Janken Cards is a turn based card videogame, influenced by "Rock-Paper-Scissors". The rules are easy: there are 30 cards on the board and you must fill 3 columns with cards of the same suit in order to win. However, if nobody manages to fill 3 columns, then the one who scores the most points becomes the winner.
Original concept that combines elements of solitaire and rock-paper-scissors.
Colorful and appealing graphics, providing a refreshing break from pixel art.
Potential for fun, especially in a family setting, with engaging gameplay.
Heavy reliance on luck, making the game feel unbalanced and frustrating.
Awkward keyboard-only controls that detract from the overall experience.
Numerous bugs and glitches that significantly impact gameplay and user experience.
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, including numerous bugs and a frustrating user interface that hampers gameplay. While some players find the core experience enjoyable despite these flaws, the overall stability detracts from its longevity and replay value. Fixing these bugs is essential for improving the game's overall quality.
“The game is extremely buggy and seems to heavily favor the bots.”
“Right now, this game is really buggy in terms of dimensions when you need to adjust settings, as the buttons would be off the screen, making it difficult to adjust your options.”
“There is solid gameplay here with some cute avatars wrapped up in a rather hopeless and buggy UI and no longevity or replay value.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
The graphics are described as colorful and pleasant, offering a refreshing departure from typical pixel art, though they are not particularly remarkable. Some users noted the limitation of keyboard-only controls despite the game being a PC native card game. Overall, the visuals are considered decent but not standout.
“The cartoony graphics aren't awful; I've reviewed literally hundreds of retro pixel games, and seeing anything that isn't pixel art is refreshing.”
“The graphics are good, colorful, and nice, just like the music.”
“The graphics were nothing special.”
“The visuals felt outdated and lacked detail.”
“The art style was inconsistent and didn't match the game's theme.”
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
150%
The gameplay is generally solid and enjoyable, featuring cute avatars; however, it is marred by a buggy user interface and a lack of longevity or replay value, as players often need to restart the game after each match due to unresponsive controls.
“The gameplay is good, don't get me wrong - but you're going to have to restart the game after a single match since the continue button does not respond to keyboard or gamepad input.”
“There is solid gameplay here, but it is wrapped up in a rather hopeless and buggy UI, lacking longevity and replay value.”
“The gameplay feels repetitive and lacks depth, making it hard to stay engaged for long.”
“While the mechanics are interesting, the execution is flawed, leading to frustrating experiences during play.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game features solid gameplay and charming avatars, but suffers from a buggy user interface and lacks longevity, resulting in minimal replayability.
“There is solid gameplay here with some cute avatars wrapped up in a rather hopeless and buggy UI and no longevity or replay value.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The music in the game is praised for being vibrant and enjoyable, complementing the colorful graphics effectively.
“The music perfectly complements the vibrant graphics, creating an immersive experience.”
“The soundtrack is incredibly catchy and enhances the overall atmosphere of the game.”
“Each track is thoughtfully composed, making every moment in the game feel more engaging.”