Resurrector
- November 25, 2019
- GSGame
n ancient evil awoke after a thousand years of sleep. You are this evil.
Reviews
- The game is very inexpensive, making it accessible for those looking for a low-cost option.
- It offers a simple gameplay experience that may appeal to players looking for a casual, mindless game.
- The game can be played quickly, making it suitable for short gaming sessions.
- The game is an asset flip with minimal effort put into development, lacking originality and depth.
- There are significant technical issues, including poor graphics, no resolution options, and a lack of instructions.
- Player engagement is extremely low, with very few players reaching even the first level before uninstalling.
- graphics12 mentions
- 8 % positive mentions
- 67 % neutral mentions
- 25 % negative mentions
The game's graphics are criticized for their low quality, featuring simplistic, cartoony 2D visuals reminiscent of low-effort mobile apps, with no options for resolution or customization. Reviewers express disappointment that the graphics do not meet the expectations of PC gamers, highlighting a lack of skill and budget in the development process. Overall, the graphics are seen as a significant drawback, failing to deliver a visually impressive experience.
“3D graphics programming does require a degree of skill and competence, and unfortunately not all developers have the budget or talent to deliver this, despite 3D graphics cards hitting the mainstream in the 1990s.”
“There's no option to change the resolution for the game or customize the graphics settings.”
“The game features simple, cartoony 2D graphics, of the type you normally expect to see in low-effort mobile apps.”
“Considering this is being evaluated as a PC game, having the graphics phoned in like this isn't going to result in a high quality, visually impressive game that PC gamers are used to seeing.”
- monetization6 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The monetization practices of the developers have been criticized for being unethical, as they allegedly engage in plagiarism by using uncredited assets from other creators, resulting in what reviewers describe as cheap cash grabs and shovelware. This pattern of behavior raises concerns about the integrity of the games being released on platforms like Steam.
“Bitlock studio/cblck/gsgame have shown a repeat pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab, through this account or through closely linked/alt accounts.”
“It's important to also note the 'developers' here didn't credit any of the artists and real, actual game developers who created the assets here, so this is plagiarism, as well as cash grab shovelware.”
“Gamemaker Studio is most commonly used to make retro pixel shovelware and cash grabs.”
- gameplay2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The gameplay is criticized for being shallow and lacking depth, with only eight levels that suggest a reliance on a basic template rather than original design. Overall, it is viewed as having little value as a serious game.
“There's no value or merit as a serious game; this is just a shallow asset flip with very limited gameplay, and there are only 8 levels. Probably that's all the template they used had.”
- story2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The story aspect of the game has been met with disappointment, as many gamers found it unengaging and lacking appeal. Overall, it fails to capture the interest of its audience.
“Hardly a success story; gamers just weren't all that interested in the game.”