Override 2: Super Mech League

Override 2 has a lot to offer prospective players. From its satisfying, enjoyable combat to its varied, colorful stages and mode options, the game has everything it needs. Except for people playing it.

54%Game Brain Score

gameplay, graphics

story, music

54% User Score Based on 80 reviews

Critic Score 60%Based on 20 reviews

Platforms

Buy Nowfrom $1.38

Buy NowGet on Steam€3.89

Buy NowGet on Xbox Games Store

Buy NowGet on Epic Games Store

About

Override 2: Super Mech League is a robot-battling game where players control giant mechs to compete in multiplayer matches or follow the story in a single-player campaign. Customize and upgrade mechs with various abilities and weapons, and engage in various game modes such as local and online multiplayer, arcade, and career mode. Experience stunning graphics and realistic physics, making the gameplay even more immersive.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

54%

Audience ScoreBased on 80 reviews

gameplay7 positive mentions

music3 negative mentions

The graphics are impressive, showcasing detailed characters and environments.
The game offers a fun local multiplayer experience with a variety of characters and special moves.
The combat mechanics are accessible and can be enjoyable for casual play, especially with friends.

The game lacks a dedicated online community, making matches against real players nearly impossible.
Many features from the original game have been removed, leading to a more simplistic and less engaging gameplay experience.
The absence of a single-player mode and a compelling story detracts from the overall experience, leaving players with repetitive bot matches.

