S.T.R.E.T.C.H.

About

S.T.R.E.T.C.H. is a single player action game. It was developed by ARGames and was released on May 18, 2018. It received negative reviews from players.

S.T.R.E.T.C.H. - addictive top down flight shooter. Hardcore and simplicity of this game drags into it.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

15%

Audience ScoreBased on 13 reviews

music3 negative mentions

Easy 100% achievements can be completed in a very short time.
The game is inexpensive, making it accessible for those looking for a quick experience.
With a few tweaks, it could be a harmless, inexpensive game.

The game features no sound or music, leading to a dull experience.
Gameplay is overly simplistic with only one power-up and minimal enemy variety.
The game is poorly designed, with issues like unclear hitboxes and a cluttered screen, making it frustrating to play.

music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
20%
60%
The game features no music or sound effects, resulting in a completely silent experience, which has disappointed players who were expecting a soundtrack. Despite attempts to troubleshoot, users report that the absence of audio persists, detracting from the overall gameplay experience.
- “When your soundtrack is on sale too, I expect it to work.”
- “No music, or any sound effects at all, just dead silence as you play.”
- “The game itself runs windowed on Unity, and it features no sound, soundtrack, music, or effects at all.”
- “I was quite interested in the soundtrack; however, there was no sound in the game even though I restarted it 5 times.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The graphics of the game are criticized for their simplistic 2D animated art assets, which do not improve significantly even when resolution settings are adjusted. Players find the visuals lackluster and feel there are no substantial options available to enhance the overall graphic quality.
- “While there are options to change the resolution for the game, all this does is scale up the simplistic 3D-looking 2D animated art assets used to make the game, which makes little or no difference to the graphics quality.”
- “Without any other substantial graphics tweaks, it's not possible for gamers to improve the lackluster 2D visuals.”
gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The gameplay is characterized as slow-paced, with players noting a learning curve that may require multiple attempts to fully grasp. Despite these challenges, some users report being able to complete the game in a very short time, indicating a potentially brief overall experience.
- “The gameplay is also slow-paced.”
- “Even though I restarted the game twice to fix the sound and died 2 or 3 times before I got used to the gameplay, I finished it in 3 minutes.”
- “I actually had to reinstall it to be able to post a review - I needed two more minutes of gameplay.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The monetization strategy has been criticized for being exploitative, with accusations of plagiarism due to the lack of credit given to original artists and developers, leading to perceptions of the game as a cash grab.
- “The monetization strategy feels exploitative, prioritizing profit over player experience.”
- “It's frustrating to see so many features locked behind paywalls, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending extra money.”
- “The constant push for in-game purchases detracts from the overall enjoyment and immersion of the game.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The story of "Hecatoncheir Story" is noted to be simplistic, primarily serving as a framework for gameplay rather than a deeply engaging narrative. It is built using Unity's 3D Game Kit, which may limit its storytelling depth and complexity.
- “The story feels like a disjointed collection of clichés, lacking any real depth or originality.”
- “Character development is almost non-existent, making it hard to care about their journeys.”
- “The plot twists are predictable and fail to engage the player, leaving the narrative feeling flat.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game has been criticized for its lack of replayability, with users stating that it offers little incentive to play again after the initial experience.
- “The replay value is non-existent.”
- “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to play it again.”
- “The lack of varied outcomes makes replaying feel pointless.”