- September 20, 2023
- FunPlus International AG
King of Avalon
Platforms
About
King Arthur fell in battle, a victim of the betrayal of his nephew Mordred. Now, his body lies in a fortress on the sacred Isle of Avalon next to his powerful sword, Excalibur. It is only when Excalibur is raised again that a new king again will be crowned and the kingdom will be unified. The whole empire has been split into cities fighting each other. Many desire the power and magic of Excalibur …




- Visually stunning graphics and immersive medieval atmosphere.
- Rich in various gameplay mechanics and events, providing a diverse experience.
- Strong community engagement and competitive ranking opportunities.
- Heavy pay-to-win mechanics overshadow the gameplay experience.
- Repetitive and monotonous gameplay with a lack of strategic depth.
- Frequent bugs and performance issues, including lag and login problems.
gameplay
15 mentions Positive Neutral NegativeThe gameplay of King of Avalon is criticized for being repetitive and heavily reliant on pay-to-win mechanics, overshadowing its strategic elements and immersive world-building. While it offers a variety of mechanics, such as tower defense and resource gathering, many players find the experience lacks depth and is marred by unbalanced multiplayer interactions. Overall, the game is seen as a visually appealing but ultimately monotonous experience that fails to engage players in meaningful ways.
“This game is very fun and rich in various gameplay.”
“There are tons of different mechanics here which take hours to unlock.”
“1) A tower defense-like minigame where you fight waves of incoming groups of monsters, 2) upgrades of buildings, 3) some resource gathering, 4) tons of upgrades and abilities of heroes, 5) even a pet dragon which you need to feed, 6) a gazillion different looted items together with a lootbox mechanic, 7) online persistent world multiplayer and probably much more.”
“Drawing parallels to similar strategy games, King of Avalon excels in immersive world-building, but falls short in its monotonous gameplay and pay-to-win mechanics.”
“The gameplay is repetitive with a heavy pay-to-win aspect, overshadowing any strategic depth.”
“Oh yeah, also the core gameplay is just a worse version of Bad North; I wouldn't recommend this game for that.”