Skip to main content

Project 5: Sightseer

66%Game Brain Score
gameplay, graphics
grinding, story
66% User Score Based on 632 reviews

Platforms

PCWindowsLinuxMac OS

About

In "Project 5: Sightseer," players become a drone pilot, navigating a futuristic city while taking photos of landmarks for clients. With a variety of drones and upgrades to choose from, players must balance speed and photo quality while avoiding obstacles and security measures. Successful missions earn rewards and reputation points, unlocking new challenges and customization options in this immersive, open-world flight simulation game.

Project 5: Sightseer screenshot
Project 5: Sightseer screenshot
Project 5: Sightseer screenshot
Project 5: Sightseer screenshot
Project 5: Sightseer screenshot
Project 5: Sightseer screenshot
Project 5: Sightseer screenshot
Project 5: Sightseer screenshot
Project 5: Sightseer screenshot
Project 5: Sightseer screenshot
Project 5: Sightseer screenshot
+24

66%
Audience ScoreBased on 632 reviews
gameplay24 positive mentions
grinding38 negative mentions

  • Fabulous visuals and beautiful environments that enhance the exploration experience.
  • Engaging gameplay with a mix of resource gathering, base building, and vehicle upgrades.
  • Active developer support and community engagement, with frequent updates and responsiveness to player feedback.
  • Slow start with a steep learning curve, making it difficult for new players to get into the game.
  • Vehicle handling is clunky and frustrating, especially in rough terrain, which detracts from the overall experience.
  • Limited content and repetitive gameplay can lead to boredom, especially in single-player mode.
  • gameplay
    94 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with players appreciating the fun driving mechanics and deep upgrade system, but criticizing various mechanics as poorly designed and unbalanced. While the exploration-driven gameplay is addictive and visually appealing, many feel the game lacks meaningful content and suffers from bugs that hinder the overall experience. Overall, it shows potential as a hidden gem, but requires further refinement and additional features to enhance long-term engagement.

    • “The graphics are really very good for an amateur title and the gameplay itself is fairly nice; driving the vehicle around is fun, and there's a great and deep upgrade/progression/growth element.”
    • “Its tech tree- and exploration-driven gameplay is very addictive.”
    • “Everything feels pretty good, even if it isn't constant action and the skill is more in your logistical planning than twitch gameplay.”
    • “Man, I want to like it, it's really pretty and conceptually fun, but so many of the mechanics just suck absolute ass.”
    • “The game is clearly not finished. There are bugs like with sensors not working as expected, making them impossible to use, causing issues with the core gameplay where you waste resources instead of managing them and run out of them way faster than what you should have done.”
    • “What the game needed was more things to actually do and mechanics to enable players to help create content via PvP or at least more AI/automated 'empires' expanding and giving you targets to fight over territory. What we got instead was an instanced tower defense kind of game where you can spawn in a wave of attackers to test your base/guns against - rather pointless.”
  • graphics
    74 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game have received widespread praise for their beauty and detail, with many users noting the impressive visuals, especially for an amateur title. While the game runs smoothly on high settings and features a well-designed world, some players have pointed out issues with optimization and limited graphics options. Overall, the visuals are considered one of the standout aspects of the game, contributing to an engaging experience despite some technical shortcomings.

    • “The graphics are beautiful, and I have passively explored a world for hours.”
    • “Visuals are jaw-dropping for a game of its size, with the most screenshots I've ever taken in a game.”
    • “The graphics are gorgeous, the vehicle physics strike a good balance between realistic and fun, and the research tree makes a good amount of sense.”
    • “There seems to be a problem with how the graphic engine works.”
    • “Optimization and graphics options are slightly lacking and my 1050 card can sometimes struggle, but such is expected in early access.”
    • “Huge map, no limit to how many players can play on 1 server, launched into early access with a lot of features already in, base building-resource gathering, fun to play with friends but crossing certain terrains is frustrating and tedious without upgrades, limited graphics options.”
  • grinding
    38 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it tedious and time-consuming, especially in the early stages where resource gathering can feel overwhelming. While some appreciate the rewarding nature of the grind and enjoy the challenge it presents, others feel it detracts from the overall experience, particularly for solo players. Overall, the game seems to cater more to those who enjoy extensive grinding, while others may find it frustrating and unengaging.

    • “Except for the first two upgrades, they require extensive grinding that are still not achievable after 30 hours.”
    • “Only real complaint I have is how hard it can be to find some resources that you need to get started on a base, making for a really long, difficult, and grindy first 10 hours or so of gameplay.”
    • “Personally, I feel like it was a waste of time, and unless you have a posse of people willing to play this with you, I'm sure you'll get sick of the tedious driving around for hours searching for things to mine.”
  • story
    36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is widely criticized for its lack of depth and coherence, with many players noting that it feels shallow and disconnected from the gameplay experience. While there are quests and NPC interactions that add some liveliness, the overall narrative is deemed insufficient, leading to a reliance on player-driven experiences rather than a structured storyline. Many reviewers suggest that incorporating a more robust narrative could enhance the game's appeal, despite acknowledging its enjoyable base-building mechanics.

