MU: Dragon Adventure

About

"MU: Dragon Adventure" is a Role Playing Game that offers classic MU gameplay with innovative features. The game boasts wonderful visuals, but is accompanied by frequent ads that may disturb the gaming experience. Lots of grinding is required to progress, making it a time-intensive game for players.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

59%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,176 reviews

graphics22 positive mentions

monetization14 negative mentions

The game brings back nostalgic memories of the classic MU.
Good graphics and enjoyable gameplay.
The game is addictive and has a lot of potential.

The game is heavily pay-to-win, making it difficult for free-to-play players to compete.
There are numerous bugs, including a disconnection bug that ruins the experience.
Lack of an English version makes it hard for many players to understand the game.

graphics
38 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
58%
32%
11%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the nostalgic feel and quality, while others criticize them as outdated and low-quality. Many users express a desire for improvements, particularly in smoothness and overall visual appeal, indicating that while the game has potential, it falls short in the graphics department. Overall, the consensus suggests that enhancements are needed to meet modern standards and player expectations.
- “I played this game.. I am not that amazed by the free-to-play journey.. while the graphics and animations with the bosses are better than other MU games that I played.. I'll still recommend and promote this game to my friends.”
- “Very nice game, 100 graphics, game mechanics!”
- “Great game, great PvP, great graphics for a classic MU.”
- “And this game basically has graphics that are not that good and feel like an old style HTML game.”
- “Worst graphics I've ever seen. I did play the first version of this, but this one is the worst. Don't believe any ads on social media; they don't even work. Fake advertising, worst experience.”
- “Low quality graphics, gameplay, and poor overall UI.”
monetization
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
6%
88%
The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, with players highlighting overpriced in-game purchases and misleading advertisements that promise unrealistic features and rewards. Many users express frustration over false advertising, including claims of working codes and multi-language support that are not delivered, leading to a negative overall experience. The consensus is that the game's monetization tactics detract from enjoyment and trustworthiness, resulting in a poor reception.
- “Nostalgia with modern monetization.”
- “This game is just literally a cash grab.”
- “In-game purchases are overpriced.”
- “Cash grab game that stresses you out instead of having fun.”
story
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
25%
38%
Players express frustration with the game's story, citing a lack of coherence and engagement, as well as issues with quest completion and rewards. Many feel that the storyline is chaotic and poorly streamlined, leading to a disjointed experience that detracts from overall enjoyment. Additionally, the reliance on auto-quest features and the high cost of daily quests further diminish the narrative experience.
- “The storyline is engaging and keeps you invested in the characters and their journeys.”
- “I love how the narrative unfolds, with unexpected twists that make every quest feel meaningful.”
- “The world-building is impressive, creating a rich backdrop for the story that enhances the overall experience.”
- “There's no storyline being followed.”
- “Hope the developers streamline the storyline and side activities; it's really chaotic right now.”
- “Disappointed because the gift code is not working, and the quests are too boring and not enjoyable.”
grinding
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express mixed feelings about grinding in the game, noting that while it evokes nostalgic elements, it often feels unbalanced, particularly for free-to-play (F2P) users who struggle to compete against pay-to-win (P2W) players. Many feel that the grinding experience is rendered futile when new servers quickly become dominated by P2W players, limiting opportunities for F2P players to progress or obtain valuable items. Suggestions for improvement include enhancing drop rates during AFK grinding and addressing the competitive imbalance to make the grind more rewarding for all players.
- “There's no point in grinding every day when a player who pays can just kill you in a few seconds. I hope you improve the balance in this game.”
- “Grinding daily as a free-to-play player has no chance to compete.”
- “It just makes the grinding not worth it when you grind for many hours just for another server to open up, and then the current server you're playing in becomes dead in a few days.”
gameplay
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The gameplay experience is mixed, with some players expressing disappointment over the pay-to-play model, lack of PvP safety during boss events, and technical issues like bugs and lag. However, others appreciate the classic MU mechanics and innovative gameplay, praising the graphics and overall game design. The desire for a return to a more traditional gameplay style, with separate PvP areas, is a common theme among critiques.
- “Very nice game, 100 graphics, game mechanics!”
- “Classic MU, innovative gameplay!”
- “If you want the classic MU gameplay.”
- “It's a pay-to-play game, and most of the boss events are not PvP safe. I hope you can turn off PvP in some events like Kalima or ancient bosses. It's not enjoyable to play if everyone tries to kill you. I hope you can return to the old MU gameplay where PvP is in a different dungeon or something.”
- “Disappointed with the success rate, and there are bugs and lag. Aid is not working... overall gameplay is lacking, and I don't believe that.”
- “Low-quality graphics, gameplay, and poor overall UI.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability has been criticized due to numerous glitches and bugs, including issues with delayed clicks and inaccurate stats, which detract from the overall experience. Users express frustration over the lack of responses to these problems.
- “I love this game, but it needs to fix other bugs and glitches, like delayed clicks, issues with stats, and many more.”
- “No reply... too many glitches and bugs.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews indicate that the game's optimization is lacking, with players expressing frustration over performance issues and a perceived pay-to-win model that detracts from the overall experience.
- “The game is super pay-to-win and not optimized.”
- “Need more exciting game performance.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is perceived as somewhat cynical, with players feeling like non-spenders are treated as comedic side characters compared to those who invest heavily. This disparity creates a frustrating experience for free-to-play users, leading to a sense of futility in their efforts.