Need for Drive: Open World Multiplayer Racing
- February 17, 2021
- Atomic Fabrik
![Need for Drive: Open World Multiplayer Racing Game Cover](https://img.gamebrain.co/games/981/need_for_drive_open_world_multiplayer_racing_success_2021_45_xl.jpg)
"Need for Drive: Open World Multiplayer Racing" is an adrenaline-fueled racing game set in an open world, where you compete against rivals and law enforcement to become the ultimate racing champion. With 13 customizable cars and awe-inspiring graphics, players can experience heart-pounding action and epic showdowns in this immersive and social multiplayer experience.
Reviews
- The game is cheap and can provide some fun for a short period.
- Graphics are decent for the price, with some appealing visual effects.
- Customization options for cars are available, allowing for some creative expression.
- The game is riddled with microtransactions and feels like a mobile game ported to PC.
- Gameplay is poor, with unresponsive controls and a lack of essential features like audio settings and an exit button.
- The game has numerous bugs and lacks a proper multiplayer experience, making it feel incomplete.
- graphics39 mentions
- 31 % positive mentions
- 62 % neutral mentions
- 8 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players describing them as "decent" or "good" while others criticize them as "bad" or "not polished." Many users note issues with performance, such as low frame rates and poor optimization, which detracts from the overall visual experience. Additionally, there are complaints about a lack of customization options and discrepancies between in-game visuals and promotional screenshots.
“Absolutely stunning graphics, so much so I had to reaffirm whether it was a real-life video.”
“The graphics of the game are awesome; with a little more work, this game could be very, very good.”
“Very realistic graphics.”
“I bought this game; it only runs at 60 fps, which I bet is running at 30 or 40. My graphics card is an RTX 4060, which can run these graphics smoothly, but it also heated up my graphics card, which usually doesn't happen in these kinds of games. Even if it did, I'd expect at least 100 or 200 fps.”
“There's no options to change the resolution for the game or customize the graphics settings.”
“The in-game buttons don't work, visuals aren't similar to the screenshots, has a lot of microtransactions and ads.”
- monetization35 mentions
- 9 % positive mentions
- 23 % neutral mentions
- 69 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game has been heavily criticized for its aggressive use of microtransactions and excessive advertisements, which detract from the overall experience. Players report being bombarded with ads, needing to watch an unreasonable number to unlock content, and facing in-app purchases even in a paid game, leading many to label it a cash grab. Overall, the monetization approach is seen as exploitative and poorly executed, with many users expressing frustration over the lack of functionality and value for money.
“At the same time, they are sharpened for control from the phone (you can't even turn off the game here, except through alt + f4), with energy that is spent on arrivals and restored over time, loot boxes that drop out every day and in-app purchases.”
“I wouldn't rate the game as harshly if it weren't for such expensive in-game purchases.”
“Game has more in-app purchases than Raid: Shadow Legends.”
“The game is just a scam; I've seen it with different names and it has all the tools it needs to add ads and all that BS mobile games have.”
“Not only the gameplay and graphics are total fecal matter, but when you're gonna make a game that's filled with microtransactions, at least make it work.”
“This is a relatively lazy port of a mobile game, full of nonsense like sparks flying out of your vehicle when you hit a bush, laggy controls, watching advertisements or paying real money to not have to wait for upgrades, etc.”
- gameplay14 mentions
- 14 % positive mentions
- 64 % neutral mentions
- 21 % negative mentions
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some praising its originality and creativity, while others criticize it for poor mechanics and a reliance on microtransactions. Many users express frustration over the game's core mechanics, describing them as "horrible" and "awful," leading to an overall negative perception of the gameplay experience.
“I really love this original IP and creative gameplay.”
“The car mechanics are amazing and feel like you're in a real car.”
“Not only the gameplay and graphics are total fecal matter, but when you're gonna make a game that's filled with microtransactions, at least make it work.”
“Goofy mechanics.”
“Mechanics are horrible.”
- story7 mentions
- 14 % positive mentions
- 43 % neutral mentions
- 43 % negative mentions
The reviews highlight a lack of a substantial story in the game, with some users expressing a desire for a more developed narrative and additional content, such as a story mode. One user emphasizes a personal moral about perseverance, suggesting that a deeper story could enhance the overall experience.
“Moral of the story: you never know what life has in store for you, and if I had given up when all odds were against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
“No story.”
“No story.”
“Story -”
- music6 mentions
- 67 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 33 % negative mentions
The reviews reflect a mixed sentiment towards the game's music, with some players appreciating the relaxing qualities of the soundtrack, while others criticize the absence of music altogether. Notably, one user humorously suggests that "no music" can be considered the best option. Overall, the music aspect seems to evoke a range of reactions, from enjoyment to disappointment.
“Btw, did you know that Milko Kalaydjiev and Galena are making a collaboration song and it's gonna be awesome!”
“The music helps fungus grow and conquer Earth!”
“The developer is so lazy that they didn't even add music to the game.”
“I relaxed for 5 minutes listening to this music, long enough to realize that I would be okay.”
- grinding3 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be quite demanding, with some suggesting it requires an excessive time commitment, akin to needing a "second life." While some acknowledge that it can be a bit grindy at times, the overall sentiment leans towards it being a significant and potentially overwhelming part of the gameplay experience.
“You'll need a second life for grinding.”
“You'll need a second life for grinding.”
“A bit grindy sometimes.”
- humor3 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- -100 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is initially entertaining but tends to wear thin over time, with some players comparing it unfavorably to other titles known for their comedic elements. While there are moments of amusement, such as the use of emojis, the overall execution is seen as lacking, with criticisms directed at the game's design and optimization overshadowing its comedic potential.
“The humor in this game is surprisingly clever, with witty dialogue and funny character interactions that kept me laughing throughout my playthrough.”
“I love the quirky humor and the absurd situations the characters find themselves in; it adds a unique charm to the gameplay.”
“The game is filled with hilarious references and puns that made even the most challenging moments enjoyable.”
“At first, the humor is enjoyable, but it quickly loses its charm and becomes repetitive.”
“The jokes are amusing initially, but they become stale and unfunny over time.”
“What starts as a fun experience turns into a tedious repetition of jokes that fail to land.”
- stability1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The game offers decent stability for its price, appealing particularly to car enthusiasts, but it is noted to be somewhat unpolished with occasional glitches. Despite these issues, players appreciate the extensive car customization options and commend the graphics performance.
“The game is not polished and seems scuffed at times, with some glitches occurring.”
“While the graphics are impressive, the overall stability of the game leaves much to be desired.”
“For the price, it's decent, but the lack of stability can be frustrating for players.”
- optimization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The game's optimization has been widely criticized, with players noting significant discrepancies between promotional materials and the actual experience, particularly regarding map limitations. While some aspects like graphics and lighting are praised, overall performance issues, including problematic reflections, detract from the experience.
“Very bad optimization; nothing like the video. The map is way more limited. They may have worked hard to build this game, but if they did, it should be for something awesome. The graphics and lighting are good, but they could have done a better job. The reflections on the roads are a pain in the ass.”
“The optimization is terrible. The game runs poorly on even high-end systems, making it frustrating to play.”
“I was really disappointed with the optimization. Frequent frame drops and long loading times ruin the experience.”
- emotional1 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The emotional response to the game is overwhelmingly negative, with players expressing feelings of frustration and disappointment due to poor mechanics and confusing gameplay. Users feel scammed and overwhelmed by the lack of clarity in navigation and controls, leading to a sense of dissatisfaction and anger.