IOSoccer

80%
Game Brain Score Based on 968 reviews
  • gameplay
  • graphics
  • humor
IOSoccer Game Cover
View game
Get on Steam

IOSoccer is a free non-commercial competitive third-person online multiplayer soccer game that offers unparalleled freedom in ball control and gameplay depth. Originally released 15 years ago under the full name International Online Soccer as a Half-Life mod, the game was later ported to the Source Engine and re-released in 2008. Since the last public release, the game’s code has been completely r…

  • PC
  • Windows
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

80%
Audience ScoreBased on 968 reviews
gameplay17 positive mentions
graphics11 negative mentions
  • The game is completely free to play with no microtransactions, making it accessible to everyone.
  • It offers a unique gameplay experience that emphasizes teamwork and skill, with a high skill ceiling that rewards practice and dedication.
  • The community is active and supportive, with many players willing to help newcomers learn the game.
  • The community can be toxic, with instances of racism and harassment reported, making it unwelcoming for some players.
  • The game suffers from technical issues, including lag and poor graphics, which can detract from the overall experience.
  • There is a steep learning curve, and new players may find it difficult to compete against more experienced players without proper guidance.
  • gameplay52 mentions

    The gameplay of this game is polarizing, with some players praising its depth, mechanics, and realistic soccer simulation, while others criticize its clunky controls, steep learning curve, and toxic community. Many reviews highlight the rewarding nature of mastering the game's mechanics, but also note that the initial experience can be frustrating due to unresponsive controls and a lack of intuitive gameplay. Overall, while the game offers a unique and engaging experience for dedicated players, it may deter newcomers due to its challenging mechanics and community issues.

    • “Totally skill-based gameplay that rewards individual ability, team coordination, and game sense.”
    • “Iosoccer is a gem of a game for football enthusiasts who crave a blend of arcade-style gameplay and strategic depth.”
    • “The gameplay is balanced as well; if you want to play as a goalkeeper, defender, midfielder, or attacker, every position is challenging but rewarding.”
    • “The graphics are terrible, the controls are clunky and unresponsive, and the gameplay is slow and boring.”
    • “The gameplay is trash; shooting and passing have been made unnecessarily hard, and it is nearly impossible to control the ball. Even simple running with the ball is painfully difficult.”
    • “Unwieldy and unintuitive mechanics that give the game a tremendous skill gap, community full of toxic players who take this game way too seriously for no reason.”
  • graphics31 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising vibrant and polished visuals while others criticize them as outdated and laggy. Many users note that despite the graphical limitations, the gameplay remains engaging, suggesting that the overall experience may outweigh visual shortcomings. However, a significant number of reviews highlight poor optimization and clunky controls, detracting from the visual appeal.

    • “Visually, iosoccer impresses with its vibrant and polished graphics.”
    • “Top game, so much better than FIFA, graphics are absolutely incredibly realistic and the movement is just mint.”
    • “Some of the best graphics in the modern age as military-grade technology was used to create them.”
    • “Graphics 2/10 and some randoms yelling”
    • “The graphics are terrible, the controls are clunky and unresponsive, and the gameplay is slow and boring.”
    • “Awful controls, terrible graphics and some proper bashes”
  • humor24 mentions

    The humor in the game is widely praised, with players finding it extremely funny due to its glitches, silly animations, and chaotic multiplayer interactions. Many reviews highlight the comedic value of voice chat and player antics, making it a fun experience, especially when played with friends. However, some users note that the humor can be hit-or-miss, with occasional inappropriate content detracting from the overall enjoyment.

    • “Hilarious game”
    • “Funny and the physics make it hilarious.”
    • “This game, this game, this game, it, it... it made me laugh so much that I never laughed so hard in my life.”
  • optimization5 mentions

    The game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with many users noting significant performance issues, particularly on lower-end PCs, leading to lag and poor gameplay experiences. While some players report smooth performance, others highlight severe problems like latency affecting gameplay mechanics, suggesting that the game requires better optimization and regular updates to improve overall performance.

