Skip to main content
Project Entropy Game Cover

About

Project Entropy is a single player and multiplayer role playing game with fantasy and science fiction themes. It was developed by FunPlus International AG and was released on April 16, 2024. It received neutral reviews from players.

A new planet awaits! Fast! Ready your warship. Let's establish a landing zone!

Skip User Reviews

45%
Audience ScoreBased on 780 reviews
graphics57 positive mentions
monetization38 negative mentions

  • Gameplay does not require waiting time for building upgrades which is appreciated by busy players.
  • Graphics and character designs are praised for being detailed and visually attractive.
  • Game offers a variety of features including base building, hero/vehicle progression, and PvP/Alliance mechanics, providing depth to the gameplay.
  • Game is heavily pay-to-win causing significant imbalance and frustration for free-to-play players.
  • Numerous bugs and glitches including crashing, freezing, stuck progression, and issues with chat functionality significantly impact gameplay and player experience.
  • Developers have poor customer support with delayed or no responses, and frequent server issues, alongside controversial mechanics like seasonal resets erasing player progress.
  • graphics
    82 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's graphics are widely praised for their high quality, crisp visuals, detailed animations, and appealing design, often considered a standout feature that enhances the overall experience. However, some users note occasional graphical glitches and performance issues at high settings. While the graphics are generally seen as superior and visually impressive for mobile strategy games, a few reviewers find the style repetitive or mismatched with the game’s sci-fi theme.

    • “I never thought that this game would be so superior to other strategy games. It has no match in terms of gameplay and powerful graphics. This game works very well both in terms of excellent graphics and gameplay, and it has a very unique design that I really liked. It's really fun, thanks.”
    • “Graphically it looks amazing... the gameplay is also fun (it's a mix of idle game and base building).”
    • “1) This game is awesome, the graphics were made with cool details, superb animation and effects.”
    • “Graphical glitches, gameplay glitches, server glitches, game crashes, the list goes on.”
    • “They prioritize graphics over optimizing the game performance.”
    • “This game has very high graphics settings but causes lag; it needs fixing along with many bugs and glitches.”
  • gameplay
    72 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Gameplay reviews are highly mixed, with some praising its fun, engaging mechanics, crisp graphics, and strategic depth, while others criticize frequent bugs, server issues, and repetitive or tedious progression. Several users note the gameplay differs significantly from advertised content, with a pay-to-win feel and lack of competitive challenge. Overall, the gameplay appeals to fans of casual base-building and strategic games but may frustrate players expecting deeper, glitch-free experiences.

    • “That said, the characters were amusing, the gameplay and graphics for what they are were very crisp and on-point; a game worth playing - just not for me.”
    • “A game with fantastic potential and satisfying gameplay.”
    • “Great RTS with very good graphic and gameplay.”
    • “Graphical glitches, gameplay glitches, server glitches, game crashes, the list goes on.”
    • “It starts out good, tutorial wise, but then you realise it's all, do this, then this, then that, but you have to do this before that, there's no freedom whatsoever, it's basically a clicker game with fancy graphics and loooong storytelling in between, was expecting Starcraft type gameplay, this is not it.”
    • “Don't expect any support or any update ever, even the basic game mechanics don't function.”
  • story
    66 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story is generally regarded as decent and enjoyable, with a sci-fi setting and well-developed characters, though many players find it repetitive, overly linear, or lacking depth and freedom. Several users report being stuck or frustrated by mission bugs and progression blockers, while others feel the narrative is overwhelmed by gameplay grind or pay-to-win mechanics. Overall, the story has potential but is hampered by design issues and insufficient content variety.

    • “The game has a beautiful storyline, and the sequence of the battle is also good. Sounds, storyline, battle mechanics, and almost everything have been meticulously well thought out and well made.”
    • “Developers and writers really thought about the story, characters, and how to guide players through this cool sci-fi strategy game.”
    • “Great story, high audio quality, well-developed dialogue, high-quality graphics, easy game controls, and highly adaptive mechanics.”
    • “The walkthrough is long and tedious, there are ten thousand games like this just with a different story line, too basic, too easy, too boring.”
    • “Story is vague on who you are and why you're there.”
    • “Zero storyline.”
  • monetization
    48 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users overwhelmingly criticize the game's monetization for aggressive, overpriced in-app purchases and misleading or deceptive advertisements that misrepresent gameplay. Many describe it as a pay-to-win, cash grab with frequent ads, glitches in purchases, and grinding mechanics designed to push spending. However, a minority note minimal ads and fair monetization, praising the experience when not pressured to pay.

