Mortos
- November 14, 2016
- C.L.
Get on Steam"Mortos" is a action-packed FPS game set in a post-apocalyptic world overrun by the undead. Players can choose to embark on the mission alone or team up with a friend in co-op mode. Whether you prefer multiplayer mayhem or a solo campaign, "Mortos" offers a variety of gameplay options to fit your preferred style. Your mission: eradicate the undead and reclaim the dying city.
Reviews
- The game runs fine and has decent graphics for its price point.
- There is potential for improvement, and some players hope for future updates.
- The plot is engrossing, which may appeal to some players.
- The game is criticized for being an asset flip with minimal creativity and poor gameplay mechanics.
- The developer has a history of harassing and banning players who provide negative feedback.
- The game is incomplete, with many features missing and a lack of meaningful content.
- story2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- -50 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The story of the game is considered engrossing, but overall interest from gamers has been low, overshadowing its potential success. While the graphics are decent, they do not significantly enhance the narrative experience.
“The plot is engrossing and keeps you engaged throughout the game.”
“The story is well-crafted and offers a captivating experience.”
“Hardly a success story; gamers just weren't all that interested in the game.”
- gameplay2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The gameplay has been widely criticized for being poor and lacking creativity, relying heavily on stock assets with minimal adjustments. Players report a frustrating experience, compounded by empty servers and a hostile response to feedback or questions. Overall, many feel the game does not justify its cost.
“The gameplay is absolutely horrible; there are only stock assets present with a few minor adjustments. There is not really any creativity, and asking questions or giving any kind of feedback will get you slapped in the face and banned.”
“The game is not worth your money; bad gameplay and empty servers.”
- graphics2 mentions
- 50 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The graphics are considered decent, but they are overshadowed by gameplay issues, particularly in singleplayer mode where enemies can defeat players from distances that exceed the visual range. This disconnect detracts from the overall experience despite an engaging plot.
“The graphics are decent and the plot is engrossing.”
“Singleplayer: ridiculously unplayable, enemies take you down with few shots from farther than the graphics can show...”
- monetization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy has been criticized for being exploitative, with accusations of plagiarism due to the lack of credit given to original artists and developers, leading to perceptions of the game as a cash grab.
“The developers didn't credit any of the artists and real game developers who created the assets, which feels like plagiarism and a cash grab.”
“The monetization strategy is overly aggressive, making it difficult to enjoy the game without spending money.”
“It feels like the game is designed to push players into spending more, rather than providing a fair experience.”
