Shoot on Sight

About

Shoot on Sight is a single player and multiplayer action game. It was developed by Aroko Game Studio and was released on October 15, 2024. It received neutral reviews from players.

Decades of rule by the rich have left the world on the brink of collapse. With oppression and corruption running rampant, the people have finally had enough. The Stagers lead the revolution to bring The System down and will stop at nothing to bring justice to this world, facing the most elite agents mustered by the wealthy to defend their ill-gotten gains. Who will you fight for? Shoot on Sight…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

58%

Audience ScoreBased on 33 reviews

graphics4 positive mentions

story1 negative mentions

The game features decent graphics and dynamic level design, providing a satisfying experience for players.
Gameplay is engaging with a variety of weapons and equipment, allowing players to choose their preferred strategy.
The game is fun to play with friends and offers a nostalgic feel reminiscent of classic shooters.

There is no meaningful single-player content, and the online community is virtually nonexistent, leading to a lack of players.
The matchmaking system is poorly designed, causing frustration and long wait times for players.
The game suffers from awkward controls and mechanics, making it difficult to enjoy the gameplay experience.

graphics
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
57%
14%
29%
The graphics in the game receive mixed reviews, with some players finding them passable or abysmal, while others praise the stunning visuals and artistic landscapes that enhance the overall experience. While decent graphics and dynamic level design are highlighted positively, there is a consensus that impressive visuals alone are not enough to compensate for poor gameplay mechanics.
- “Shoot on Sight is an exciting and engaging game that impresses with its decent graphics and dynamic level design, providing a satisfying experience for players.”
- “In terms of graphics, the colors work perfectly and the environment design is great.”
- “The graphics are stunning and the landscapes are beautifully artistic, which really enhances the overall experience.”
- “The graphics in this game are passable, but could be better.”
- “The gameplay is atrocious, the graphics are abysmal, and the mechanics feel like they were slapped together by someone who’s never played a shooter before.”
gameplay
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
71%
15%
14%
The gameplay of *shoot on sight* receives mixed reviews; while some players appreciate the variety of weapons and the engaging, competitive nature that offers hours of entertainment, others criticize the mechanics as poorly executed and the overall experience as lacking polish. Despite the challenges posed by the bots, which some find frustrating, others view them as a means to improve skills. Overall, the game presents a blend of enjoyable and flawed elements in its gameplay.
- “I love the style of the game; the mechanics work flawlessly. Also, people say the bots are broken, but I say it's challenging, which I’m sure was the purpose of the game mode to train and get better.”
- “Another positive aspect of *shoot on sight* is the variety of weapons and equipment available, allowing players to choose their preferred strategy and gameplay style as they complete missions.”
- “Overall, *shoot on sight* is a fun and thrilling game with dynamic gameplay and diverse challenges that can entertain you for hours, providing a valuable experience for fans of action games.”
- “The gameplay is atrocious, the graphics are abysmal, and the mechanics feel like they were slapped together by someone who’s never played a shooter before.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game's story is perceived as lacking depth, with developers relying on player interactions to compensate for storytelling and level design. However, the variety of weapons and equipment enhances gameplay, allowing players to adopt different strategies while completing missions.
- “The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design, etc. to the game.”