Nevermore-W: Idle Immortal RPG

89%
Game Brain Score Based on 6,075 reviews
  • graphics
  • gameplay
  • monetization
Nevermore-W: Idle Immortal RPG Game Cover
View game
Get on Play Store

Nevermore-W: Idle Immortal RPG is a Role Playing game with a good story, splendid gameplay, and wonderful graphics. However, the game is filled with bugs and has too much advertisement. The game boasts of epic AAA quality, cool skill effects, smooth action fighting, and a strong visual sense, creating an immersive gaming experience.

  • Phone
  • Android
  • Mobile Platform
  • Tablet
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

89%
Audience ScoreBased on 6,075 reviews
graphics143 positive mentions
monetization34 negative mentions
  • The game features vibrant graphics and engaging gameplay that keeps players entertained.
  • It offers a variety of activities and events, making it a good time killer for idle game enthusiasts.
  • Players have reported that it is possible to progress without spending money, although spending can enhance the experience.
  • The game heavily promotes in-app purchases, creating a pay-to-win environment that frustrates free-to-play users.
  • Many players have experienced technical issues, including lag, crashes, and problems with logging in or making purchases.
  • The game often requires players to give a 5-star rating before they even start playing, which raises concerns about the authenticity of its reviews.
  • graphics190 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising them as "amazing," "great," or "beautiful," highlighting the character design and overall visual appeal. However, some users express disappointment, citing issues like outdated graphics, bugs, and inconsistencies between in-game visuals and advertisements. Overall, while the graphics are often described as a strong point, there are notable criticisms regarding quality and performance.

    • “Outstanding graphics and gameplay.”
    • “The graphics are amazing!”
    • “Great game, amazing graphics, much better than what I imagined.”
    • “Graphics are so bad it felt like I was playing an interactive ad.”
    • “Graphics look like bad claymation style monsters and all events require a lot of money to participate in.”
    • “Game is bad in all kinds of ways, first of all it's an automatic game, meaning the 'gameplay' is pretty much just clicking the screen every now and then to progress through the game, graphics are very old, like 2017 old.”
  • gameplay52 mentions

    The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its fun elements, ease of mechanics, and variety of activities, while others criticize it for being overly reliant on auto-play and in-game purchases. Many users feel that the gameplay does not match the promotional materials, describing it as confusing and lacking a proper tutorial. Overall, while some find it enjoyable and engaging, others express disappointment due to its monetization strategies and gameplay structure.

    • “Normally I don't review games, but this one needed a review. First off, what a fantastic game! Unlike other games like this, you are not forced to spend money to progress quicker. With this one, you can be a free player and still be as strong as the top players. I love the gameplay, the graphics, and all the things you can do to make yourself stronger.”
    • “Really good fun, lots of things to do, daily challenges, and different events and gameplay elements.”
    • “Fantastic gameplay and lots of fun activities to keep you busy.”
    • “Auto play not real gameplay.”
    • “Game is bad in all kinds of ways, first of all it's an automatic game, meaning the 'gameplay' is pretty much just clicking the screen every now and then to progress through the game, graphics very old, like 2017 old.”
    • “Gameplay is nothing like the ads.”
  • monetization35 mentions

    The monetization aspect of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users labeling it a "cash grab" due to excessive in-app purchases and misleading advertisements. Players express frustration over the prevalence of ads, the lack of meaningful free content, and the pressure to spend money to enjoy the game fully. Overall, the game's monetization strategy is seen as exploitative, detracting from the overall experience.

    • “Really it's just a typical cash grab Chinese mobile game.”
    • “No free summons, very bad gameplay, overflowing with in-game purchases, it is literally begging you for money.”
    • “Changing review, since this game is a cash grab, all events are for pay-to-play players, none are for free-to-play players. I'm a paying player but still find the overall pricing a wallet scam.”
  • story34 mentions

    The reviews indicate a significant divide in player experiences regarding the game's story. Many users express frustration over the lack of a coherent narrative, describing it as chaotic and disjointed, with no clear instructions or engaging storyline. Conversely, a smaller group appreciates the graphics and claims to enjoy the story, suggesting that while some players find it compelling, the overall presentation and accessibility of the narrative need substantial improvement.

    • “I just started but it has some great graphics, storyline, and it seems easy to follow.”
    • “Fantastic story, characters you just have to play it 5*'s from me!”
    • “Easy to learn, great graphics, amazing storyline, good job.”
    • “Absolutely no tutorial or any hints of what the story is about. It's just a mashup of so much stuff happening on the screen that it's so confusing on what is needed to be done. This game could have so much potential because it's slightly different from all the others, but there was just too much happening at the same time and there needs to be an update where there's actually a storyline.”
    • “There's no story whatsoever.”
    • “The screen is overcrowded, no story, and very chaotic.”
  • stability11 mentions

    The game's stability is widely criticized, with users reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and crashes that hinder gameplay. Many players experience freezing issues and lag, detracting from the overall experience despite appreciating the graphics. Overall, the game is perceived as underdeveloped and in need of significant improvements to its stability.

    • “This new version has a lot of glitches and crashes every time it opens. Sometimes it gets stuck and has to restart again to play.”
    • “Game is buggy, underdeveloped, very poor quality, decades-old graphics, and extremely pay-to-win.”
    • “Tried to load the game but it won't let me; it just freezes on the page where it's supposed to say log on. Not happy.”
  • grinding6 mentions

    Reviews on grinding indicate a mixed experience; while some players appreciate the commitment and feel of grinding, others find that progress can significantly slow down without monetary investment. Overall, the game offers a blend of traditional grinding mechanics with a pace that some consider manageable, though it may still lead to frustration for those unwilling to pay for faster advancement.

    • “You can play for a day and then progress comes to a grinding halt unless you pay.”
    • “Not really, but grinding takes commitment.”
    • “You do not need to pay to advance, just heavy grinding.”
  • humor5 mentions

    Reviews on the humor aspect are mixed, with some users finding it hilarious and awarding high ratings, while others feel it falls flat. Overall, the humor seems to resonate well with certain players while leaving others unimpressed.

    • “Funny.”
    • “Gave it five stars for the humor in that.”
    • “Hilarious.”
    • “Not funny.”
    • “The jokes fell flat and felt forced.”
    • “I expected more clever humor, but it was mostly cringeworthy.”
  • character development4 mentions

    Reviews highlight strong character design and graphics, indicating that the visual aspects of the characters are well-received. However, there is limited commentary on the depth of character development within the story, suggesting that while the designs are appealing, the narrative may not fully explore character growth.

    • “It was a good game with good graphics, character design, and a compelling story.”
    • “I like the character designs.”
    • “Good game with very nice character designs that are great.”
  • optimization2 mentions

    Players praise the game's optimization, highlighting its smooth performance on mobile devices without buffering issues, contributing to an overall positive gaming experience.

    • “I especially like the optimization of the game too.”
    • “It's the most amazing game for mobile; it doesn't buffer and runs smoothly.”
  • music2 mentions

    The music in the game is generally well-received, with players appreciating its quality and contribution to the overall experience, alongside the impressive graphics and character design.

    • “I like this game; the graphics are amazing, and the music is quite good too.”
    • “Good graphics and excellent character; the music is good.”
  • replayability1 mentions

    The game has been criticized for its lack of replayability, with some users expressing a desire to delete it in favor of more engaging options.

    • “Will be deleting to make room for a more playable game.”
  • emotional1 mentions

    Users note that the emotional aspect of the game can be frustrating due to repetitive elements, which may particularly affect players who are emotionally invested or obsessive about aesthetics.

Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Nevermore-W: Idle Immortal RPG

Similar Games