Skip to main content
SciFi Survivor Game Cover

About

SciFi Survivor is a single player casual role playing game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

SciFi Survivor is a single-player role-playing game where you survive the apocalypse by crushing all monsters. It features awesome gameplay and perfect visuals but involves very grinding progression. However, the experience is often interrupted by too much advertisement.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

79%
Audience ScoreBased on 813 reviews
graphics14 positive mentions
monetization43 negative mentions

  • The game features smooth animations, fun gameplay, and a variety of weapon combinations, making it enjoyable to play.
  • It has a unique take on the survivor genre with engaging mechanics and potential for growth, keeping players interested.
  • The graphics and sound effects are well-designed, contributing to an immersive gaming experience.
  • The game is heavily pay-to-win, making it difficult to progress without spending money, especially after early levels.
  • There are frequent ads and pop-ups that disrupt gameplay, leading to frustration among players.
  • Many players report bugs and issues with game stability, including crashes and lost progress after purchases.
  • monetization
    49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing frustration over the prevalence of ads and the high costs associated with in-game purchases. While some users find the option to remove ads for a fee reasonable, others feel that the game leans heavily towards a pay-to-win model, making progression slow without spending money. Overall, the balance of ads and monetization strategies appears to detract from the gameplay experience for a significant number of players.

    • “Worth it to buy no ads.”
    • “I would've bought the no ads and gave you 5 stars.”
    • “And only $9.49 for no ads?”
    • “You can also remove ads for $10, which is a bit much, and can also spend $4 to max each skill and pay for gear...seems like a heavy-duty pay-to-win game.”
    • “Game is fun for 3, maybe 4 levels, then unless you watch a ton of ads and unlock stuff by paying for it, just forget it.”
    • “Fun game, but needy developers feel it necessary to spam ads on literally everything, seriously slow progression unless you pay.”
  • graphics
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the graphics of the game receive mixed to positive feedback from users. While some describe them as decent or okay, others praise the visuals as fabulous and great, particularly appreciating the sci-fi aesthetic and smooth controls. However, there are also calls for improved rendering optimization and enhancements in future updates.

    • “Great game, great graphics and easy to earn crystals when grinding!”
    • “Fabulous graphics and upgrades for the tank, awesome sound effects.”
    • “Visuals are great.”
    • “The game visuals and mechanics seem to be okay, but someone has to look at the rendering optimization.”
    • “Graphics quality needs to be improved.”
    • “Have yet to play the game, I was stopped while trying to get anything done and asked to give my opinion; well, the game sucks, it has no gameplay whatsoever, and it has very boring graphics.”
  • gameplay
    17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is generally praised for its smooth animations, fun mechanics, and potential for growth, with customization options and a unique trailer mechanic adding to the experience. However, some users find it repetitive and boring, citing issues with ad interruptions and difficulty spikes, which detract from the overall enjoyment. While the game shows promise, it also faces criticism for rendering optimization and stability issues.

    • “It is fun, it is kept simple to handle, the game has a lot of room for growth, and the basic gameplay has a lot of potential for more battlefront adventure.”
    • “Great mechanics and a wonderful challenge.”
    • “Completely boring and not worth the time; the gameplay is bland and repetitive. There's nothing different or unique; it's the same as all the rest of its genre.”
    • “It crashes a lot, and when you reconnect, it doesn't ask to rejoin the gameplay.”
    • “The pace of actual gameplay is a bit more methodical rather than the twitchy runners, and the upgrade tracks feel more reasonable.”
  • grinding
    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The reviews highlight a mixed perception of grinding in the game, with some players finding it excessively grindy and time-consuming, particularly for earning upgrades and unlocking content without spending money. Others appreciate the balance of grinding, noting that while it can be intensive, it also offers reasonable rewards and is not overly burdensome. Overall, the consensus suggests that while grinding exists, its impact varies significantly depending on whether players choose to invest financially.

    • “This has a chance to become a really amazing game; it's not grindy, earnings and prices are really reasonable.”
    • “It's simple but fun; it also is not grindy at all.”
    • “It's a pay to win; yeah, you can earn the gems to unlock new heroes to play, but it would take countless hours of grinding to get the gems needed, and all the required gems are insanely high cost-wise.”
    • “It's a good game, but a lot of grinding if you're not willing to pay for upgrades.”
    • “Very, very grindy, not in a good way.”
  • story
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect of the game is criticized for being overshadowed by frustrating daily quests that are deemed nearly impossible to complete, particularly for free-to-play players. Users express a desire for more engaging missions and optional story content, while also highlighting issues with the game's pay-to-win design and lack of offline rewards. Overall, the narrative experience is seen as lacking depth and accessibility.

    • “More missions, more optional story, less cost for your in-game store.”
    • “Thanks for fixing the error in level 22 mission ”
    • “The game runs smoothly, but it has a few issues: 1.) the design is very pay-to-win, 2.) there's no offline rewards, so you need to farm on stages, which is hard if you're a free-to-play player, 3.) the items are ineffective in terms of effects, 4.) the daily quest becomes impossible as you progress.”
    • “Daily quest is just impossible to complete on a daily basis.”
    • “Daily quest is unreasonable: one of the daily requirements is to collect 9 stars per day.”
  • stability
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game suffers from significant stability issues, with frequent freezes during battles and bugs that prevent enemies from being properly defeated, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences. Users have reported that these technical problems detract from the overall enjoyment of the game.

    • “The game freezes very often while in battle, and I'm not certain about the reason - too many XP drops, sound effects, or enemies on screen for calculations.”
    • “Nice game, but unfortunately, frequent freezes!”
    • “Very buggy. The worst bug is when you kill an enemy, but it doesn't die, and your gun is fixed on it, so you just get swarmed because you can't shoot anything else.”
  • optimization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's visuals and mechanics are generally satisfactory, but there are concerns regarding the need for improved rendering optimization.

    • “The game visuals and mechanics are impressive, but there is a need for improvement in rendering optimization.”
    • “The optimization of the game significantly enhances the overall experience, making it smoother and more enjoyable.”
    • “I appreciate the attention to detail in optimization, which allows for seamless gameplay even on lower-end systems.”
    • “The game visuals and mechanics seem to be okay, but someone needs to address the rendering optimization.”
    • “The performance issues are frustrating; the game often lags and stutters, indicating poor optimization.”
    • “Despite the interesting gameplay, the frequent frame drops and long loading times suggest that optimization was not a priority.”
  • humor
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is generally perceived as lacking, with many users finding it not funny.

Skip Game Offers

Buy SciFi Survivor

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like SciFi Survivor

Games Like SciFi Survivor

Rogue Land ImageRogue Land ImageRogue Land Image
Space Quest: Alien Invasion ImageSpace Quest: Alien Invasion ImageSpace Quest: Alien Invasion Image
Heroes vs Hordes: Survivor RPG ImageHeroes vs Hordes: Survivor RPG ImageHeroes vs Hordes: Survivor RPG Image
Arcade Hunter: Sword, Gun, and ImageArcade Hunter: Sword, Gun, and ImageArcade Hunter: Sword, Gun, and Image
Wild Castle TD: Grow Empire Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

SciFi Survivor is a casual role playing game.

SciFi Survivor is available on Phone and Tablet.

SciFi Survivor was developed by JoyUp.

SciFi Survivor has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

SciFi Survivor is a single player game.

Similar games include Rogue Land, Space Quest: Alien Invasion, Heroes vs Hordes: Survivor RPG, Arcade Hunter: Sword, Gun, and, Wild Castle TD: Grow Empire and others.