    • “I enjoyed this game, but it would be improved by having a story element and quests.”
    • “The quests and voiceovers for the NPCs are lively and often amusing.”
    • “Take on NPC quests to further your expansion into the world!”
    • “The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design, etc. to the game.”
    • “It's relatively shallow and has no story that I was able to detect.”
    • “Unfortunately, no amount of story is going to fix that.”
  • optimization
    24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with some players experiencing significant performance issues, particularly with explosion effects that hinder gameplay. While early access users noted that load times are fast and multiplayer performance is commendable, others reported struggles with graphics settings on lower-end hardware. Overall, there is potential for improvement, and many hope for better optimization in future updates.

    • “Will probably check it out again in the future once the optimization is worked in, looks like a promising game!”
    • “Also the performance on it is amazing, early access or no, load times were incredibly fast and there were no lag issues at all.”
    • “Multiplayer performance is remarkable!”
    • “Poorly optimized explosion effects causing matches to grind to a halt regardless of computer specifications.”
    • “Optimization and graphics options are slightly lacking, and my 1050 card can sometimes struggle, but such is expected in early access.”
    • “There are some performance issues with the Linux client at the moment.”
  • stability
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is highly inconsistent, with some players experiencing severe freezing issues and crashes, while others report a relatively bug-free experience, especially in early access. Despite a few graphical glitches and some design flaws in vehicle mechanics, the developer's commitment to quality is noted positively by some users. Overall, opinions on stability vary significantly, with a mix of frustration and satisfaction among players.

    • “The developer is very committed to quality in his work, so I found even early access to be a very bug-free experience.”
    • “It's the most stable and bug-free early access title I've come across.”
    • “The developer is very committed to quality in his work, so I found even early access to be a very bug-free experience.”
    • “Terrible buggy mess, don't waste your time.”
    • “So whenever I try to start a world, the game just freezes, and if I try to click anywhere, it just tells me it's not responding. This happens every time and I don't know why. I know it's not my PC because my PC can handle stuff like No Man's Sky and Space Engineers. Has anyone else experienced this problem?”
    • “It has nearly no PvE content and right now it is a bit buggy.”
  • music
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has received widespread acclaim, with many players highlighting it as a standout feature that enhances the overall experience and atmosphere. Reviewers describe the soundtrack as amazing and relaxing, effectively driving players to explore the game world. While some mention minor criticisms, the consensus is that the music significantly contributes to the game's appeal.

    • “The music is amazing and helps you relax into the world you're exploring.”
    • “This $8 game got one thing right, and that is driving you to push forward, accompanied by some really awesome music.”
    • “Love the game so far: great pace, unreal soundtrack, beautiful graphics, and it just stays fresh.”
    • “A good game with an amazing soundtrack and art, ruined by something as simple as the movement controls.”
    • “Decent music.”
    • “The music alone makes it worth a look.”
  • atmosphere
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its beauty and peacefulness, enhancing the overall experience, especially for players who enjoy construction, research, and RPG elements. The inclusion of soothing game music further enriches this captivating environment, making it a highly enjoyable setting for multiplayer interactions.

    • “The atmosphere of the game is amazing and very peaceful.”
    • “The concept of it is great, the atmosphere is beautiful, and the fact you can easily play with friends makes this very enjoyable.”
    • “Can recommend this game if you really enjoy construction, researching, RPG, sandbox, and a very interesting atmosphere.”
  • humor
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is derived from the absurdity of its mechanics, particularly the frustrating driving experience, which leads to a mix of laughter and exasperation. Players find the concept of scavenging for garbage amusing, though the execution may provoke more frustration than fun. Overall, the humor is a blend of dark commentary and slapstick moments, reflecting on the game's low price point and production quality.

    • “Well, you can attempt to hilariously drive around to find garbage laying around to fill your inventory if you like, but I do not recommend it as you are likely just going to end up screaming because the damn vehicle cannot drive straight, or even at all.”
  • replayability
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers enjoyable experiences in single-player or duo modes, but many users feel that it lacks significant replay value beyond initial playthroughs.

    • “Playing it as a single player/duo non-conflict building game will net you a reasonable amount of enjoyment, but there's no real replay value after that, sadly.”
  • monetization
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game is not clearly defined, leading to mixed perceptions among users regarding its effectiveness and potential for future advertising. While it is not positioned as an MMO, considering it through that lens may highlight both its strengths and weaknesses in terms of monetization.

  • character development
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews indicate a lack of character development in the game, with players expressing disappointment over the absence of meaningful progression and content after completing the initial objectives. This has led to a sense of stagnation, as players feel there is little to engage with once the game’s features are fully unlocked.

    • “After a week of binge-playing, having unlocked everything, I find there's nothing really to do, as there's no real PvE-type content, no character development, and our base was 'done'.”

Buy Project 5: Sightseer

25h Median play time
32h Average play time
7-50h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 18 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like Project 5: Sightseer

Planet Nomads Image
Osiris: New Dawn Image
Planet Explorers Image
Empyrion: Galactic Survival Image
Grav Image