Mighty Battles

About

Mighty Battles is a single player casual sport game. It was developed by Hothead Games and was released on November 15, 2017. It received positive reviews from players.

"Mighty Battles" is a fast-paced, action-packed 1v1 strategy game with delightful graphics and hilarious elements. Despite its splendid gameplay, the game is plagued by excessive advertisements and bugs, affecting the overall experience. Marketed as the #1 free tower defense shooting game, it offers intense duels and entertaining gameplay.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

87%

Audience ScoreBased on 9,286 reviews

graphics241 positive mentions

monetization67 negative mentions

The game has great graphics and engaging gameplay, making it fun to play.
It's addictive and offers a unique twist on the tower defense genre.
The ability to control your turret adds a layer of strategy that enhances the overall experience.

Matchmaking is heavily unbalanced, often pairing players with significantly higher-level opponents.
The game frequently crashes or freezes, especially during battles, leading to frustrating experiences.
The reliance on ads for rewards and the long wait times for chests can detract from the enjoyment of the game.

graphics
336 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
72%
22%
6%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the overall quality and artistic style, describing them as "great," "amazing," and "fantastic." However, several users express dissatisfaction with issues such as pixelation, lag, and the need for improvements, indicating that while the graphics are appealing, they often fall short of expectations and require optimization. Overall, the game's visuals are seen as a strong point, but there is a clear demand for enhancements to meet player standards.
- “Amazing graphics quality, really enjoyed this game app.”
- “The graphics are great!”
- “The gameplay is very well thought out, the game has its unique features, it's not very hard to get used to and the design, effects, and graphics are stupendous for a mobile game like this.”
- “Dont bother with this trash game, graphics are not what they show you in the store, they are trash.”
- “The graphics is bad... there is a lot of visible pixelation... please make it better.”
- “Very poorly optimised game, was very laggy and graphics could do with some improvements, all in all, not a bad concept just badly executed.”
gameplay
149 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
66%
30%
4%
The gameplay of the game is generally well-received, with many players praising its mechanics, graphics, and overall fun factor. However, issues such as matchmaking difficulties, server connection problems, and a perceived pay-to-win model have been highlighted as significant drawbacks. While the gameplay offers engaging and addictive experiences, some users feel it lacks depth and variety, leading to repetitive gameplay over time.
- “The gameplay is excellent, the digital graphics are simply made and understood.”
- “Amazing gameplay, easy control and amazing characters.”
- “Great gameplay, strategy and an overall time killer.”
- “They added a turret that completely ruined the gameplay.”
- “Update killed the gameplay, plus obnoxiously long ads deleted!”
- “The gameplay is stupidly boring too, just a worse tower defense in my honest opinion from what I can tell, the only way to level up units is to get them from chests, but those take so long to be available to open you're better off installing another app to wait it out.”
monetization
81 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
12%
83%
The monetization strategy of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players feeling overwhelmed by the excessive number of ads and microtransactions that hinder gameplay. Users report that watching ads often yields no rewards, leading to frustration and a perception of the game as a cash grab. While some players acknowledge the potential for enjoyment without spending money, the overall sentiment leans towards dissatisfaction with the ad-driven mechanics and the pressure to pay for in-game advantages.
- “Microtransactions seem prominent but not necessary, at least at medium levels of play.”
- “There are a bunch of microtransactions and loot boxes, but you can still have fun without paying a cent.”
- “I understand that in-game purchases need to exist because game developers need money to help them make better games and whatnot.”
- “It's a shame these money-hungry devs implement these features just for the quick cash grab.”
- “The game has a significant amount of pop-up ads for you to buy their expensive products.”
- “In summary, matchmaking is rigged to make you spend money; it pushes game offers in your face all the time, it's very much a pay-to-win game and it's riddled with ads for other pay-to-win games.”
stability
56 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
96%
The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with frequent reports of freezing, glitches, and connection issues that disrupt gameplay. Many players experience crashes during matches, leading to losses and frustration, particularly in higher divisions. While some users note improvements after updates, the overall sentiment indicates that the game remains plagued by bugs and stability problems, making it unreliable for consistent play.
- “The game runs great.”
- “Great for passing time... no glitches...”
- “Game freezes continuously and kicks you out.”
- “Too many glitches... can't even play one game without connection issues, sad it used to be a fun game.”
- “This game sucks, just another pay to win game, it freezes constantly and then when it unfreezes the battle is half over and my base is mostly destroyed.”
humor
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
95%
14%
The humor in the game is widely appreciated, with players highlighting the amusing characters and entertaining dynamics, particularly the duo of Richter and Dozer. While some reviews note that the graphics could be improved, the overall consensus is that the game is both fun and funny, making it an enjoyable experience for players.
- “Second point is... Richter and Dozer... what a funny duo.”
- “I love the game; it's fun and funny! 5 stars! ”
- “It's a funny war game, tanks coming in.”
- “It's like Clash Royale, but it is still really fun, not funny.”
- “The humor falls flat and feels forced throughout the game.”
- “I expected more laughs, but the jokes just didn't land.”
story
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
60%
20%
The story aspect of the game is largely criticized for its lack of depth and meaningful narrative, with many players expressing disappointment over the absence of a compelling storyline and the reliance on monetization through missions. While some users appreciate the graphics and the potential for engaging gameplay, they feel that the current mission structure and rewards are frustrating and unsatisfying, leading to a perception of the game as a money grab rather than a fulfilling experience. Overall, players are calling for a more developed story mode and balanced gameplay to enhance their experience.
- “Graphics not the best, but epic storytelling and violence.”
- “Needs a storyline.”
- “As long as you keep updating new and cool features like new troops, new maps, new missions, new game modes, it'll be a big hit.”
- “This game has no story or meaning; basically a waste of time. I would definitely not recommend it as a frequent gamer; this must be the worst game I have ever played.”
- “Long story short.”
- “This is just too disappointing as I wasted time doing that quest to get the promised gold.”
optimization
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
Overall, players express a need for improved optimization in various aspects of the game, including troop movement, matchmaking, and overall gameplay fluidity. While some users report smooth performance, others experience stuttering and loading issues that hinder their experience. Enhancements in graphics and additional daily rewards are also suggested to attract and retain players.
- “I was expecting better graphics and optimization.”
- “The matchmaking system needs some optimization.”
- “Some stuttering with game flow in addition to controls.”
- “Needs better optimization and smoother gameplay.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Reviews on the music aspect are mixed, with some users expressing a desire for more music in the game, while others enjoyed the menu music and theme song. Overall, there seems to be a call for an enhancement in the musical experience, particularly in terms of variety and engagement.
- “I really enjoyed the menu music.”
- “The theme song at the beginning reminds me of Pokémon.”
- “No music, please add music.”
- “But the theme song is Pokémon at the beginning... please make the searching for opponents faster.”
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
While the character designs are praised for their quality, the reviews do not provide significant insights into character development, focusing instead on gameplay accessibility and the absence of pay-to-win mechanics.
- “The character designs are great, and the gameplay is easy to pick up on without requiring payment to succeed.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is negatively impacted by technical issues, as players report being abruptly kicked off after interacting with the screen, which disrupts immersion and engagement.