Screamer 2
- September 15, 2017
- Graffiti
The follow-up to Screamer is an arcade-style racing game. Unlike its predecessor, it offers a more rally-oriented gameplay. The twelve selectable high-performance road cars of the previous game have been replaced with four rally cars. The game features an improved graphics engine (SVGA) and various tracks including England, Switzerland, Egypt, Colombia, and others. These tracks may be slippery or …
Reviews
- Screamer 2 is a nostalgic trip for fans of 90s racing games, offering improved graphics and gameplay compared to its predecessor.
- The game features a variety of tracks and customizable cars, providing a unique challenge and engaging driving experience.
- Despite its age, the game runs smoothly on modern systems and retains a fun, arcade-like feel that many players still enjoy.
- The game suffers from dated graphics and sound design, with loud engine noises and limited audio options that detract from the experience.
- Collision physics and AI behavior can be frustrating, leading to unpredictable outcomes during races and a lack of refined handling.
- As a port of an old DOS game, it lacks significant updates or improvements, making it feel like a lazy re-release rather than a modern adaptation.
- music7 mentions
- 43 % positive mentions
- 14 % neutral mentions
- 43 % negative mentions
The music in the game has received largely negative feedback, with players criticizing the overwhelming engine noise that drowns out the soundtrack and the lack of volume control options. The soundtrack itself is described as generic 90s electronic music, leading many to prefer turning it off entirely. Overall, the audio experience is marred by poor sound management and unappealing music choices.
“Suddenly, the soundtrack of the game came into my head.”
“Oh, and don't even get me started about the soundtrack!”
“You can turn the music off, and you'll probably want to, as there's only so much generic 90s electronic music one sane mind can take.”
“This engine noise is throughout the whole game and drowns out the music.”
“The engine sound is very loud and there's no volume control for either sound effects or music.”
“You can turn the music off, and you'll probably want to, as there's only so much generic 90s electronic music one sane mind can take, but the sound effects are non-negotiable.”
- graphics3 mentions
- 67 % positive mentions
- -67 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game are noted for their faithful adherence to the original design, but they are widely considered dated, even by 90s arcade standards. While some appreciate the graphic design, many reviewers feel that it is the only redeeming quality of the game, which has not aged well overall.
“The graphics are spot on with the original release.”
“Having said that, I wouldn't recommend this game to anyone at this time (26 years after its launch): the only good thing about it to me is the graphic design; everything else aged like milk.”
“The graphics look dated even by 90's arcade standards.”
“The character models are poorly designed and lack detail.”
“The environments feel bland and uninspired, making the game visually unappealing.”
- gameplay3 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- -100 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The gameplay is characterized by a nostalgic 90's arcade racing experience that is both fun and unrealistic, featuring diverse tracks with unique themes and mechanics. While the AI and controls can be inconsistent and collision physics may frustrate players, the core driving experience remains enjoyable and satisfying.
“Classic 90's arcade racer with super fun and completely unrealistic gameplay.”
“Each track is different from the others, both in theme and in gameplay.”
“The AI and controls might be a little rough at times, and the collision physics can be a bit unpredictable, if not aggravating, but the core gameplay - the actual driving - just feels good.”
“The gameplay feels repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to stay engaged.”
“The controls are unresponsive, which makes the gameplay frustrating and unenjoyable.”
“There are too many bugs that disrupt the gameplay experience, leading to frequent crashes.”
- replayability1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -500 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Reviews indicate a mixed perception of replayability, with some players appreciating the game's depth and variety that encourage multiple playthroughs, while others feel it leans more towards repetitive gameplay rather than offering substantial new experiences.
“The game offers incredible replay value, with multiple endings and choices that make each playthrough feel unique.”
“Every time I play, I discover new strategies and secrets, keeping the experience fresh and exciting.”
“The variety of character builds and play styles encourages me to dive back in and try something completely different.”
“The game feels more like a chore than an enjoyable experience on replay; there's little incentive to go through it again.”
“Once you've completed the game, there's not much left to draw you back in; it lacks meaningful choices that would encourage multiple playthroughs.”
“Replay value is almost non-existent; the game offers the same experience each time without any significant changes or surprises.”
- optimization1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Overall, the game's optimization is solid, with users reporting smooth performance and no crashes encountered during gameplay.
“Performance is fine, and I haven't experienced a single crash.”
“The game runs smoothly even on lower-end hardware, which is impressive.”
“I appreciate the frequent updates that improve performance and optimize gameplay.”