Site Takeover

About

Site Takeover is a single player casual strategy game. It received neutral reviews from players.

Crash the enemy and conquer the site!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

50%

Audience ScoreBased on 196 reviews

monetization57 negative mentions

The game has a fun and addictive premise, making it enjoyable to play.
Players appreciate the ability to upgrade troops, which adds a sense of progression.
The game can be a good way to kill time and offers a decent challenge from the AI.

There are overwhelming amounts of ads, often forcing players to watch them to progress.
Many players experience glitches and crashes, leading to lost progress and frustration.
The game is criticized for being unbalanced, with opponents having unfair advantages that make it difficult to win without watching ads.

monetization
60 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
95%
The monetization strategy of the game has been heavily criticized for its overwhelming number of ads, with many players reporting that they spend more time watching advertisements than actually playing. Users express frustration over the forced nature of these ads, which often feel necessary to progress or succeed in the game, leading to a perception of the game as an "ad simulator." While some players appreciate the option to purchase an ad-free experience, the frequent glitches and issues with restoring purchases further detract from the overall enjoyment.
- “Fun game, I purchased the no ads for a few dollars.”
- “Purchased the $4.99 no ads and 2.25k daily from the shop and have been playing for a while with over 50 hours in the game.”
- “More ads than game!”
- “Unplayable after the first 30ish levels without watching ads.”
- “Overwhelming amount of ads make it unplayable, don't bother unless you are looking for an ad simulator.”
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
150%
The gameplay is generally enjoyable and presents a reasonable challenge from the AI; however, players express frustration with the power-up system, particularly the lack of control over which power-ups are received. Suggestions include implementing a coin system to allow players to choose specific power-ups, as the current mechanics can lead to repetitive and unhelpful rewards.
- “That's a fun game with a decent challenge from the AI. I would suggest implementing a coin system that allows players to use power-ups at their discretion or to select a specific power-up.”
- “The gameplay is engaging and offers a good level of challenge, making it enjoyable for players who appreciate strategic elements.”
- “I love the variety of gameplay mechanics, which keeps each match fresh and exciting. The balance between challenge and fun is well executed.”
- “The gameplay is frustrating due to the random power-up system. I often end up with multiple 10x coins in a single match, which don't stack, and it feels like a waste of time. I would suggest implementing a coin system that allows players to choose their power-ups instead.”
- “The AI presents a decent challenge, but the gameplay mechanics are broken. I find myself watching ads for advantages, only to be disappointed by the power-ups I receive. If the current system is too complex, perhaps simplifying the AI would help.”
- “While the game is fun, the gameplay suffers from poor power-up distribution. I frequently get power-ups that don't enhance my experience, and it detracts from the overall enjoyment. A more strategic approach to power-ups would greatly improve the gameplay.”