gameplay
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
62%
12%
The gameplay of the sequel has received mixed reviews, with many players noting a shift towards simplicity that detracts from the depth and mechanics of the original game. While some enjoy the fast-paced, chaotic nature of multiplayer matches, others criticize the removal of core features and the overall lack of refinement, leading to a button-mashing experience. Despite these concerns, the game still offers fun moments, particularly in local multiplayer settings, though it feels less polished and engaging compared to its predecessor.
- “A nice mecha brawler with solid mechanics and characters that ooze personality.”
- “Game seems really good, mechanics are expanded drastically from the main game (now having various aerial attacks, etc.).”
- “Has rollback netcode, great gameplay, wide and varied cast, and a lot of possibilities both in terms of competitive play and just chaotic casual fun.”
- “Your only option is to play this crappier version with worse graphics, gameplay, characters, and baby level CPUs.”
- “They gutted the game's mechanics.”
- “We needed you to refine the mechanics you had already in the game, not take them all out and reduce it to a button-mashing simplicity.”
story
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
57%
21%
The sequel to the original game significantly reduces the narrative focus, replacing the story mode with a league-based PvP system that lacks depth and character development. Players note that while the gameplay can be enjoyable, the absence of a compelling storyline and the reliance on bot matches detracts from the overall experience. Many feel that the potential for a richer narrative was squandered, leaving the game feeling more like a tech demo than a fully realized sequel.
- “The original was a fun, story-driven homage to Pacific Rim.”
- “A compelling story.”
- “There was potential here for a story about the league and the people you meet in it, a new pilot, anything.”
- “There is not much of a story it would seem in the initial go except for 'Hi, I am your agent.'”
- “The storyline is pretty much a throwaway, but who cares?”
- “Story mode is gone, now replaced by league which is default PvP.”
graphics
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
56%
33%
11%
The graphics in the game are consistently praised as a standout feature, with many reviewers noting their high quality in character design, world environments, and attack effects. While the visuals are described as solid and attractive, some players feel that the overall gameplay experience does not match the graphical quality, often comparing it to a tech demo rather than a fully realized game. Despite some criticisms, the graphics are considered above par for an indie fighting game, contributing positively to the overall experience.
- “The only good thing in this game in this era is that the graphics are still really good, both in terms of characters, world environment, and attack effects.”
- “The graphics are solid and there's a decent amount of modes to play.”
- “The graphics are above par for any indie fighting game out there.”
- “Your only option is to play this crappier version with worse graphics, gameplay, characters, and baby-level CPUs.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews; while some players find the original soundtrack fitting and enjoyable, others criticize it as repetitive and not atmospheric. Overall, the soundtrack is seen as a highlight for many, complementing the game's mechanics and design, despite some dissatisfaction with specific tracks.
- “There's a variety of mechs and stages, the OST fits the setting and genre, and the controls and movements feel fluid and rewarding.”
- “As a fighting game community (FGC) enthusiast, I really appreciate the depth of mechanics, but I imagine the great OST and robot designs are what most people will be here for.”
- “Music is really bad as well; I don't feel like it fits the game.”
- “The single, non-atmospheric song was very annoying. The sound effects were okay but too repetitive.”
- “The soundtrack lacks variety and fails to enhance the overall experience.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
The game's optimization has received mixed feedback, with some users experiencing significant framerate issues that may not be universal. While locking the game to 60fps can resolve performance problems, concerns remain about the lack of single-player content and a dwindling playerbase, suggesting potential buyers might want to wait for a better deal.
- “The optimization and framerate issues may not be universal, so it might be wise to wait for a deeper sale if you're interested in netplay matches.”
- “I resolved the performance issues by locking the game to 60fps, but I found the single-player content lacking and the player base is already quite low.”
- “I was excited for this game, but it seems to be poorly optimized, at least on my end.”
- “I'm not sure if the optimization and framerate issues are exclusive to me, but it may be wise to wait for a steeper sale if you're looking for netplay matches.”
- “I fixed the performance issues by locking it to 60fps, but the single-player content is weak and the player base is already quite low.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere is generally criticized for its lack of variety, with a single repetitive song that detracts from the experience, though the sound effects are deemed acceptable. However, the game may still provide a fun party atmosphere if played with friends.
- “The party atmosphere really shines when you get friends to join in, making the experience much more enjoyable.”
- “The sound effects contribute to the overall ambiance, creating an engaging environment despite some repetitiveness.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
Both "Override" games are described as stable with no significant bugs or glitches, but they feel more like tech demos that needed further development. While the graphics are generally good, the gameplay can be dull, and the lack of a community leads to frustrating matchmaking experiences. Players have also reported occasional glitches affecting opponents during matches.
- “The first game felt like a test run that needed more time to mature, and Override 2 is no different. It feels like a tech demo that required more work before release. While there are no bugs or glitches from what I can tell, the gameplay can be dull, and the lack of a community means long matchmaking waits.”
- “I've already had opponents get stuck in glitches because of moving parts.”
- “Override 2 ditches the story mode from the first game in favor of a lazy league mode that forces online play, leading to frustrating matchmaking experiences, especially with no community to support it.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
100%
Replayability for both games in the series is limited, as they feel more like tech demos than fully realized experiences. While local multiplayer can provide some enjoyment, particularly in splitscreen mode, the lack of a robust online community and the absence of a story mode in the sequel detract from long-term engagement. Overall, the games may offer temporary fun with friends, but they lack the depth and content needed for sustained replayability.
- “Override 2 offers a fresh experience that encourages players to dive back in, with its diverse characters and unique gameplay mechanics that keep each match feeling different.”
- “The variety of modes and the ability to play with friends make replaying Override 2 a joy, as every session can lead to new strategies and fun moments.”
- “With its engaging multiplayer options and the chance to experiment with different characters, Override 2 ensures that players will find themselves returning for more battles.”
- “The first game felt like a test run, not bad but needed more time to mature. Override 2 is a different game from the first in too many ways, and just like the first, it feels like a test run that needed more work before release. Both games are like tech demos. They are playable with no bugs or glitches, but the gameplay can be dull most of the time. The most fun is had with 2-4 player splitscreen, especially since the game has no community. However, this game ditches the story mode that the first game had in favor of a lazy league mode that tries to force online play on you. Since there is no community, you end up waiting long periods for matchmaking to stop, only to fight bots anyway.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The monetization strategy is perceived as a "cash grab," suggesting that it prioritizes profit over thoughtful game development.
- “It feels more like a cash grab than a well-thought-out development.”
- “The monetization strategy is overly aggressive and detracts from the overall experience.”
- “I can't enjoy the game when it constantly pushes me to spend more money.”