Puck

About

Puck is a multiplayer sport game. It was developed by NS7 and was released on January 4, 2025. It received positive reviews from players.

Puck is a fast-paced, physics-driven hockey game blending skill-based controls with dynamic, unpredictable gameplay. Whether playing solo or in multiplayer PvP, teamwork and precision passing create intense, fun, and competitive matches. Its fluid mechanics and realistic physics make every game a thrilling and humorous sports experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

86%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,985 reviews

gameplay40 positive mentions

music3 negative mentions

Fun and addictive gameplay with a high skill ceiling, making it rewarding to improve.
Great for playing with friends, offering chaotic and entertaining matches.
Active developer support and community engagement, with frequent updates and improvements.

Steep learning curve and difficult controls can frustrate new players.
Lag and server issues can hinder the online experience, making matches feel unresponsive.
Toxic community behavior, including harassment and vote-kicking, can detract from the enjoyment.

gameplay
108 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
37%
57%
6%
The gameplay is characterized by its engaging mechanics and realistic physics, offering a steep learning curve that rewards practice and mastery. While some players find the controls initially awkward and the online experience can suffer from lag, many appreciate the depth and fun of mastering the game's unique mechanics. Overall, it combines fast-paced action with a community-driven experience, making it both addictive and enjoyable for those who invest the time to learn.
- “Control every move, pass, and shot with realistic puck physics, dynamic player movement, and thrilling gameplay.”
- “The combination of solid mechanics, responsive controls, and dynamic physics creates a game that's both fun to pick up and play and rewarding to master.”
- “Puck is one of those games that’s deceptively simple at first glance but quickly hooks you with its addictive, fast-paced gameplay.”
- “Game terrible mechanics are like trying to piss with no hands.”
- “Gameplay feels repetitive quickly, with little to no real sense of progression.”
- “The giant downside is that the online gameplay just isn't what you would like it to be, nothing like playing in practice, insane delay in movement, laggy gameplay though I was 144 fps, and I'm talking about 75ms lobbies.”
humor
34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely praised, particularly when playing with friends, as the chaotic gameplay and frustrating controls lead to hilarious moments and memorable experiences. Players find the physics and unexpected mishaps to be a source of laughter, making the game enjoyable even for those who struggle with its mechanics. Overall, the comedic aspect is a significant draw, contributing to a fun and lighthearted atmosphere, especially in multiplayer settings.
- “Once at a playable point, gathering up at least four to six people is a blast and incredibly hilarious.”
- “This game is hilarious; the frustrating controls just make the game 10x better.”
- “Absolutely hilariously fun and rewarding game.”
graphics
32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
72%
9%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the clean, low-poly aesthetic that runs smoothly on various hardware, while others criticize the visuals as bland and poorly optimized, likening them to low-quality games. Despite the graphical shortcomings, many agree that the engaging gameplay and physics compensate for the lack of cutting-edge visuals. Overall, while the graphics may not be a standout feature, they are deemed sufficient for the game's enjoyable experience.
- “Puck proves that you don't need cutting-edge graphics to deliver a thrilling and engaging hockey experience.”
- “Simple yet stylish visuals: the game embraces a clean, low-poly aesthetic that's easy on the eyes and runs smoothly on a variety of hardware.”
- “The graphics are clean and the sound effects are spot-on, enhancing the overall arcade feel of the game.”
- “This game is the most poorly optimized, laggy piece of crap I've ever had the misfortune of playing, which is quite frankly ridiculous considering the graphics are on par with a poorly made Roblox game.”
- “Visuals are bland and uninspired.”
- “My only minor complaints or drawbacks are its basic graphics and somewhat limited goalie controls.”
music
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
49%
38%
The game's music features an upbeat electronic soundtrack that enhances the fast-paced gameplay and maintains high energy levels, contributing to an adrenaline-fueled experience. However, some players note that the music can become repetitive during extended play sessions, and there are hopes for additional tracks in the future.
- “The soundtrack features upbeat electronic music that perfectly complements the game's fast pace, adding to the overall adrenaline rush.”
- “I'm just saying, right now, the game doesn't even have music lol.”
