Rento Fortune Monolit

About

Rento Fortune Monolit is a digital board game similar to Monopoly. Players compete to buy and develop properties, earning rent from opponents who land on their spaces. The game includes various theme packs and customizable rules for added replayability. Up to six players can join a single game, either online or via local network.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

79%

Audience ScoreBased on 320 reviews

humor3 positive mentions

stability5 negative mentions

Fun and engaging multiplayer experience, perfect for playing with friends online or locally.
Nostalgic gameplay reminiscent of classic Monopoly, with added features and customization options.
Quick rounds and easy-to-understand mechanics make it a great time-killer for casual gaming sessions.

The game suffers from bugs and technical issues that can disrupt gameplay and frustrate players.
Graphics and user interface are outdated and lack visual appeal, making the game feel less polished.
AI opponents are often too easy to beat, and the game can feel unbalanced at times, especially in multiplayer.

graphics
32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the stunning visuals and seamless gameplay, while others criticize the outdated animations and overall aesthetic quality. Many users suggest that improvements are needed to elevate the graphics to a higher standard, as they feel it detracts from the overall experience. Despite the graphical shortcomings, some players still find the gameplay enjoyable, indicating that while the visuals may not be top-tier, they do not significantly hinder the game's fun factor.
- “The graphics are top-notch and the gameplay is seamless.”
- “I love Rento so much, I would give my first and second born for this game and then name my third child 'Rento Fortune: Online Dice Board Game (大富翁)', the graphics are stunning and the UI just blows my mind.”
- “Rento Fortune: Online Dice Board Game - this is a Monopoly-style economic game in which you will need to roll the dice, go to the cells to buy real estate and get paid for it. There are also various cards to add interest to the game, beautiful graphics, good selection of players.”
- “I played online and immediately my eyes were unpleasant from the graphics and outdated animations, but all this has not affected the gameplay because the very essence of the game I liked and its shortcomings had almost no effect on the game.”
- “If your eyes bleed at the sight of 2005 phone graphics, then this game isn't for you.”
- “The animations and graphics in this game are actually a joke.”
gameplay
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18%
65%
18%
The gameplay of Rento Fortune is largely reminiscent of Monopoly, featuring intuitive mechanics that will feel familiar to veterans of the classic board game. While it offers a variety of play modes and an online component, some players have noted issues with the user interface and graphics, which can detract from the experience. Overall, the game is appreciated for its engaging mechanics and continuous updates, making it a solid choice for casual gamers despite some technical shortcomings.
- “Familiar gameplay: if you're a Monopoly veteran, you'll feel right at home with Rento Fortune's core mechanics.”
- “The variety of play modes and quick gameplay make it a decent option for casual gamers.”
- “The fact that Rento did not do that and just worked on game mechanics is what made me appreciate and buy it in the first place.”
- “While the online component is a plus, the core gameplay doesn't stray far from Monopoly.”
- “I played online and immediately my eyes were unpleasant from the graphics and outdated animations, but all this has not affected the gameplay because the very essence of the game I liked and its shortcomings had almost no effect on the game.”
- “Gladly I'm a Chinese player who reads both reviews and English, unlike the devs themselves who basically can't read what Chinese players are giving feedback about (UI, bugs, art, boring gameplay).”
stability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
83%
The game's stability has received mixed reviews, with some users reporting minor bugs and glitches that can disrupt gameplay, including server disconnections and issues that require restarts. However, others have noted that it is one of the more polished and better-functioning titles on the platform, suggesting a varied experience among players.
- “It is highly polished and bug-free.”
- “The game runs smoothly without any crashes or glitches.”
- “I appreciate how stable the gameplay is; it never lags or stutters.”
- “Yes, it is fairly buggy, which is frankly disgraceful for a paid game of this age.”
- “Sure, you can randomly disconnect from a server, and yeah occasionally a game won't let anyone make a move so you have to restart, and yeah it doesn't work super well, but it's the least buggy, most complete, best functioning game on this damn platform.”
- “Absolutely terrible and buggy.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely appreciated, with players finding it simple yet effective, often comparing it to Monopoly but with a funnier twist. The achievements also contribute to the comedic experience, eliciting laughter and enjoyment.
- “This game is funny, simple, and good.”
- “It's like Monopoly, but funnier.”
- “The achievements are very funny, haha!”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
67%
The music in the game is generally described as pleasant and diverse, featuring a variety of languages, including Chinese. However, some players find it repetitive and annoying, expressing frustration over the lack of options to adjust or mute the music, which detracts from their overall experience.
- “Starting the game, I immediately hear pleasant music that is easy on the ears, along with a huge variety of languages available in this game (even Chinese is included).”
- “The music in this game is fantastic and really enhances the overall experience.”
- “When I ran the game, I immediately noticed the incomplete menu and couldn't find the settings to adjust the music. It was really annoying, and I couldn't turn it down or off.”
- “This game would be the greatest thing in the world if I could turn off the elevator music at the start.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
150%
The game's optimization is generally considered decent, with some minor bugs that do not significantly detract from the experience. However, players have noted that performance on PC is lacking, with lower FPS compared to mobile devices. Overall, the game still manages to evoke positive emotions despite these issues.
- “I like monopoly games, and this game is not as bad as I thought. Yes, there are some bugs, but they are not so critical. The optimization is not bad, and the game itself leaves only good emotions.”
- “The game suffers from severe optimization issues, resulting in low PC performance; the FPS on PC is even lower than on some mobile devices.”
- “Despite having a powerful gaming rig, I experience frequent frame drops and stuttering, which is unacceptable for a game of this caliber.”
- “The optimization is so poor that it feels like the game was designed for outdated hardware, making it frustrating to play on modern systems.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
Users generally appreciate the atmosphere of the game, describing it as enjoyable and atmospheric, contributing positively to the overall experience.
- “I like the atmosphere.”
- “The game has a truly atmospheric design.”
- “The overall ambiance immerses you completely.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game features a classic Monopoly experience without any in-app purchases or microtransactions, allowing players to enjoy the game with both AI and human opponents without additional costs.
- “It is a classic Monopoly game without in-app purchases, allowing play with AI and humans.”
- “There are no microtransactions like in other casual games.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The storyline has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with users rating it as a -5, indicating significant dissatisfaction with its quality and execution.
- “The storyline is incredibly weak and fails to engage the player.”
- “I found the plot to be predictable and lacking in depth.”
- “The character development is minimal, making it hard to care about their journeys.”