Rules Of Survival

About

Rules Of Survival is a multiplayer role playing shooter game with a warfare theme. It was developed by Netease Games and was released on May 30, 2018. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Welcome to the brand new RULES OF SURVIVAL arena, where the deathmatch has now been raised to a thrilling epic scale! This is a Battle Royale game now played by over 100 million people worldwide. May we present you with a fully upgraded new 8x8 km map that allows 300 players to battle on a wide variety of terrains. Only one will survive! Beware, your safe zone is shrinking! So collect scattered …

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

61%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,591 reviews

gameplay22 positive mentions

stability33 negative mentions

The game is fun and enjoyable, especially when played with friends.
It runs well on low-end PCs, making it accessible to a wider audience.
The graphics and gameplay have improved compared to the free version, with less frequent encounters with cheaters.

The game is plagued by cheaters and hackers, which significantly detracts from the experience.
There are numerous bugs and performance issues, including high ping and crashes.
The monetization strategy focuses heavily on cosmetic items rather than improving gameplay or addressing cheating.

gameplay
74 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
55%
15%
The gameplay of "Rules of Survival" is characterized by a mix of basic battle royale mechanics, but it suffers from significant technical issues such as bugs, glitches, and frame rate drops that hinder the overall experience. Players report unbalanced gameplay due to overpowered weapons and a controversial microtransaction system that creates a "pay-to-win" environment. While some find the gameplay enjoyable and accessible, many express frustration over its lack of polish, originality, and persistent cheating problems.
- “Gameplay is fun and low specs, the cash system is complex as hell though.”
- “Fast paced gameplay.”
- “It's gameplay is a mix between PUBG and Fortnite, but low spec enough that my laptop can run it.”
- “Players frequently encounter bugs, glitches, and frame rate drops that significantly detract from the gameplay experience.”
- “The game includes microtransactions that can significantly impact gameplay, leading to a 'pay-to-win' scenario where players who spend money have a distinct advantage over those who do not.”
- “The controls feel clunky and unpolished, the shooting mechanics are sluggish, and the overall movement of the characters lacks any fluidity.”
graphics
70 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
37%
46%
17%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players noting poor performance, inconsistent quality, and a lack of customization options. While some appreciate the cartoonish style and find it suitable for lower-end systems, others criticize the graphics as subpar, especially when compared to competitors like PUBG. Overall, the game seems to cater to players with less powerful hardware, but many feel that significant improvements are needed to enhance the visual experience.
- “Such a great game, full of cool skins and the graphics are really good.”
- “Runs at a great frame rate with great graphics for lower spec systems.”
- “Good quality on graphics and anti-cheaters.”
- “The game's performance is notably poor on various platforms, with long loading times and inconsistent graphics further detracting from the immersion.”
- “The graphics are terrible, sound design is also terrible.”
- “Graphics are sometimes buggy, the terrain does not render.”
stability
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with players reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and frame rate drops that severely impact gameplay. Many users express frustration over persistent issues, including cheating and server lag, while some acknowledge that despite these problems, the game can still be enjoyable, especially with friends. Overall, the consensus is that significant improvements are needed to address the ongoing stability issues.
- “Players frequently encounter bugs, glitches, and frame rate drops that significantly detract from the gameplay experience.”
- “Gameplay is buggy, laggy, and full of glitches.”
- “I'm a gamer since Counter-Strike 1.6, Red Alert, Warcraft, etc., and this game is the worst I've seen in terms of cheating and glitches!”
optimization
29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
38%
38%
The optimization of "Rules of Survival" is widely criticized, with players reporting significant performance issues such as long loading times, lag, and unresponsive controls across various platforms. Many users express frustration over the lack of developer attention to these problems, which detracts from the overall gaming experience, despite some noting that the game can run on lower-spec PCs. Overall, the game's optimization is deemed poor, leading to a frustrating experience for players.
- “The optimization is pretty good; autoloot is also very nice.”
- “Nvidia surround enabled/optimized, easy 60 fps at 5760x1080.”
- “+ very well optimized”
- “The game's performance is notably poor on various platforms, with long loading times and inconsistent graphics further detracting from the immersion.”
