Last Fiefdom

About

Last Fiefdom is a single player strategy game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Last Fiefdom is an intense multiplayer strategy game centered around epic siege battles for control of a royal kingdom. Players build and defend their fortresses while coordinating attacks to dominate rivals in massive, fast-paced warfare. Engage in tactical combat and form alliances to secure your place as the ultimate ruler.

Genres & Tags

Strategy

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

76%

Audience ScoreBased on 93 reviews

graphics3 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game offers a remarkably intuitive experience with engaging gameplay that keeps players entertained.
Great graphics and good play mechanics enhance the overall enjoyment of the game.
It's a fun and addictive game that serves as a good way to relax after work.

Many players have experienced issues with lost progress and connection errors after updates.
The game is criticized for being a re-skinned version of existing titles, lacking originality.
Advertising does not accurately represent the gameplay, leading to disappointment among players.

gameplay
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
The gameplay is characterized by its competitive nature, which keeps players engaged, though some reviewers note a lack of innovation, citing repetitive mechanics across different iterations of the game. While the graphics and play mechanics are praised, there are concerns about misleading advertising that does not accurately represent the actual gameplay experience.
- “Its competitive nature ensures engaging gameplay that keeps players on their toes.”
- “Great graphics and good play mechanics.”
- “If you want your gameplay to depend on other people's investments, pick this game.”
- “I've seen this game almost four times now, just with a different picture and a somewhat different approach to the gameplay, but in the end, nothing really is different...”
- “Advertising doesn't show any actual gameplay.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users criticize the monetization strategy for lacking transparency, as advertisements do not showcase actual gameplay, potentially misleading players about the game's content.
- “Advertising doesn't show any actual gameplay.”
- “The in-game purchases feel exploitative and are necessary to progress.”
- “The monetization model is overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending money.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The graphics of the game are consistently praised, with users highlighting their quality and visual appeal. Many reviews note that the graphics enhance the overall gaming experience, contributing to the game's fun and engaging mechanics.
- “Great graphics and good gameplay mechanics.”
- “Fun game with great graphics.”
- “Excellent game with good graphics.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story aspect of the game has received criticism for being unnecessary and detracting from the core gameplay experience, with some players expressing a desire for a more straightforward focus on combat rather than a complex narrative. Additionally, there are complaints about being unable to progress due to story-related obstacles.
- “I just want a game that has the type of fighting as advertised, but without the base building stuff and needless story.”
- “If I wanted story-driven games, I'd play on my computer.”
- “Rip off! I can't even proceed beyond the storyline.”