Neighbors: Suburban Warfare

About

Neighbors: Suburban Warfare is a single player and multiplayer casual shooter game. It was developed by Invisible Walls and was released on April 17, 2025. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

NEIGHBORS: Suburban Warfare is a lighthearted, team-based PvP game about neighborhood warfare! Deploy traps and barricades to defend your own house. Use the tools from your surroundings to acquire crazy item to get the better of your Neighbors!

+17

Skip User Reviews

67%Audience ScoreBased on 727 reviews

gameplay26 positive mentions

stability10 negative mentions

Unique and original concept blending team-based PvP, base defense, and tactical gameplay with a humorous suburban theme.
Fun and chaotic gameplay experience, especially enjoyable with friends; diverse characters add strategic depth and variety.
Developers are active and responsive, regularly updating and improving the game based on community feedback.

Critically low player base causing long matchmaking times, frequent empty lobbies, and difficulty finding matches.
Severe balance issues and unbalanced mechanics leading to frustrating gameplay, with certain characters and strategies dominating.
Technical problems including hit registration issues, lag, crashes, poor optimization, and server instability harming playability.

gameplay
68 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
56%
6%
The gameplay offers a unique and engaging team-based, objective-focused experience with strategic depth and humor, blending accessible mechanics with meaningful tactical nuances. However, it suffers from balance issues, inconsistent mechanics, technical problems like lag and hit registration, and design choices such as player-hosted servers leading to gameplay variability. While the core concept is fun and promising, frequent abrupt updates and community concerns about mechanics and stability have hindered the overall experience.
- “The primary game mode, destruction, has a unique and interesting gameplay loop of juggling offense and defense.”
- “The gameplay pits two teams of up to four players against each other, each tasked with destroying the opponent’s home while defending their own.”
- “Despite its accessible mechanics, neighbors: suburban warfare offers meaningful depth for players who enjoy mastering team tactics.”
- “Switched to mouse and keyboard, and while I could see straight gameplay was stiff and flowless.”
- “So devs changed the whole core of the main game and left us with a terrible gameplay and went on vacation for pretty much a month.”
- “This game is just a disaster, they had lots of good potential and substance but they decided to dump it all down the drain with incompetency, a lot of the mechanics showcased in the trailers are literally gone or nerfed to nothing.”
humor
31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in this game is widely praised for its chaotic, slapstick, and cartoonish style that creates an entertaining and hilarious multiplayer experience, especially when playing with friends. Players appreciate the game's absurd antics, wild weapons, and unpredictable matches, which blend humor seamlessly with strategic gameplay. Despite minor balance and content issues, the comedic tone remains a standout feature that consistently generates laughter and fun.
- “Neighbors: Suburban Warfare is the chaotic, colorful, and utterly hilarious team-based PvP game we didn't know we needed.”
- “Its absolutely hilarious, fun for casuals, fun for sweats, fun for dads, fun for kids, fun for everyone.”
- “The game’s wild weapons, slapstick traps, and over-the-top antics make every round unpredictable and hilarious.”
graphics
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
61%
26%
13%
The game's graphics are widely praised for their charming, cartoonish art style reminiscent of the Plants vs. Zombies series, offering smooth visuals and a well-optimized experience. However, some users criticize the cosmetic design choices, feeling they stray from the game's original aesthetic and are negatively influenced by microtransactions. Overall, the graphics contribute positively to the game's unique and entertaining atmosphere, though opinions on style consistency vary.
- “The graphics are amazing, gameplay is a lot of fun.”
- “This game is really unique in how the matches flow, and is further benefited by its beautiful art style that is reminiscent to me of the 3D Plants vs Zombies games.”
- “Graphics, optimization, PvP, style are excellent.”
- “Bad graphics and honestly a waste of your time and money.”
- “Don't need a gaming computer to play anyways, it's a low graphic game.”
- “Jokingly we said it feels like we're playing the world of PvZ before the zombies took over, the graphics and feel of the game are far too similar; it even has a very distinct, extremely similar sound whenever you kill an enemy.”
stability
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from frequent bugs, glitches, and crashes, particularly in lobby creation and regional matchmaking, leading to frustrating stability issues. Despite these problems, the core gameplay remains engaging and fun, though the developers appear focused on new content rather than fixing existing stability and server issues. Players report long queue times, unbalanced gameplay, and occasional server bans, making the overall experience unstable and sometimes unplayable.
- “Can be buggy when trying to make a lobby and it has crashed multiple times, but it does have good content playing with friends and it is very engaging.”
- “The devs instead of fixing the glitches and player problems seem to instead be focusing on adding new things into the game such as a PvE mode, which sounds good until you realize how it does nothing to fix the problems that the game is currently facing.”
- “However if you do purchase it please make sure to set your region to your actual region in settings instead of having it set to "auto" as "auto" is a bit buggy and it puts you in a different region at the moment which makes it unplayable (I ended up leaving match because of that), not sure how often that happens but I thought it'd be worth noting in case someone experiences same difficulties.”
monetization
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
23%
44%
The monetization strategy is criticized for poor advertising coupled with a low initial price, creating doubts about the developers' approach. Players dislike the growing number of cosmetics with designs that clash with the game's aesthetic, viewing the microtransactions as unbalanced and detracting from the experience. Many suggest shifting to a free-to-play model with in-game purchases as the best chance for the game's survival and to attract fresh players.
- “This game has in-game purchases and was not free to play, showing a clear monetization strategy.”
- “For PvP games, you either have in-game purchases or you make it pay to play, not both, highlighting the chosen monetization approach.”
- “I think their only chance of survival is to make it free, especially when they already have in-game purchases available, suggesting a transition to a free-to-play model supported by microtransactions.”
- “The cosmetics, although a small and minor issue, still bother me and show that the developers have no idea what they are doing. They keep adding more cosmetics that stray away from the game's nice aesthetic and style. Allowing it to go free-to-play justifies keeping microtransactions and adding worse outfits and skins, instead of creating a simple challenge/reward system and outfits that fit the game's mood and tone. This level of Fortnite-style cash grabbing harms the game's appearance.”
- “For PvP games, you either have in-game purchases or you make it pay-to-play, not both.”
- “Not sure why the game hasn't been made free-to-play yet unless the intention is to just let the game die for a cash grab.”
optimization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
60%
The game’s optimization is generally strong, with excellent graphics and performance in PvP, but certain features—like particle effects when interacting with barbwire—cause significant performance issues. Additionally, the fixed XP rewards regardless of individual performance feel underwhelming and could benefit from being made more performance-based.
- “Graphics, optimization, PvP, style are excellent.”
- “Gameplay - don't walk over barbwires, unless you want to see particles fly... (this causes major performance issues; removing it would help optimization).”
- “If I had it my way, I would make XP rewards based on in-game performance.”
- “Not optimized.”
- “Gameplay - don't walk over barbwires, unless you want to see particles fly... This causes major performance issues. Remove it.”
- “Moreover, the match-end experience system does not reflect individual performance—whether a player achieves 50 kills or contributes significantly through assists or doing objectives, the XP reward remains fixed and underwhelming.”
emotional
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express mixed emotions, noting frustration with certain gameplay elements like particle effects causing performance issues, which detracts from the overall emotional experience.
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from limited replayability due to a scarcity of active lobbies and the inability to fill vacant team spots when players leave, resulting in diminished overall engagement.
- “Very few lobbies, if someone leaves that team spot is just gone for the game, and honestly little replay value.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story has a fun and promising concept with well-crafted maps and engaging characters, though some minor bugs and ability imbalances slightly affect the experience. Overall, it offers entertaining narrative elements despite small issues.
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Character development is praised for its great design and engaging customization, offering a variety of items to experiment with that enhance gameplay and exploration.
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Grinding in the game is intensive, requiring significant time investment to acquire character talents. This aspect may feel repetitive and time-consuming for some players.
- “Requires heavy grinding to get talents for characters.”