    • “The game has no ads and is not pay-to-win; you can easily boost your combat power. Overall, it's a well-made game with no forced purchases to survive.”
    • “No aggressive monetization; the game offers a few unpopulated areas so you're not constantly attacked, and the story is decent.”
    • “There are no microtransactions to speed up downtime, which avoids frustration and shows restraint in monetization.”
    • “Overly aggressive monetization with ridiculously overpriced in-app purchases up to €109 (!).”
    • “Starts off great, about 1 hour in, you come to a complete halt because of outrageous timers on certain enemies, killing these enemies will give you the resources needed to upgrade your base, of course spend real money and you can play, so it's completely pay to play, another disgusting cash grab.”
    • “It was really cool at the beginning of the season a lot like command and conquer but then quickly realized it went down the toilet with microtransactions, constant updates, and new gear that you have to constantly purchase to keep up with the game.”
  • stability
    35 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game suffers from pervasive bugs, glitches, frequent crashes, and server issues that severely impact stability and gameplay experience. Updates often introduce new problems without adequately fixing existing ones, and customer support is reported as unresponsive and ineffective. Despite its potential and engaging concept, these stability issues have led to significant player frustration and declining active user numbers.

    • “Graphical glitches, gameplay glitches, server glitches, game crashes, the list goes on.”
    • “Plagued with bugs and glitches, every update adds 3 new ones while fixing 1; at the same time, the phone runs hotter.”
    • “Chat is really buggy losing lines of text in region and alliance chat, game occasionally crashes, dead heroes sometimes can't track properly back to your base once it had been destroyed and relocated, troops get stuck in certain areas of the map, base health is way too low and bases are destroyed easily, players get an error when trying to leave an alliance etc. This game needs a lot of work but the concept is fun!”
  • grinding
    13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Grinding in the game is often described as tedious, repetitive, and heavy on mindless clicking, with slow progress especially for free-to-play players. While instant upgrades and PvP elements add some variety, many find the gameplay boring and reliant on joining strong alliances or spending money to avoid excessive grind. Overall, the experience can feel like a reskinned, cluttered city builder with limited resource farming and a steep learning curve.

    • “Heavy mindless grinding/clicking is required.”
    • “If you aren't in the big established alliance, you are farming cannon fodder before you even learn to play the game.”
    • “I'm level 12 and have hit the paywall and grinding is very boring.”
  • humor
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game receives mixed feedback, with some users finding it slightly amusing, especially in certain situations, while others feel it is overshadowed by misleading advertising and lacks originality. Overall, the humor is seen as a minor positive aspect but not a standout feature.

    • “I think the only positive was the graphic, and a little bit of humor.”
    • “It could be funny and helping when we going to some place.”
  • optimization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game shows optimization issues, prioritizing graphics over smooth performance, resulting in subpar gameplay on low-end devices with 2GB RAM.

    • “They prioritize graphics over optimizing game performance.”
    • “They prioritize graphics over optimizing the game performance.”
    • “Just wish performance on low-end devices with 2GB RAM was better.”
    • “It has some optimization issues.”
  • character development
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The character development is highly praised for its detailed and thoughtfully crafted designs, reflecting the developers' dedication and passion.

  • music
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music is praised for its quality and complements the game's graphics and sound effects well, enhancing the overall experience.

    • “Graphics are well done as well as effects and soundtrack.”
  • emotional
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users find the emotional aspect lacking depth, criticizing it for focusing on superficial or immature themes rather than showcasing genuine combat skills and meaningful emotional engagement.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Project Entropy

2h Median play time
2h Average play time
2-2h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Project Entropy
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Project Entropy is a role playing game with fantasy and science fiction themes.

Project Entropy is available on PC, Phone, Windows, Tablet and others.

On average players spend around 2 hours playing Project Entropy.

Project Entropy was released on April 16, 2024.

Project Entropy was developed by FunPlus International AG.

Project Entropy has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked Project Entropy for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

Project Entropy is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Rise of Kingdoms: Lost Crusade, The Walking Dead: Survivors, State of Survival: Zombie War, Call of Dragons, Sea of Conquest: Pirate War and others.