Mortos
- November 14, 2016
- C.L.
Get on Steam"Mortos" is a action-packed FPS game set in a post-apocalyptic world overrun by the undead. Players can choose to embark on the mission alone or team up with a friend in co-op mode. Whether you prefer multiplayer mayhem or a solo campaign, "Mortos" offers a variety of gameplay options to fit your preferred style. Your mission: eradicate the undead and reclaim the dying city.
PC
Windows
Reviews
- The game runs fine and has decent graphics for its price.
- There is potential for improvement as it is still in development.
- Some players find the plot engrossing despite the game's flaws.
- The game is criticized for being an asset flip with plagiarized content and lacking originality.
- Gameplay is severely flawed with broken AI, poor hit registration, and unresponsive controls.
- The developer has a history of harassing critics and manipulating reviews, leading to a toxic community.
- story4 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 25 % negative mentions
The game's story is described as engrossing, but overall interest from gamers has been low, leading to a perception of it as a lackluster success. While the graphics are decent, they do not seem to elevate the narrative experience significantly.
“Graphics are decent and the plot is engrossing.”
“Hardly a success story; gamers just weren't all that interested in the game.”
- gameplay4 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The gameplay has been widely criticized for being poor and lacking creativity, relying heavily on stock assets with minimal adjustments. Players report a frustrating experience, compounded by empty servers and a hostile community that punishes feedback or questions. Overall, many feel the game is not worth the investment.
“The gameplay is absolutely horrible; there are only stock assets present with a few minor adjustments. There is not really any creativity, and asking questions or giving any kind of feedback will get you slapped in the face and banned.”
“The game is not worth your money; bad gameplay and empty servers.”
- graphics4 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 25 % negative mentions
The graphics are generally considered decent, complementing an engrossing plot. However, players have noted significant issues in singleplayer mode, where gameplay is hindered by enemies being able to attack from distances that exceed the graphical visibility.
“Graphics are decent and the plot is engrossing.”
“Singleplayer: ridiculously unplayable, enemies take you down with few shots from farther than the graphics can show...”
- monetization2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -50 % neutral mentions
- 150 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized for being a cash grab, with accusations of plagiarism due to the lack of credit given to the original artists and developers of the assets used. This has led to concerns about the ethical implications of the game's financial model.
“The developers didn't credit any of the artists and real game developers who created the assets, so this is plagiarism, as well as a cash grab.”
“The monetization strategy feels exploitative, prioritizing profit over player experience.”
“It's frustrating to see so many paywalls in a game that could have been enjoyable without constant prompts to spend money.”
