Skip to main content
MU: Dragon Havoc Game Cover

About

MU: Dragon Havoc is a single player role playing game. It received neutral reviews from players.

MU Summons, the Dragon Descends

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

58%
Audience ScoreBased on 434 reviews
graphics7 positive mentions
monetization9 negative mentions

  • The game brings back nostalgic feelings reminiscent of the original MU, with familiar graphics and gameplay elements.
  • Some players find the game fun and addictive, enjoying the auto-play features and the variety of classes available.
  • Despite its flaws, there are players who appreciate the game's potential and hope for future improvements.
  • The game is heavily pay-to-win, making it difficult for free-to-play players to compete, as significant advantages are given to those who spend money.
  • Many players report numerous bugs, crashes, and poor customer service, leading to frustration and dissatisfaction.
  • The user interface is often criticized for being unintuitive and difficult to navigate, with small text and cluttered screens.
  • graphics
    18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the retro style and animations, while others criticize them for being subpar and lacking polish. Many users express a desire for improvements, particularly in terms of clarity and overall quality, as they feel the visuals detract from the gameplay experience. Despite these criticisms, some players still find the game enjoyable and fun to play.

    • “I've been playing this game for 6 days and I can say that it is a very well-made game, love the retro-styled graphics <3.”
    • “Great graphics and super fun diverse classes.”
    • “The game is great and the graphics are amazing.”
    • “The visual graphics are not up to par to call the attention of the player and it can get pretty boring real quick.”
    • “It's a knockoff version and the graphics are not good.”
    • “It was terrible, first off the graphics were bad, it lagged.”
  • story
    13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect of the game is criticized for its lack of clarity and depth, leaving players confused about their objectives and motivations. Many users express frustration with the repetitive nature of missions and the game's pay-to-win mechanics, which detract from the overall experience. Overall, there is a strong desire for a more engaging and polished narrative to enhance gameplay.

    • “Confused but addicting... I'm kind of lost on the storyline and why I'm doing what I'm doing in the game. Even still, I can't seem to put the game down. I'm super new to it, with maybe an hour of playtime so far, so I'm not too far into it, but from what I've played, there's definitely room for major improvements, and then the game will be all that it should be.”
    • “It needs to be polished better... it needs a good story, and I want the shops in town to be like in PC MU.”
    • “Somehow, while having virtually zero environment and zero creativity beyond the story, this game will grab those that enjoy hack and slash RPGs.”
    • “Just got bored after realizing that there is a lack of variety in missions.”
    • “Somehow, while having virtually zero environment, zero creativity beyond the story, and an entirely hostile pay-to-win attitude, this game will grab those that enjoy hack and slash RPGs.”
    • “No story.”
  • gameplay
    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players noting significant differences from the visuals and mechanics they expected, including odd character mechanics and a heavy pay-to-win element. While some appreciate the modifications that enhance mobile play, many criticize the PvP balance and overall gameplay experience as lacking depth and becoming repetitive by higher levels. Overall, the game seems to fall short of expectations, with accusations of false advertising regarding its gameplay.

    • “The game is good, it is very representative of the original, with certain modifications that give it a little more gameplay.”
    • “All the mechanics are in a modern way but you've kept the important stuff.”
    • “Heavy play-to-win narrative; I do like how they changed some of the mechanics to make it at least somewhat mobile-friendly.”
    • “The character mechanics are weird; you have some type of resets, but it's not what you think. There are some strange demon-angel leveling points, and you can equip multiple armors at the same time.”
    • “The PvP is really bad, both in terms of mechanics and balance, and it just doesn't make sense.”
    • “By level 100-150, you start to notice the redundancies in gameplay.”
  • monetization
    10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has been heavily criticized for deceptive advertising practices, with many users feeling misled by the promotional content that does not accurately represent the game. Players report a heavy emphasis on pay-to-win mechanics and intrusive recharge ads, leading to a perception of the game as a scam. Overall, the monetization strategy has contributed to widespread dissatisfaction and frustration among users.

    • “Amazing game with autoplay and no ads.”
    • “Deceitful advertising.”
    • “This game has fake advertising, fake commitment, fake promise of fun, and is built by a team of scammers.”
    • “Graphics aren't good, classes are cool, it's slammed with recharge ads every login and it's very pay-to-win.”
  • humor
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is described as both hilariously addictive and irritating, creating a unique blend that keeps players engaged despite the frustrations. Players appreciate the competitive and amusing nature of the early game, although some criticize developers for prioritizing new server launches over attracting new players.

    • “Hilariously addictive and mind-warpingly irritating.”
    • “So funny”
  • optimization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game is reported to be poorly optimized for mobile devices, leading to a subpar experience for users on phones.

    • “Really not optimized for phones.”
    • “The game struggles to maintain a stable frame rate, even on high-end devices.”
    • “Loading times are excessively long, making the experience frustrating.”
  • music
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is noted for its consistency, echoing the original's themes, which some players appreciate despite the repetitive nature. While it surpasses many clones, there is a desire for a more distinct musical experience that aligns more closely with the original game.

    • “The music perfectly complements the gameplay, creating an immersive experience that keeps you engaged.”
    • “I love how the soundtrack evolves with the game, enhancing the emotional impact of each scene.”
    • “The variety of musical styles in the game adds depth and keeps the experience fresh and exciting.”
    • “The music is repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to stay engaged.”
    • “I found the soundtrack to be uninspired and forgettable, which detracted from the overall experience.”
    • “The same music plays on every level, leading to a monotonous atmosphere that doesn't enhance gameplay.”
  • stability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game generally offers an enjoyable experience, but users report occasional startup glitches that require a restart to resolve.

    • “Pretty cool game, but it glitches on startup sometimes and requires a restart.”
    • “The game crashes frequently, making it frustrating to play.”
    • “I experience constant lag and random disconnections, which ruin the overall experience.”
  • grinding
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players note that the game features significant grinding, particularly after level 100, where the presence of bots farming resources makes it nearly impossible to compete or progress. While some find the grind enjoyable, the overwhelming number of bots detracts from the experience.

    • “The game is full of bots farming all spots and killing everyone with multiple characters at the same time, so there's no chance of killing them or farming after level 100.”
    • “Cool game, but it's very grindy.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy MU: Dragon Havoc

23h Median play time
16h Average play time
1-30h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 2 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Games Like MU: Dragon Havoc
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

MU: Dragon Havoc is a role playing game.

MU: Dragon Havoc is available on Phone, Tablet, Android and Mobile Platform.

On average players spend around 16 hours playing MU: Dragon Havoc.

MU: Dragon Havoc was developed by 9RING.

MU: Dragon Havoc has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its story.

MU: Dragon Havoc is a single player game.

Similar games include Raider: Origin, Rebirth of Chaos: Eternal saga, Demon God, Dragon Trail 2: Fantasy World, MU Immortal and others.