Skip to main content
S&T: Medieval Wars Game Cover

About

S&T: Medieval Wars is a single player and multiplayer casual strategy game. It was developed by HC GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION LIMITED and was released on December 10, 2013. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Medieval Wars: Strategy & Tactics: It’s time to march off!

Skip User Reviews

64%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,042 reviews
gameplay7 positive mentions
monetization8 negative mentions

  • Gameplay is engaging and fun, offering a solid strategic challenge.
  • The game features historical settings and a risk-like charm appealing to strategy enthusiasts.
  • Developers provide good customer support and regularly update to fix issues and improve playability.
  • Excessive paywalls severely limit free content, requiring purchases for most campaigns, maps, and features.
  • Many players experience bugs, crashes, and resolution compatibility issues on various devices.
  • Lack of clear tutorials and unit strength explanations makes the game hard to understand and overly difficult without spending money.
  • story
    34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story mode is criticized for having limited free content, with most missions locked behind paywalls, and an overall lack of new missions and factions. Many players find certain missions overly difficult or frustrating due to limited turns and seemingly unbeatable battles. Despite these issues, some enjoy the challenge and hope for more varied and accessible content in future updates.

    • “You really need to use your brain playing this because some missions have limited turns only.”
    • “It's impossible? But it's really fun :3 I enjoy playing (losing) it :d Can you tell me what I should do in the 2nd mission (the one to conquer Acre & Jerusalem)?”
    • “The English mission is practically unbeatable; you'll outnumber them three to one and still lose the battle.”
    • “Everything is locked behind a pay wall, barely anything is free and you can't unlock more missions and campaigns when they update the game—the new stuff is DLC.”
    • “Number of turns is always limited; only 1% of missions and scenarios are available.”
  • gameplay
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is generally smooth and accurate with a skilled AI, but many users find it overly simplistic and lacking depth, leading to repetitive "fight-only" mechanics. Additionally, frequent crashes, insufficient tutorial explanations, and the necessity to pay for essential content like maps and difficulty settings detract from the overall experience. While some appreciate the fluid interface and battle mechanics, the high cost of additional content and limited variety disappoint many players.

    • “The battle descriptions are accurate and gameplay is smooth... good job.”
    • “Good interface, fluid gameplay.”
    • “The mechanic is more simple, although the AI is very skilled; if you know how the game works, you'll be fine.”
    • “Too simple to play, just fight fight fight with unrealistic gameplay, no fun at all.”
    • “Slow, unresponsive boring gameplay.”
    • “Combat mechanics are poorly explained and a lot is completely missing from the tutorial and info tab.”
  • monetization
    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's monetization is heavily criticized for excessive and intrusive ads, high-priced in-app purchases, and limiting free content, making it feel like a cash grab. Players express frustration over the necessity to pay to fully enjoy the game and the inadequate rewards for watching ads. Overall, the aggressive monetization significantly detracts from the gameplay experience.

    • “The developers worked hard to make this game, and while there are only a few free levels, the overall experience justifies the price. Hopefully, the developers will consider better pricing or discounts in the future.”
    • “The game does rely on in-game purchases, but the quality of the content makes it worth considering.”
    • “While there are many in-app purchases, the game itself is good and offers a solid experience.”
    • “Has potential but lots of ads and almost the rest of the game requires payment.”
    • “Nothing but a cash grab, so save yourself the time.”
    • “Only a few free levels are free. The developers worked hard to make the game, but making it so expensive isn’t right. You should make the full version better than parts, or even make it totally free. Many bad ratings come from the payment model.”
  • graphics
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews on the game's graphics are mixed, with some praising the visuals as great or reminiscent of classic titles, while others criticize the graphics as poor, hard to discern, or in need of an overhaul with more animations and improved UI. Several users suggest enhancements like larger fonts, clearer unit details, and better map design to improve the overall visual experience.

    • “Great looking graphics... a nicer looking map would be a plus as would a sandbox mode.”
    • “This looks like Civilization IV which is cool. I know this is gonna be like it. 5 stars for cool graphics!”
    • “Nice game and graphics are awesome.”
    • “Terrible UI, bad graphics, and I don't think the units have any stats or descriptions.”
    • “Also need to be able to see name of units when buying; graphics on phone is hard to discern.”
    • “The graphics could use an overhaul, maybe some animation for the battles and more sound bytes to accompany them.”
  • music
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users appreciate the game's superb instrumental music but request detailed information like the names of the songs to enhance their enjoyment. Additionally, some mention issues with the music following a recent patch.

    • “The songs are also superb, but if you can give more details about the song, we can enjoy the song more, such as the name of the song.”
    • “I'd like to know the names of the instrumental songs used in the game.”
    • “Music is bugged with new patch.”
  • stability
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game has some bugs affecting stability, but overall it remains playable and enjoyable.

  • grinding
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Grinding is considered necessary due to the enemies being somewhat overpowered, requiring players to repeatedly grind and restart missions to progress.

  • replayability
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Replayability is limited by the need to purchase additional content, as unlocking all 2-player hotseat, scenario, and campaign missions requires extra purchases, which detracts from the overall enjoyment and playability.

  • optimization
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users suggest that the game could benefit from a version optimized specifically for phones to improve performance and usability on mobile devices.

Skip Game Offers

Buy S&T: Medieval Wars

1h Median play time
1h Average play time
1-1h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Games Like S&T: Medieval Wars
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

S&T: Medieval Wars is a casual strategy game.

S&T: Medieval Wars is available on Phone, iPad, iPhone, Tablet and others.

On average players spend around 1 hours playing S&T: Medieval Wars.

S&T: Medieval Wars was released on December 10, 2013.

S&T: Medieval Wars was developed by HC GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION LIMITED.

S&T: Medieval Wars has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked S&T: Medieval Wars for its gameplay but disliked it for its story.

S&T: Medieval Wars is a single player game with multiplayer support.

Similar games include Strategy & Tactics: WW2, Grand War: War Strategy Games, Great Conqueror: Rome War Game, European War 4: Napoleon, European War 7: Medieval and others.