Skip to main content

Pocket Survivor: Expansion

Pocket Survivor: Expansion Game Cover
78%Game Brain Score
gameplay, music
monetization, story
78% User Score Based on 404 reviews

Platforms

TabletAndroidPhoneMobile Platform
Pocket Survivor: Expansion Game Cover

About

Pocket Survivor: Expansion is a single player simulation game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Text simulator of Post-Apocalyptic Survival world. Wasteland Survivor Standoff

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

78%
Audience ScoreBased on 404 reviews
gameplay9 positive mentions
monetization33 negative mentions

  • Engaging and addictive gameplay loop with a fun survival experience and good balance.
  • Diverse factions, items, weapons, and customization options including perks and base upgrades add depth.
  • Good developer responsiveness with ongoing updates and potential for future content expansions.
  • Game is plagued by numerous bugs affecting quests, trading, inventory, saving progress, and Play Pass compatibility.
  • Extremely slow and grindy progression including scarce experience gain, high level requirements for equipment, and limited skill point use.
  • Excessive ads and some pay-to-win mechanics negatively impact the gameplay experience and frustrate free players.
  • monetization
    37 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Monetization in the game is a major point of contention, with many users frustrated by frequent and intrusive ads, especially during sleep and travel, which disrupt gameplay and feel excessive. Despite some praising the ad integration with in-game rewards as creative, numerous players report bugs with ad removal after purchase and view the monetization approach as greedy or pay-to-win. Overall, the heavy ad presence negatively impacts the experience for many, even as some acknowledge the game's quality outside of monetization issues.

    • “I ended up purchasing no ads again.”
    • “And there are no ads, so thank you :)”
    • “Game is ridiculously hard, in a good way, I like the grind, I like the gameplay loop, but there's too many ads, it's definitely a pay-to-win game, in a tough fight?”
    • “The developer is very greedy and wants to shovel ads down your throat, that or 'convince' you to spend money.”
    • “The amount of ads for any amount of progress is ridiculous!”
  • gameplay
    34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is generally praised for its engaging loop, survival mechanics, and challenging grind, though many users find it overly grindy, punishing, and hindered by bugs and intrusive ads. Several players highlight the need for improvements in crafting, quest integration, faction depth, and better accommodation for free-to-play or play pass users. While the core gameplay shows promise and is enjoyable early on, it requires polishing, expanded content, and balance adjustments to fully realize its potential.

    • “I gotta say it's fun for early gameplay but as you level up the perks that you can unlock is only 2 which depends on your starting class.”
    • “It takes a while to gain enough experience points to level up, but all around good gameplay.”
    • “The game is very scuffed and very grindy, but I like the gameplay loop.”
    • “Added to play pass but breaks the game: can't add friends, can't earn gold caps, so cannot buy anything that uses them. Basically pointless being added to play pass. Needs fixing to accommodate play pass players, removing, or reporting to Google, as many mechanics are not usable.”
    • “Honestly, this is such an interesting idea for a game and I like some elements like leveling and gear and skill books, but other than that this game is way too grindy and punishing, especially for dying. If you die, you either lose all your progress or watch an ad to keep your character but lose all your items, or pay to keep everything, which is so dumb. If this got fixed and some mechanics changed, this would be better.”
    • “Super confusing and clunky gameplay.”
  • story
    19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players consistently note the lack of quests and a more developed story, expressing a strong desire for additional narrative content, faction-related quests, and endgame depth. While the gameplay and art are praised, many hope for future updates to introduce quests, richer story elements, and more varied challenges to enhance engagement. Overall, the game is well-received but would benefit greatly from expanded story-driven content.

    • “I am a fan of the Pocket Survivor series, this is like the second gem but better in most ways. I like more factions, more skirmishes, more story, the bunker, and the tie-in with advertisements to in-game loot. I've never seen a game tie in advertising to make it make sense; it's genius.”
    • “Fairly good game if you flush out the map fully and add another grade of weapon/armor and just a bit more end game and flesh out the story as you play or at least have an ending would be very nice. Maybe not a true 5 star but games don't have to be masterpieces, some just have to fill an itch. Still would be a 9/10 if you polish it for a bit, add a good 20-40 or so hours of gameplay and maybe some challenge modes like you have to fight every enemy or something.”
    • “Wish the story was slightly more in depth because factions feel like they are just whoever sounds cool. It feels like the gameplay loop is good and the art is nice. I just wish there were more content with factions that built story.”
    • “Zero quests in the game appearing either. Had one at the very beginning but I have raised up 12 levels and unlocked 9 areas with no more quests, and yes, I completed the first.”
    • “Wish the story was slightly more in depth because factions feel like they are just whoever sounds cool. The gameplay loop is good and art is nice, but I just wish there were more content with factions that built story.”
    • “Fairly good game if you flush out the map fully and add another grade of weapon/armor and just a bit more end game and flesh out the story as you play or at least have an ending would be very nice. Maybe not a true 5 star but games don't have to be masterpieces; some just have to fill an itch. Still would be a 9/10 if you polish it for a bit, add a good 20-40 or so hours of gameplay and maybe some challenge modes like you have to fight every enemy or something.”
  • music
    10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users praise the game's music for its nostalgic and engaging radio soundtracks that enhance tense moments and overall atmosphere. Many express a desire for more music variety, the ability to add custom tracks, and curiosity about the specific songs featured. Overall, the music is seen as a strong, enjoyable element contributing positively to the gaming experience.