- “The soundtrack is upbeat and keeps the energy high, but it might start to feel repetitive during longer sessions.”
- “Hope there’s more to come with this game because there’s a lot of potential, even if it’s just more visual stuff and music, etc.”
optimization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
Overall, the game's optimization is a mixed bag; while it features a clean, low-poly aesthetic that runs smoothly on various hardware, players report significant issues with multiplayer performance, including host advantages and frustrating lag for non-hosts. Additionally, stuttering and random lag spikes detract from the experience, leading to a potentially frustrating gameplay environment.
- “From practice drills to heated game-time pressure, this puck delivers top-tier performance every single time.”
- “Simple yet stylish visuals: the game embraces a clean, low-poly aesthetic that's easy on the eyes and runs smoothly on a variety of hardware.”
- “The only downside to the game in its current state is the multiplayer performance: the host of the game has an extreme advantage, whereas the lag for non-hosts is incredibly frustrating.”
- “Good game with a serious issue with stuttering/random lag spikes, but you get used to it.”
- “But the lag and stuttering issues cause the game to become some sort of a rage game.”
emotional
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
While some users criticize the game's controls and overall quality, others highlight its emotional impact, comparing it favorably to the nostalgic feelings evoked by games like Rocket League. The heartfelt design by Nils Asejevs resonates with players, creating a strong emotional connection despite gameplay flaws.
- “And let’s not forget the emotional side of it.”
- “Thank you so much Nils Asejevs for designing such a heartfelt game.”
- “This game makes me feel the same way Rocket League made me feel when I first started playing it.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The reviews indicate that the game lacks a significant story, with one user humorously noting that they acquired it for free and found no narrative to engage with. Overall, players seem to agree that the game does not offer a compelling or meaningful storyline.
- “No story.”
- “Made my friend get it and same story.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's monetization includes microtransactions that are not intrusive and do not create a pay-to-win scenario, making it acceptable for a free game. However, concerns arise from the developers' lack of transparency and the apparent cloning of another game without proper credit to the original creator.
- “Yes, it does have some microtransactions, but they are very out of your face. None of them seem to be pay-to-win, and the game is free.”
- “This game is not the same as it looks in the ads!”
- “Which is totally fine, up until the point that the developers completely cloned the game, added monetization, and are not even close to being upfront or crediting the original developer, Cryptic Sea.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be extensive and time-consuming, often requiring significant dedication to improve skills and farm resources. While some enjoy the challenge of clip and aura farming, many feel that the learning curve can be frustrating, especially when faced with highly skilled opponents. Overall, grinding is seen as a necessary but tedious part of the gameplay experience.
- “Of course anyone could sit there and learn to play this game, but the learning process will be a long and tedious one and won't be fun while being clowned on by unstoppable sweats.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
Users highlight that the game "Puck" features engaging and impressive replayability, making it enjoyable to play multiple times despite its simple premise.
- “Engaging and replayable gameplay.”
- “Replayability: despite its simple premise, Puck offers impressive replayability.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
Overall, the game is considered stable for an early access title, with minimal bugs reported; however, players have noted clumsy controls and the typical quirks associated with limited content, primarily a server browser.
- “Very early access, but stable and not too buggy. Just be prepared to deal with the usual quirks.”
- “The controls are clumsy and the game is riddled with bugs.”
- “Frequent crashes make it nearly unplayable.”
- “I experienced constant lag and stability issues throughout my gameplay.”
character development
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
Character development is marked by vibrant, cartoony designs and exaggerated animations that enhance the overall action and engagement in the game.
- “The character designs are cartoony, with exaggerated moves and animations that bring the action to life.”
- “The character development feels shallow and lacks depth, making it hard to connect with the protagonists.”
- “I found the character arcs predictable and uninspired, leaving me wanting more complexity.”
- “The dialogue is often clichéd, which detracts from the overall character growth and believability.”