Skip to main content

Space Clash: Galaxy Attack

Space Clash: Galaxy Attack Game Cover
76%Game Brain Score
graphics, gameplay
monetization, story
76% User Score Based on 830 reviews

Platforms

TabletAndroidPhoneMobile Platform
Buy NowGet on Play Store
Space Clash: Galaxy Attack Game Cover

About

Space Clash: Galaxy Attack is a single player casual shooter game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

The fate of the galaxy relies upon your fingertips.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Space Clash: Galaxy Attack screenshot
Space Clash: Galaxy Attack screenshot
Space Clash: Galaxy Attack screenshot
Space Clash: Galaxy Attack screenshot
Space Clash: Galaxy Attack screenshot
Space Clash: Galaxy Attack screenshot
Space Clash: Galaxy Attack screenshot
Space Clash: Galaxy Attack screenshot
Space Clash: Galaxy Attack screenshot
Space Clash: Galaxy Attack screenshot
Space Clash: Galaxy Attack screenshot
Skip User Reviews

76%
Audience ScoreBased on 830 reviews
graphics17 positive mentions
monetization38 negative mentions
  • The game features enjoyable graphics and smooth gameplay, making it a fun shooter experience.
  • Players appreciate the strategic elements involved in planning weapon and equipment loadouts for challenging stages.
  • The game is entertaining and can be addictive, providing a nostalgic feel reminiscent of classic arcade shooters.
  • Many players feel that the game is a direct copy of the original Win Wing, lacking new content or improvements, making it feel redundant.
  • The monetization model is heavily criticized, with numerous reviews highlighting the pay-to-win mechanics and frustrating grind for upgrades.
  • There are persistent issues with ads interrupting gameplay and technical glitches that hinder the overall experience.
  • monetization
    41 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has drawn significant criticism, with players reporting an overwhelming presence of ads that disrupt gameplay and hinder progress. Many users describe the game as a "cash grab," highlighting issues such as broken ad rewards, intrusive advertisements, and a lack of meaningful free content. While some players appreciate the option to progress without spending money, the overall sentiment leans towards frustration with the excessive and poorly implemented ad system.

    • “No ads unless you want them.”
    • “Fun game though the monetization is greedy.”
    • “Super fun, but in retrospect, such a cash grab.”
    • “This entire game is a pure cash grab, money-hungry, disgusting excess of devs... I won't spend a single penny on anything they release again.”
    • “Come on with the ads, ads, and more ads... disappointing.”
  • graphics
    28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players appreciating the cartoony style and vibrant visuals, describing them as "great" and "excellent." However, some users criticize the graphics for being misleading compared to promotional images, and a few mention issues like lag and lack of innovation from previous versions. Overall, while the graphics are generally well-received, opinions vary based on personal preferences and expectations.

    • “Its got great great graphics, fun options, and cute characters.”
    • “I'm old-school in nature, so this is right up my alley plus the graphics are straight fire.”
    • “This game is of excellent graphics, absolutely brilliant with the actual gameplay and I'm extremely happy with this game so go on people give it a go you will not be disappointed.”
    • “Fake game name, fake title, fake pictures and fake graphics compared to the content.”
    • “Same graphics as the original, same mechanics as the original, same everything as the original with zero innovation or improvements as these people claim in their responses to these reviews.”
    • “The crappiest experience I ever had with the game; the graphics did nothing to come anywhere near what they advertised it to be.”
  • gameplay
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is described as both addictive and challenging, maintaining the same mechanics and graphics as the original, but with little innovation or improvement. Some users feel that the game has become more stingy with rewards, while others appreciate the familiar yet engaging experience. Overall, opinions are mixed regarding the execution and evolution of gameplay elements.

    • “Superb art and gameplay.”
    • “Like the gameplay and challenging levels.”
    • “Addictive gameplay.”
    • “Same graphics as the original, same mechanics as the original, same everything as the original with zero innovation or improvements as these people claim in their responses to these reviews.”
    • “The only difference between Winwing 1 and 2 is that they tweaked the same stages, enemies, and gameplay rewards to be extra stingy.”
    • “The gameplay is nothing like it's advertised.”
  • story
    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect of the game has received significant criticism for its lack of originality, with many users expressing disappointment that it mirrors the first installment too closely. Reviewers noted that missions, aircraft, and weapons are identical, leading to a repetitive experience devoid of meaningful narrative progression or innovation. Overall, players were hoping for new content and a more engaging storyline, but felt let down by the game's stagnation.

    • “Good graphics and awesome story line!”
    • “Grind without any sense of merit, no story.”
    • “Same missions, same ships, same home screen, same music, same abilities.”
    • “Same ships, same missions, same everything.”
  • grinding
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews indicate that the game suffers from excessive grinding, similar to its predecessor, with players noting the high cost of in-game purchases as a significant drawback. While some users find the early game manageable, the later stages become overwhelmingly grindy, prompting frustration. Overall, the balance between gameplay and monetization appears to be a major concern.

    • “Not non-stop ads, not too grindy so far.”
    • “A copy-paste of the original, as grindy as its predecessor and flawed with the same super expensive in-game purchases.”
    • “Spoiled by being unbelievably grindy later on.”
    • “Or you can pay 12-23€ (!) as I said, unbelievably grindy.”
  • music
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is generally well-received, described as "cool," but it suffers from a lack of variety, as players note that it remains unchanged across missions and settings. Overall, while the music complements the graphics, its repetitiveness may detract from the overall experience.

    • “The graphics are good, and the music is cool too.”
    • “The music is repetitive and lacks variety, making it feel stale after a short time.”
    • “I found the soundtrack to be uninspired and forgettable, which detracts from the overall experience.”
    • “The same music plays on loop, and it becomes annoying rather than enhancing the gameplay.”
  • replayability
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users highlight that the game boasts a high replay value, making it enjoyable to revisit multiple times.

    • “The replay value is incredibly high, making each playthrough feel fresh and exciting.”
    • “There are so many different choices and paths to explore, which adds to the game's replayability.”
    • “I find myself coming back to this game time and time again because of its endless replay potential.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Space Clash: Galaxy Attack

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Space Clash: Galaxy Attack is a casual shooter game.

Space Clash: Galaxy Attack is available on Phone, Tablet, Android and Mobile Platform.

Space Clash: Galaxy Attack was developed by IVYGAMES.

Space Clash: Galaxy Attack has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

Space Clash: Galaxy Attack is a single player game.