Skip to main content

Last Empire – War Z: Strategy

Last Empire – War Z: Strategy Game Cover
54%Game Brain Score
graphics, humor
stability, monetization
54% User Score Based on 1,180 reviews

Platforms

TabletPhoneiPadMobile PlatformiPhone
Last Empire – War Z: Strategy Game Cover

About

Last Empire – War Z: Strategy is a single player strategy game. It was developed by Interesting Game Network Limited and was released on December 4, 2015. It received neutral reviews from players.

Last Empire – War Z: Strategy is a zombie apocalypse-themed game where players build their empire, train a zombie army, and battle against other survivors from around the world. The game features real-time zombie battles on the world map, online events, and alliances with other players to fight enemies and defend against the walking dead. Gather resources to support your army and grow your empire in this survivor game.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

54%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,180 reviews
graphics19 positive mentions
stability47 negative mentions

  • The game is addictive and fun, providing a great way to connect with friends and players from around the world.
  • The graphics and gameplay mechanics are well-designed, making it an enjoyable experience for players.
  • The game has a strong community aspect, with many players forming alliances and friendships over the years.
  • The game has become increasingly pay-to-win, making it difficult for free-to-play players to compete effectively.
  • There are frequent bugs and glitches that disrupt gameplay, and customer support is often unresponsive to player issues.
  • The constant updates and changes can be overwhelming, leading to frustration among long-time players who feel their efforts are devalued.
  • stability
    47 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is heavily criticized, with users reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and freezing issues that significantly hinder gameplay. Many players express frustration over the lack of effective customer support and the developers' focus on monetization rather than fixing these persistent problems. While some acknowledge improvements over time, the overall sentiment is that the game remains unstable and plagued by technical issues.

    • “Horribly buggy for the past few weeks.”
    • “The biggest issues are the glitches that the game support refuses to fix, and right now when I log in it's locked up and I can't get it to do anything.”
    • “Game is buggy and rubbish; my castle is trapped in the war arena and has been all day, and as a result, I can't log on to my main castle because your game is not working.”
  • graphics
    27 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising their quality and design, while others criticize performance issues such as lag and glitches, particularly during battles. Many users express frustration over the game's graphical updates, which they feel have not improved the experience, and some note that the graphics do not match the expectations set by the game's size and complexity. Overall, while there are positive remarks about the visuals, concerns about technical performance and the impact on gameplay are prevalent.

    • “The graphics are amazing, fun to grow and kill people.”
    • “Fantastic graphic design, I love it.”
    • “Great graphics when you are in an active alliance; it's interesting upgrades, tasks, and wars.”
    • “The game doesn't have many graphical elements yet it lags a bit, and I have a very good phone.”
    • “It's a total waste of time and the graphics are really poor, leading to a bad game experience.”
    • “Now it's crappie with weird graphics updates that make the game so annoying.”
  • monetization
    13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has drawn significant criticism for being heavily skewed towards in-app purchases, particularly favoring players willing to spend large amounts of money. Users report an overwhelming presence of advertisements, which detracts from the gameplay experience, and express frustration over the lack of support for non-paying players, creating a divide between those who spend and those who do not. Overall, while the game is praised for its mechanics, the aggressive monetization tactics have led to dissatisfaction among the player base.

    • “Excellent war/strategy game, shame the money side of it (in-game purchases) creates such a divide between keen gamers and money players.”
    • “Some people say it's pay to play, but the stuff you get from the in-game purchases are what you buy if you don't want to slowly build.”
    • “Every login just shows you advertisements and pressures you to buy their packages.”
    • “If you don't spend a lot on in-app purchases, you will never be a top-tier player.”
    • “You guys have ruined this game with these in-game microtransactions, which give players a significant advantage over those who don't spend money. This has made the game feel worthless and pathetic.”
  • gameplay
    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is praised for its strategic mechanics and potential, but is marred by issues such as a focus on monetization over bug fixes, unbalanced competition between players, and a lack of customer support. Many users express frustration with the inclusion of unrelated features like farming and dating, which detract from the core gameplay experience. Overall, while the game has a solid foundation, significant improvements are needed to enhance fairness and enjoyment for all players.

    • “Love the mechanics of the game played in a few states.”
    • “It's a great game, and I love the strategic elements. I also want more focus on fighting gameplay; it should allow for more freedom in troop deployment and attacking, similar to Clash of Clans but even better, as this game has great potential and fame.”
    • “Great gameplay needs a replay feature for each battle. Being able to replay battles against zombies would make this even greater.”
    • “It appears that devs mainly pay attention to fixing bugs with new features which must be bought rather than fixing existing bugs in the gameplay to improve the game as a whole.”
    • “In-game gambling, and pay-to-win gameplay with deceptive odds and flat-out false information.”
    • “They add some nonsensical gameplay of farming, designing a beach, and dating a girl to upgrade attributes instead of focusing on balancing the game between heavy spenders and those players who want to chill and play this game.”
  • grinding
    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game tedious and unbalanced, as it has shifted towards a pay-to-win model, making it difficult for free players to compete. While the game offers a decent grind for casual play, many feel that the focus on resource farming and additional gameplay elements detracts from the overall experience, leading to boredom and frustration.

