchases which rip you off.”
music
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
50%
30%
Players express a desire for enhanced music features in the game, including background music to alleviate feelings of loneliness and music players for creating personalized experiences, such as dance rooms. While some appreciate the game's content, they feel that the addition of music could significantly improve the overall experience. Overall, the consensus is that incorporating more musical elements would enrich gameplay and engagement.
- “It's a fun game for when you're bored and you can also download other people's games that they have created, like cities, castles, and music!”
- “Also, can you put in music players because I am making a dance room.”
- “It would be much better if you guys added music.”
- “#2 background music, so it won't make players feel so alone and depressed.”
- “And some in-game music so the game won't get boring quickly.”
optimization
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
30%
30%
Overall, the game's optimization is praised for its performance on PC, running smoothly even at high render distances, but it struggles significantly on lower-end mobile devices, particularly the Samsung Galaxy S5, where users report frequent crashes and lag. While it performs well on newer models like the S4 and S6, the experience on older or less powerful phones is disappointing, leading to frustration among players.
- “In terms of performance, it runs very well.”
- “I even overmaxed the render distance to 512 blocks vs the in-game 256 limit to test, and it runs surprisingly well (15-25 fps in 1440p at that distance is a testament to just how well optimized the engine is), though I usually go with 256 for better fps.”
- “This game has been optimized for even the lowest-end devices and runs like melted butter on PC.”
- “It will crash on the simplest task even with the performance options set for slower devices (Galaxy S5 is not slow). Please fix this and I will rate this app what it deserves.”
- “This game has gotten crappy with graphics and performance. Worst $5 ever. The main problem is the platform... I could maybe see this taking off as a PC game but horrible on phone.”
- “Every two steps it stuttered and lagged badly. So bad I can't even play anymore. I adjusted all the performance settings to low and the problem persisted.”
humor
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is highlighted by its amusing sound effects and the unexpected antics of animals, which often lead to comical situations, such as predators attacking through closed doors. Players find the blend of challenging gameplay and humorous elements, like glitches and quirky interactions, to be a significant source of enjoyment. Overall, the game successfully combines creativity with humor, making it a fun experience.
- “Survival mode is remarkably challenging and creative mode is hilarious infinite fun.”
- “It's hilarious too, especially the sound effects when you are getting beat up by an animal.”
- “It's not an easy game because you could get attacked at any moment, but it's so funny to me.”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere of the game is highly praised for its realistic and immersive qualities, creating a sense of tension as players must remain vigilant against natural threats. Reviewers highlight the superior graphics and overall ambiance, distinguishing it from similar titles like Minecraft.
- “This has what Minecraft doesn't: a nice, realistic atmosphere where you must watch your back against natural enemies.”
- “This game has the best graphics, best atmosphere, and best developer.”
- “I love the atmosphere.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users suggest that the replayability of the game is lacking compared to alternatives like Minecraft, which is considered more engaging and enjoyable for survival gameplay.
- “If you want a survival game, buy Minecraft; it's way better and way more replayable.”
- “The game lacks the depth needed for meaningful replayability.”
character development
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Users express a desire for greater freedom and variety in character development, suggesting the inclusion of more animals, customizable features, and diverse gameplay elements. They seek enhancements such as different hairstyles, character designs, and the ability to tame and interact with a wider range of creatures, indicating a need for deeper personalization and engagement in the game's character system.
- “Would like the same freedom with character development.”