Skip Game Offers

Buy Neighbors: Suburban Warfare

15h Median play time

12h Average play time

2-26h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 7 analyzed playthroughs

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Neighbors: Suburban Warfare

63%5.1kreviews

Last Year

2019

Survival Strategy

82%6.3kreviews

Midnight Ghost Hunt

2024

Tactical Shooter

60%351reviews

7 Days Blood Moons

2024

Shooter

63%6.3kreviews

Propnight

2021

Survival Role Playing

64%532reviews

The Midnight Walkers

2026

Shooter

79%150.5kreviews

THE FINALS

2023

Tactical Shooter

62%4.8kreviews

Scavengers

2021

Open World Shooter

82%8.1kreviews

Due Process

2020

Tactical Shooter

71%2.3kreviews

Wild Assault

2025

Tactical Shooter

54%10kreviews

Dungeonborne

2024

Role Playing Shooter

More games like Neighbors: Suburban Warfare

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Neighbors: Suburban Warfare is a casual shooter game.

Neighbors: Suburban Warfare is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 12 hours playing Neighbors: Suburban Warfare.

Neighbors: Suburban Warfare was released on April 17, 2025.

Neighbors: Suburban Warfare was developed by Invisible Walls.

Neighbors: Suburban Warfare has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked Neighbors: Suburban Warfare for its gameplay but disliked it for its stability.

Neighbors: Suburban Warfare is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Last Year, Midnight Ghost Hunt, 7 Days Blood Moons, Propnight, The Midnight Walkers and others.

Neighbors: Suburban Warfare

Platforms

gameplay

humor

graphics

stability

monetization

optimization

emotional

replayability

story

character development

grinding

Buy Neighbors: Suburban Warfare