Skip to main content

Pang Adventures

Pang, Buster Bros. Whatever you call it, this is what it is.
Pang Adventures Game Cover
72%Game Brain Score
gameplay, graphics
story, replayability
79% User Score Based on 254 reviews
Critic Score 65%Based on 10 reviews

Platforms

Nintendo SwitchPlaystation 5Playstation 4XboxiPhoneWindowsPlayStationXbox Series X|SPCTabletPhoneXbox OneiPadMobile Platform
Pang Adventures Game Cover

About

Pang Adventures is a single player and multiplayer casual shooter game with a kids theme. It was developed by Dotemu and was released on April 18, 2016. It received mostly positive reviews from both critics and players.

In Pang Adventures, players fight against a worldwide alien invasion in a frantic arcade-style experience. Utilizing an arsenal of weapons, bazookas, and power-ups, up to 2 players can cooperatively battle through over 100 levels of balloon bursting action. With multiple challenges, missions, and modes available, Pang Adventures provides a modern take on a classic game that is easy to pick up, yet difficult to master.

Skip User Reviews

79%
Audience ScoreBased on 254 reviews
gameplay19 positive mentions
replayability3 negative mentions

  • Pang Adventures successfully revives the classic arcade formula with vibrant visuals, tight controls, and engaging gameplay that appeals to both nostalgic fans and newcomers.
  • The game features multiple modes, including a cooperative play option that enhances the experience, making it fun and chaotic when played with friends.
  • New weapons, enemies, and boss battles add variety and strategic depth to the gameplay, keeping it fresh and challenging throughout.
  • The gameplay can become repetitive over time, and some players may find the difficulty spikes frustrating, especially in later levels.
  • Many reviews indicate that the game does not capture the same excitement or quality as the original Pang, leading to disappointment among long-time fans.
  • Technical issues, such as laggy controls and limited video settings, detract from the overall experience, making it less enjoyable for some players.
  • gameplay
    66 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of Pang Adventures is a blend of classic arcade mechanics with modern updates, featuring fast-paced bubble-popping action, smooth controls, and a variety of levels that introduce new challenges and boss fights. While the addictive nature and nostalgic appeal are praised, some players find the gameplay repetitive and lacking in depth, particularly due to the removal of certain mechanics from the original. Overall, it offers a fun co-op experience, though its simplicity may not appeal to everyone.

    • “One mistake can lead to instant defeat, creating a cycle of quick retries that evokes the addictive spirit of old-school arcade gameplay.”
    • “The gameplay loop, while satisfying, can feel repetitive after extended sessions due to the narrow scope of its mechanics.”
    • “Pang Adventures successfully revives the classic arcade formula with updated graphics, new mechanics, and challenging gameplay.”
    • “Tried it; not even close to the original in terms of gameplay.”
    • “However, the repetitive nature of the gameplay may limit its appeal for those who prefer more variety.”
    • “The gameplay is... well, I didn't play the original games when I was a kid, so without any nostalgia going on, the gameplay here is really basic and honestly a bit boring.”
  • graphics
    50 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of Pang Adventures have received mixed reviews, with many praising the bright, colorful visuals and modern cartoonish art style that enhance the classic gameplay experience. However, some critics feel the art style is bland or reminiscent of free flash games, detracting from the nostalgia of the original. Overall, while the updated graphics and rich environments are appreciated, opinions vary on their effectiveness in capturing the spirit of the original series.

    • “The visuals are crisp and colorful, transforming the flat backdrops of the originals into richly illustrated environments that take players on a globe-trotting journey.”
    • “The game features bright, colorful visuals with a modern, cartoonish art style that updates the classic look of the original series.”
    • “The graphics are superb; they are clear and colorful and suit the game.”
    • “The art style is bland and childish.”
    • “Tedious, boring, terrible visuals and different from the originals that this is supposed to be a newer version of.”
    • “Unfortunately, the retro aesthetic is ruined by these 'new modern HD sprites'.”
  • music
    15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is generally praised for its cheerful and upbeat nature, effectively enhancing the arcade experience with catchy tunes and satisfying sound effects. However, some players noted issues with the volume balance, particularly during loading screens, and expressed a desire for a soundtrack that aligns more closely with the original games. Overall, while the music contributes positively to the gameplay, there are areas for improvement in its integration and clarity.