    • “Actually well done, I like the background music during tense moments before possible death. The old school mechanics plus I'm excited for quests to be added!”
    • “Interaction required, interesting mechanics used, good music... I like it ”
    • “It's way too early to give a good review but I love the radio soundtracks.”
    • “I'm also still waiting for new radio music.”
    • “Can you at least put an option for us to add our own radio music?”
    • “I would really love to know the songs used in the radio, please.”
  • grinding
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game features a compelling gameplay loop and interesting elements like leveling and gear, but the grinding is excessively punishing, especially due to harsh death penalties that can result in significant progress loss or costly pay-to-keep options. This grind can be frustrating, particularly for acquiring high-tier mythic items, and detracts from the overall experience despite the core gameplay being enjoyable.

    • “Honestly this is such an interesting idea for a game and I like some of the elements like leveling and gear and skill books, but other than that this game is way too grindy and punishing, especially for dying. If you die, you either lose all your progress, watch an ad to keep your character but lose all your items, or pay to keep everything, which is so dumb. If this got fixed and some mechanics changed, this would be better.”
    • “I personally absolutely love the gameplay but after losing 3 expensive characters that took hours of grinding each, I'm gonna give this game 4 stars. It also cost me my sanity.”
    • “Lost my account after months or days of grinding, help me.”
  • stability
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Stability experiences vary widely among users; some report frequent bugs and freezing issues, especially with intrusive pop-up offers disrupting gameplay, while others have played for days without encountering any problems. Overall, the game can be buggy at times, but retains an enjoyable experience despite occasional glitches.

    • “The game is good if you have nothing to do but it's buggy from time to time. There's a bug with the pop-up offer that tells you to buy items, and it always pops up during battles, causing my game to freeze, rendering it unplayable and killing my run.”
    • “Interesting game but it does not even let me play it normally. It's Russian and it wants to make me pay for the tutorial. It has tons of bugs and glitches.”
    • “Buggy for Play Pass players.”
  • graphics
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics receive mixed feedback, with some users finding them dull or in need of improvement, while others appreciate the current visual style. Overall, the visuals are considered functional but could benefit from enhancements to make the game more engaging.

    • “I really like the graphics of the game.”
    • “Pretty fun game, but some visuals could really help it feel less dull.”
    • “Please, devs... fix a lot of everything, including the visuals of the game.”
    • “Overall the game is nice, it just needs changes that are doable for both free-to-play and pay-to-win players, and the graphics are kinda bad too but still not that bad.”
  • humor
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is enhanced by amusing but poorly translated text, which adds a quirky charm. Familiar references and improved depth contribute to a more flavorful and enjoyable comedic experience compared to previous versions.

    • “The translations are bad but funny, so I can skip over them.”
    • “I see those assets, I know where they're from, funny Ash, but overall huge improvement from the last time. I've played a lot more in-depth with more flavoring in it, quite nice.”
  • emotional
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users did not specifically comment on the emotional aspect, but mentioned an issue with lighting in the shelter that affects visibility and immersion.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Pocket Survivor: Expansion

Skip Games Like Pocket Survivor: Expansion
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Pocket Survivor: Expansion is a simulation game.

Pocket Survivor: Expansion is available on Phone, Tablet, Android and Mobile Platform.

Pocket Survivor: Expansion was developed by Go Dreams.

Pocket Survivor: Expansion has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked Pocket Survivor: Expansion for its gameplay but disliked it for its monetization.

Pocket Survivor: Expansion is a single player game.

Similar games include Zombie Forest 3: Underground, Delivery From the Pain:Survive, Day R Survival: Last Survivor, Live or Die: Zombie Survival, Day R Premium and others.