    • “The game itself could be good if it was better optimized, updated now and then with new features and server optimization.”
    • “Runs smoothly on low-end PCs.”
    • “The game is also ultra unoptimized; just a difference of 20 ping makes you see the ball and players go back in time.”
    • “The current engine has bad optimization and the hitbox of a player is mostly ping-based.”
    • “Good football game, but it's not really well optimized. Even if you have a low-end PC, you might experience lag, which is disappointing compared to other games.”
  • story5 mentions

    The reviews indicate a mixed reception regarding the story aspect, with some users appreciating it while others find it lacking or nonexistent. Overall, the consensus suggests that the story may not be a strong point of the game.

    • “✅ no story”
    • “🔲 bad story”
    • “☐ story?”
  • stability5 mentions

    The game suffers from significant stability issues, including numerous game-breaking glitches, bugs, and screen-tearing, leading to a generally buggy experience. While some players acknowledge ongoing improvements, the overall consensus is that the game's stability is poor and can detract from the enjoyment.

    • “It's badly coded, especially in regards to a multitude of game-breaking glitches and bugs, particularly concerning screen tearing.”
    • “Very buggy, terrible sync.”
    • “The game is buggy as hell, but only a few people stand behind this game and are improving it.”
  • emotional4 mentions

    Players express a strong emotional connection to the game, with some experiencing intense feelings of joy and sadness, while others highlight the negative emotional impact of toxic interactions within the community. Overall, the game is seen as having significant emotional value, evoking both positive and negative experiences among its users.

    • “Lowkey, I cried so hard when I scored a goal.”
    • “This game holds a lot of emotional value for me, and I'm really excited to finally see it go public.”
  • music4 mentions

    The music in the game receives mixed to negative feedback, with some players enjoying specific songs played through the microphone, while others criticize the overall quality and volume of the sound, describing it as overwhelming and poorly integrated. Overall, many users express dissatisfaction with the music, labeling it as "trash" and a detriment to the gaming experience.

    • “Love hearing the Ngolo Kante song played on repeat down a MW2 sounding microphone!”
    • “I got kicked off a server for playing the Turtle Song in Persian through the mic.”
    • “The controls are a little strange, graphics are pretty bad to be honest, the sound/music and people screaming like you also hear in real life are way too loud and constant and feels not the way it should be.”
    • “Music is trash, controls are trash, graphics are trash, HUD is trash, everything about this game is bad.”
    • “I got kicked off a server for playing a Persian language turtle song through the mic.”
  • replayability3 mentions

    Users have mixed opinions on replayability, with some noting improvements over previous versions like eFootball 2022, while others rate the replay value very low, indicating a lack of engaging content to encourage repeated play. Overall, the consensus suggests that replayability is a significant concern for many players.

    • “This game offers incredible replayability, making it more enjoyable than eFootball 2022.”
    • “The balance between game time and replayability is impressive, providing a fresh experience each time.”
    • “Replay value: 1/10”
    • “5/15 game time / replayability”
    • “Already better than eFootball 2022 in replayability.”
  • monetization3 mentions

    The monetization model of the game is highly praised, as it is completely free with no in-game purchases or microtransactions, ensuring a player-friendly experience without any cash grabs.

    • “No cash grabs.”
    • “Completely free, no in-game purchases of any kind.”
    • “Free-to-play (no microtransactions).”
  • atmosphere2 mentions

    The game's atmosphere is highly praised for its detailed player models and immersive stadium environments, which effectively draw players into the action. Reviewers highlight the unique competitive atmosphere created by the presence of various teams and leagues, enhancing the overall experience.

    • “The player models are well-designed, and the stadiums are filled with detail, creating an immersive atmosphere that draws players into the action.”
    • “It's the most unique game I've ever played, with a great atmosphere on the competitive side, featuring teams and leagues.”
  • grinding1 mentions

    Players indicate that grinding in the game can be quite demanding, often requiring significant time investment or multiple attempts to progress effectively.

    • “Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding and keeps you engaged.”
    • “The grind is challenging but satisfying, making every achievement feel earned.”
    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “The grinding feels endless and tedious.”
    • “I spent hours grinding, and it felt like I made no progress.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy IOSoccer

Play time

226hMedian play time
152hAverage play time
3-300hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 2 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games