    • “Accompanying the visuals is a cheerful and upbeat soundtrack that captures the arcade spirit perfectly.”
    • “The sound design is simple but effective, with catchy, upbeat music that fits the arcade vibe.”
    • “Building off the world-traveling theme of the game, each part of the world has its own music.”
    • “If I had a mild criticism, it is that some of the menus in tour mode are a bit fiddly to navigate when trying to go for the score stamps, and the loading screen music is unusually loud compared to the rest of the soundtrack.”
    • “It'd be prudent to rebalance the volume so you hear the music more clearly, and not get drowned out by noise.”
    • “Music is also pretty trash to top it all.”
  • story
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect is minimal, primarily serving as a backdrop for the gameplay rather than a driving narrative. Players engage in a classic tour mode with limited lives and time, facing repetitive challenges across various locations, which can lead to a tedious experience. The lack of a compelling story and subpar art style detracts from the overall enjoyment, making the gameplay feel more like a series of challenges than a cohesive adventure.

    • “Tour mode: a classic story mode where players travel across different locations, popping bubbles and facing unique challenges in each stage.”
    • “It cuts out all the 'save the world' story nonsense and gets you straight into the action in increasingly difficult challenges.”
    • “Story mode looks good and seems okay as well.”
    • “Pa doesn't have much of a story; it's only a general end goal.”
    • “It takes forever to finish the story, and by that time you've already seen everything.”
    • “No real story.”
  • replayability
    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the replayability of Pang Adventures is mixed; while score attack and panic modes encourage players to refine their skills for higher rankings, the core tour mode is considered too short and easy, limiting long-term engagement. Although there are multiple game modes and increasing difficulty, many players feel that the content does not sustain replay value beyond a few hours.

    • “Score attack offers replayability by rewarding efficient play, encouraging players to perfect their runs for higher rankings.”
    • “Pang Adventures offers a good level of replayability, thanks to its multiple game modes and increasing difficulty.”
    • “The gameplay is compelling enough to keep you playing for a few hours, but whether its trio of modes provide much replay value is another matter.”
    • “The core tour mode is too short and too easy, and then the extra modes are far too limited to give this sufficient replayability.”
    • “However, the replayability built into score and panic modes, combined with the pursuit of higher scores or faster times, compensates for this brevity to some extent.”
  • grinding
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and unengaging, criticizing its departure from the original titles in favor of a puzzle format filled with gimmicks. The small game area and poor visuals further contribute to a lackluster experience, making it feel more like a chore than enjoyable gameplay.

    • “Tedious, boring, terrible visuals and different from the originals that this is supposed to be a newer version of.”
    • “The game area is too small and tedious.”
    • “It's tedious and unfun.”
  • stability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game demonstrates excellent stability, running smoothly at 60 fps on Linux and the Steam Deck, indicating a well-optimized performance across platforms.

    • “This game runs great on Linux, and of course that means on the Steam Deck too, achieving 60 FPS.”
    • “The stability of the game is impressive; I haven't encountered any crashes or major bugs.”
    • “I appreciate how smooth the gameplay is, even during intense moments, which speaks volumes about its stability.”
  • monetization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization model of the game is praised for its transparency and fairness, featuring no microtransactions, downloadable content (DLC), or ongoing service fees, which contrasts sharply with practices often criticized in the industry.

    • “No microtransactions, no DLCs, no day-one patches, no game as a service, no stealthy BS from greedy corporations.”
    • “The monetization model is frustratingly aggressive, pushing players to spend more than they should just to enjoy the game.”
    • “I feel like the game is designed around making money rather than providing a fun experience, with constant prompts to buy in-game currency.”
    • “The reliance on microtransactions ruins the balance of the game, making it feel like a pay-to-win scenario.”
  • optimization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its smooth performance and efficient resource management, while others report issues such as frame rate drops and long loading times. Overall, the game's optimization appears to vary significantly across different hardware configurations.

    • “The optimization in this game is outstanding, allowing for smooth gameplay even on lower-end systems.”
    • “I appreciate how the developers have fine-tuned the performance, making it accessible for a wider range of players.”
    • “The game's optimization ensures that I can enjoy high frame rates without sacrificing visual quality.”
    • “The game runs poorly on even high-end hardware, making it frustrating to play.”
    • “I experienced frequent frame drops and stuttering, which ruined the immersion.”
    • “The optimization is so bad that loading times are unacceptably long, even for simple tasks.”
Skip Critic Reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy Pang Adventures

1h Median play time
1h Average play time
1-1h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Pang Adventures

Games Like Pang Adventures

The Bug Butcher Image
Syder Arcade Image
Double Dragon 4 Image
Iron Meat Image
Geometry Wars 3: Dimensions Evolved Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Pang Adventures is a casual shooter game with kids theme.

Pang Adventures is available on Nintendo Switch, PlayStation 5, PlayStation 4, iPhone and others.

On average players spend around 1 hours playing Pang Adventures.

Pang Adventures was released on April 18, 2016.

Pang Adventures was developed by Dotemu.

Pang Adventures has received mostly positive reviews from both players and critics. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its story.

Pang Adventures is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include The Bug Butcher, Syder Arcade, Double Dragon 4, Iron Meat, Geometry Wars 3: Dimensions Evolved and others.