Monster Evo
- July 11, 2021
- Monster Game
The Player will play the role as the Pet Trainer, who can capture the wild Pets in the field and advance them to higher stats. The Upgrade system in this game is called “Evolve”, which will help the pets to learn new skills and obtain stronger BP!
Reviews
- The game is easy to start and can be fun and addictive for some players.
- There are helpful players in the game community, enhancing the experience.
- The game offers free vouchers, which is a nice feature compared to other browser-type games.
- The game is a blatant cash grab with heavy pay-to-win mechanics and a cluttered interface.
- Many assets and designs are copied from Pokémon, raising concerns about originality and copyright infringement.
- Gameplay is overly simplistic, lacking depth and strategy, making it feel more like a clicker than a true monster battler.
- monetization3 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The monetization of Monster Evo has been criticized as a blatant cash grab, with users labeling it a pay-to-win (P2W) mobile app poorly adapted for Steam. Reviewers express frustration over its lazy design and the exploitative practices of its developers, highlighting a lack of effort and ethical considerations in its release.
“Monster Evo was a pay-to-win/pay-to-play mobile app that's been dumped on Steam as a greedy cash grab from morally void mobile app developers.”
“This mobile app cash grab was so lazy and poorly done, it displayed in mobile phone 16:9 portrait mode even on PC.”
“Then there's the cash grab nastiness from mobile game peddlers like this one.”
- gameplay3 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 33 % neutral mentions
- 67 % negative mentions
The gameplay is criticized for being overly simplistic and akin to a clicker or idle game, lacking genuine interaction and depth. Players report a frustrating experience with a poorly designed interface and a heavy emphasis on monetization, requiring real money to progress. Overall, the gameplay is deemed unsatisfactory and exploitative.
“Gameplay consisted of basic screen tapping to pretend you're playing a Pokémon game, but really, it was just a clicker/idler, where you would quickly find you're time/paygated and must buy mobile peasant in-game currency with real-world money to progress.”
“There is no gameplay; the interface is unusable, and everything may be actually stolen... 'give us money'.”