    • “Been playing it since it was first launched and I appreciate how much they've added to the game. The only problem is that it's now more of a pay-to-win model than before, where grinding was rewarded and paying was optional.”
    • “If you don't have money to spend, you will just be farming for resources forever instead of doing any fighting, while the paying players will just force weaker free players to quit the game.”
    • “You cannot compete with the big players who spend thousands of dollars a month, and so this game becomes nothing more than a farming simulator.”
  • humor
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is characterized by a mix of sarcasm and dark comedy, with players finding amusement in the developers' responses and the game's challenges. Users appreciate the funny remarks about the gaming experience, particularly in relation to monetization, while also acknowledging the game's intensity. Overall, the humor adds a layer of enjoyment amidst the frustrations of gameplay.

    • “Great game, need lots of patience, funny and heart-stopping when fighting ”
    • “You know what's funny and messed up about this game?”
    • “I'll see you devs in hell, laughing at all of you.”
  • music
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is generally appreciated for its engaging and relaxing qualities, with players enjoying the interactive elements, such as the music played by a character and its impact on gameplay. However, some users have expressed disappointment over issues with lost game data and the absence of a soundtrack or images related to the game. Overall, the music contributes positively to the gaming experience, providing an enjoyable backdrop to the challenges faced.

    • “I love this game because there is a man and his dog with speakers, and when you touch it, it will play music and the zombies will come.”
    • “The music sound of the world/state map was nice and relaxing.”
    • “Been on this game for years, but the songs are messed up. I had to start all over again and was highly disappointed that my games didn't transfer to the new phone. That's the only issue I have with this game. I love this game and keep playing it because it's exciting and challenging, helping me take my mind off things that hurt, like losing my family in real life.”
    • “Nothing about it, maybe disappearing on Google. No images of it, no soundtrack, nothing. If anyone can tell me where that game went, please do.”
  • story
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect of the game is engaging, featuring state wars and quests that players find enjoyable; however, some users express frustration with the imbalance created by players who spend significantly more money, leading to overwhelming challenges. There is also a desire for additional quests, particularly involving zombies, to enhance the narrative experience.

    • “The story is engaging and keeps you invested in the game.”
    • “The quests are fun and add depth to the overall narrative.”
    • “I really enjoy the game; I just wish there were more quests involving zombies.”
    • “The story felt disjointed and confusing, with random events that didn't connect well.”
    • “I found the narrative to be lacking depth and coherence, making it hard to stay engaged.”
    • “The plot twists seemed forced and left me feeling unsatisfied with the overall experience.”
  • replayability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviewers suggest that the game's replayability could be improved, particularly for players who may not want to spend additional money to enhance their experience.

    • “The game lacks the depth needed for meaningful replayability.”
    • “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to play again.”
    • “The limited choices and outcomes make replaying feel tedious rather than enjoyable.”
  • optimization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users have expressed significant frustration with the game's optimization, citing issues such as frequent freezing and prolonged loading times, which detract from the overall experience. Despite having no performance issues with other games on the same device, players are disappointed with the app's performance and suggest that adjustments, like enabling RAM optimization, may help alleviate some of these problems.

    • “Needless to say, my Google Play base isn't growing much. I logged into the game and under settings, I enabled RAM optimization. Maybe this will solve your problem?”
    • “I reduced my rating to 1 star due to performance issues. The update has been awful, horrible, and has made downloading a nightmare.”
    • “Needless to say, my Google Play ratings aren't improving. When I log into the game and go to settings, I enable RAM optimization, but it doesn't seem to solve the problem.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Last Empire – War Z: Strategy

Skip Games Like Last Empire – War Z: Strategy

Games Like Last Empire – War Z: Strategy

Clash of Kings ImageClash of Kings ImageClash of Kings Image
Guns of Glory: Lost Island ImageGuns of Glory: Lost Island ImageGuns of Glory: Lost Island Image
Battle Warship: Naval Empire ImageBattle Warship: Naval Empire ImageBattle Warship: Naval Empire Image
Clash of Kings:The West ImageClash of Kings:The West ImageClash of Kings:The West Image
March of Empires: War Games ImageMarch of Empires: War Games ImageMarch of Empires: War Games Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Last Empire – War Z: Strategy is a strategy game.

Last Empire – War Z: Strategy is available on Phone, iPad, iPhone, Tablet and others.

Last Empire – War Z: Strategy was released on December 4, 2015.

Last Empire – War Z: Strategy was developed by Interesting Game Network Limited.

Last Empire – War Z: Strategy has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its stability.

Last Empire – War Z: Strategy is a single player game.

Similar games include Clash of Kings, Guns of Glory: Lost Island, Battle Warship: Naval Empire, Clash of Kings:The West, March of Empires: War Games and others.