Survival Island: EVO 2 Game Cover

Survival Island: EVO - How Long Can You Stand out in the Wild?

Reviews

70%
Audience ScoreBased on 10,000 reviews
graphics467 positive mentions
monetization572 negative mentions
  • graphics713 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews from users, with many praising the visuals as "good" or "great," particularly for a mobile game, while others criticize them as "poor" or "not as advertised." Some players appreciate the art style and detail, noting that it enhances the gameplay experience, while others express disappointment over graphical glitches and inconsistencies. Overall, while the graphics are often highlighted positively, there is a clear demand for improvements and fixes to enhance the overall visual quality.

    • “Graphics are crisp and bright.”
    • “The graphics are awesome and the controls are ok.”
    • “This game is amazing, very easy to control & very nice graphics.”
    • “The graphics are so low quality and the frame rate is horrible and even the way it's made sucks.”
    • “The graphics are poor and the controls are near impossible to work with.”
    • “Terrible graphics; Minecraft looks better than this.”
  • monetization581 mentions

    The monetization strategy of the game has drawn significant criticism from users, with many expressing frustration over the overwhelming number of ads that interrupt gameplay. Players report being bombarded with ads before even starting the game, as well as during gameplay, leading to a perception that the game prioritizes advertising revenue over user experience. While some users acknowledge the option to watch ads for in-game resources, the sheer volume and frequency of ads have made the game largely unplayable for many, prompting calls for a paid ad-free version.

    • “I made in-game purchases with real money.”
    • “No ads at all unless you choose.”
    • “Immediate delivery of in-app purchases.”
    • “This game is horrible; it always freezes and has too many ads.”
    • “Way too many ads completely unplayable.”
    • “This is not a game, it's an ads machine.”
  • gameplay127 mentions

    The gameplay of the game is generally well-received, with many users finding it entertaining and addictive, though some express concerns about slow controls and excessive hunger/thirst mechanics. While the graphics are often praised, issues such as frequent ads, bugs, and a lack of depth in gameplay mechanics detract from the overall experience for some players. Overall, the game shows potential but requires improvements in controls, resource management, and the reduction of interruptions to enhance player enjoyment.

    • “Great game with a lot of possibilities, great mechanics, just wish you could jump to traverse the area easier. Other than that, great game that is fun to play.”
    • “Very nice and addictive gameplay. Keep up the good work, and I can't wait for the multiplayer update to play with my friends!”
    • “Graphics and gameplay are excellent; the general feel of the game is superb for a mobile app, and the first few hours are a lot of fun with a great feeling of accomplishment.”
    • “Gameplay is not working.”
    • “Terrible gameplay, help with tasks during the game.”
    • “The gameplay is subpar.”
  • story116 mentions

    The game's story is generally viewed as interesting and original, but many players feel it lacks depth and progression, with little to no missions or objectives to engage with. While some appreciate the initial storyline, they express frustration over its limited development throughout gameplay, leading to a repetitive experience. Overall, players are calling for more quests, character development, and a richer narrative to enhance their gaming experience.

    • “The story line is incredible and these are exactly the kind of games I'm looking for!”
    • “I love this game very good graphics and controls. I can imagine that I am also a survivor and surviving, and I also like the story of the game.”
    • “Great graphics + great gameplay + great adventure + great story = great game.”
    • “No missions or objectives.”
    • “Game is good..... but there is no meaning of playing.... no mission... no story...”
    • “The story part has no relevance to the game too, it just tried to capture you by saying 'there's more to this game than just survival, folks!' when literally it's just another bad survival game with freakishly hard difficulty trying to make you throw some money to play their game.”
  • stability91 mentions

    The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with frequent reports of freezing, glitches, and crashes that often require restarts, leading to lost progress. Many players express frustration over the game's performance, particularly after updates, and highlight issues with connectivity and gameplay interruptions. Overall, the game is seen as having great potential, but it is currently hindered by its numerous technical problems.

    • “Very disappointed in the game because they tagged it offline, but mid-game it freezes and then you have to go online to continue.”
    • “The game freezes with a white screen after the Unity engine logo is shown.”
    • “This game is horrible; it always freezes and has too many ads.”
  • grinding17 mentions

    Players express frustration with the excessive grinding required to build bases and gather resources, often feeling that the effort does not yield sufficient rewards. While some enjoy the challenge and find the game addictive, many suggest that incorporating features like farming and animal domestication could enhance the experience and reduce the tedium associated with grinding. Overall, the desire for more engaging gameplay elements is a common theme among reviews.

    • “Just seeing the complaints about the amount of grinding it takes to build even a simple base... that's the whole base of the game; without a base, what's the point?”
    • “This game is far too much grinding for far too little reward.”
    • “The controls suck, it's difficult to do anything, you can't walk and look around, sometimes it lags with the buttons, you move forward as you collect things, I don't think there is a farming system (which would be a great improvement); it's fun all in all, but the controls are unnecessarily difficult to deal with, and it is difficult to get materials for anything.”
  • humor14 mentions

    The humor in the game is widely appreciated, with many users finding it genuinely funny and entertaining, especially during gameplay moments like fighting or dying. However, some players also express frustration with technical issues, which detracts from their overall enjoyment. Despite these concerns, the game's comedic elements seem to resonate well with a majority of players.

    • “Cool app, funny and a struggle, but still super cool.”
    • “It's funny.”
    • “So funny, nothing like Far Cry 3.”
  • optimization6 mentions

    Overall, user feedback on optimization is mixed; while some players report good performance on specific devices like the Samsung S7, others experience issues with high system requirements and subpar performance on similarly spec'd phones. There are calls for improvements, particularly regarding the gathering performance of bone tools and better overall optimization for a wider range of devices.

    • “Performance is good (Samsung S7).”
    • “My phone is pretty decently spec, but for some reason it required high-end specs to run smoothly.”
    • “Bone tools should have better gathering performance.”
    • “I don't know if it supports my device, or maybe they didn't update the game to be more optimized for other phones.”
    • “And optimized alright.”
  • music4 mentions

    Reviews indicate that while the game's music is generally appreciated, there are calls for improvements in sound effects and the addition of new background music. Players express a desire for a more engaging auditory experience to enhance gameplay. Overall, the music contributes positively to the game's atmosphere, but there is room for enhancement.

    • “Great art and music plus it gives me a sense that I don't have to be controlled.”
    • “I love to play this game but with better and smoother gameplay and also the ability to aim... and also music.”
    • “The only thing that needs improvement is the sound effects for this game, and it also needs some new background music.”
    • “I love to play this game, but it could really benefit from better and smoother gameplay, as well as improved music.”
  • replayability1 mentions

    Users highlight that the game boasts a high replay value, indicating that players find it engaging enough to return to multiple times.

    • “It already has a high replay value.”
    • “The game offers multiple endings and choices that make each playthrough feel unique.”
    • “With various character builds and strategies, I find myself coming back for more.”
  • emotional1 mentions

    Users express frustration with the emotional impact of intrusive ads, noting that they disrupt gameplay and lead to a negative experience. This constant interruption detracts from the overall enjoyment and immersion in the game.

Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Survival Island: EVO 2

Play time

5hMedian play time
4hAverage play time
2-6hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 2 analyzed playthroughs

Similar Games