- “The developers (Netease) have refused to fix many issues in the game, such as performance, lag, and address the heavy problem of cheaters/hackers in the game, for years.”
- “Game is completely unoptimized and pretty much trash; just don't waste your money on it.”
monetization
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
53%
41%
The monetization strategy of "Rules of Survival" has drawn significant criticism for its aggressive use of microtransactions, which create a "pay-to-win" environment that favors players willing to spend money. Many users report an overwhelming presence of ads and a focus on cosmetic purchases, detracting from the overall gameplay experience and leading to frustration among players, particularly regarding the lack of balance and performance issues. Overall, the game's monetization practices are seen as exploitative, prioritizing profit over player satisfaction.
- “There are also microtransactions in the game, but they are mostly cosmetic or loot crates.”
- “The game includes microtransactions that can significantly impact gameplay, leading to a 'pay-to-win' scenario where players who spend money have a distinct advantage over those who do not.”
- “In conclusion, while 'Rules of Survival' attempts to offer an exciting battle royale experience, it is plagued by performance issues, a lack of originality, unbalanced gameplay, and controversial monetization practices.”
- “Rules of Survival heavily leans into in-app purchases, offering players the chance to buy skins, crates, and battle passes to enhance their experience.”
humor
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
91%
27%
The humor in the game is largely derived from its cartoonish style and the amusing glitches that players encounter, especially when playing with friends. Many users find the experience hilarious, particularly when witnessing unexpected events like bans or the absurdity of game mechanics. Overall, the game's comedic elements contribute to a fun and entertaining atmosphere, despite some frustrations with its technical issues.
- “If you play this game ironically with friends, it's really funny and fun.”
- “This game is hella fun when you are with friends, especially laughing at the terrible glitches.”
- “I was laughing so hard when I claimed my season rewards and found out that the cheaters I reported have been permanently banned. Imagine cheating for countless hours to reach grandmaster, only to find out the next day that they have been banned! Best feeling ever!”
- “I don't care about the money, but seriously, this is so poor it's not funny. Such a waste of half an hour on this game.”
- “The jokes fell flat and the humor felt forced; it was more cringeworthy than entertaining.”
- “I expected some laughs, but the humor was stale and uninspired, making the experience dull.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
Players have expressed frustration over the lack of music in the game, noting that it has not been updated for several months and still features a Christmas song. Additionally, some users are experiencing issues with the game's audio, leading to a silent gameplay experience, although they appreciate the victory song when it does play.
- “Plus the victory song rules.”
- “The game still has its Christmas song, so it hasn't been updated in 5 months (currently May 2021) and there are lots of hackers.”
- “Why is there no music when I play ROS?”
- “My ROS doesn't have music in-game.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Players note that grinding in the game involves completing daily quests and farming coins for loot boxes, with some finding the process time-consuming and requiring significant dedication. The active community provides support for newcomers, but many feel that extensive grinding is necessary to progress effectively.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The communities centered on the game are active and are helping out those just starting out, and I've been grinding after getting tips on how multiplayer gameplay should go.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game lacks a coherent story, with players noting that the primary focus is on gameplay mechanics rather than narrative development. The only notable element mentioned is the ability to perform high jumps, which does not contribute to a traditional storytelling experience.
- “No story at all.”
- “The game lacks any meaningful narrative.”
- “There is no coherent plot to engage with.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express a desire for greater customization options, such as mixing and matching hair and facial features, to foster a deeper emotional connection with their characters. This suggests that personalization enhances the player's investment in the game.
- “I'd like to at least be able to mix and match the hair and faces to create something that I like, which would give me a more emotional connection with my creation.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game offers somewhat limited replayability, suggesting that while there may be some incentive to play again, it may not be compelling enough to draw players back frequently.
- “Somewhat replayable.”