Incline

About

Praised by real racers, realistic physics recreate the experience of riding the world's fastest motorcycles. Race up to five players from around the world in real-time multiplayer, with bonuses awarded at the end of each session, and generous prizes after every race. Compare your progress against the best in the world on the online leaderboard. Pay for what you play with the innovative token syste…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

49%

Audience ScoreBased on 216 reviews

humor3 positive mentions

graphics7 negative mentions

The game is free to play, making it accessible for anyone to try.
It has potential for fun gameplay, especially when played with friends.
The physics and handling can be enjoyable once you get used to them.

The controls are clunky and difficult to manage, especially with mouse steering.
There are significant microtransactions that can hinder gameplay, requiring players to pay to continue racing.
The graphics are very basic and the track design is poor, leading to repetitive and frustrating gameplay.

graphics
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
22%
48%
30%
The graphics of the game have received largely negative feedback, with many users describing them as basic, outdated, and reminiscent of early console titles. While some players appreciate the game's realistic driving mechanics, they find the visual quality lacking, often comparing it unfavorably to other contemporary games. Despite the poor graphics, a few users express hope for improvements in future updates, acknowledging that the game is still in early access.
- “Very good graphics.”
- “Realistic driving and good graphics!”
- “Overall this game is fantastic, it mixes retro arcade-esque graphics with simulation controls, I just hope the dev doesn't destroy it for everyone.”
- “The graphics are very basic and not much detail.”
- “The graphics are dogshit for a game released in 2017 and the handling is terrible because you have to use your mouse to steer, which cannot be changed in the settings.”
- “Graphics suck as everything in the game seems to be ripped from a library of free video game assets.”
gameplay
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The gameplay is characterized by ultra-realistic mechanics, though opinions vary widely; some players appreciate the realism and turning mechanics, while others criticize the clunky controls, lack of engaging content, and poor graphics. Despite these issues, some users still find enjoyment in the game, indicating a mixed reception overall.
- “Ultra realistic mechanics.”
- “Very realistic gameplay; you can crash on a straight road.”
- “I really like the turning mechanics.”
- “Graphics are terrible, menus and UI are awful, and there's not much gameplay.”
- “Dumb game, dumb in-game currency, dumber mechanics.”
- “- Clunky and unsatisfying controls and mechanics.”
monetization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
The monetization model of the game features numerous microtransactions, which many players criticize as exploitative, especially given that it is a free-to-play title. Users express frustration over the inability to earn in-game currency, as they must spend real money to access tracks, leading to perceptions of it being a cash grab. Overall, the monetization strategy has contributed to predominantly negative reviews.
- “Microtransactions galore.”
- “Has microtransactions, but you can't buy anything.”
- “The developer clearly took the EA course in microtransactions.”
- “Worst cash grab attempt I've seen in a free-to-play game - you spend in-game cash to enter any track, and you don't have any option to earn more.”
- “There are microtransactions, but what could you expect? It's a free game.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The game's story is virtually non-existent, with players noting a lack of purpose beyond racing for monetary rewards, which are primarily used for car maintenance. The absence of a compelling narrative or motivation detracts from the overall experience, leading to mostly negative reviews.
- “The story is engaging and keeps you invested in the characters and their journeys.”
- “The narrative is well-crafted, with twists and turns that make every moment exciting.”
- “I was captivated by the depth of the story and how it intertwined with the gameplay.”
- “A free game with mostly negative reviews. I would not recommend it; there is no story and no real reason to race. Unless you have a controller, you can't change the steering controls, which are frustratingly limited.”
- “There is no actual purpose to play it; the lack of a story makes the racing feel pointless.”
- “The game feels empty and lacks any engaging narrative, leaving players without a reason to invest time in it.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is characterized as both genuinely funny and hilariously bad, with some players finding the poor execution amusing in its own right. Overall, it elicits a mix of laughter and amusement, often leaning into absurdity.
- “It's funny.”
- “Hilarious.”
- “Just hilariously bad... like so bad it's funny.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a strong emotional response to the game's mechanics, particularly the feeling of vulnerability and frustration when their bike unexpectedly loses traction, leading to crashes. This moment evokes a sense of tension and realism, heightening the overall emotional experience of the gameplay.
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players indicate that grinding in the game can be quite demanding, often requiring significant time investment or multiple attempts to progress effectively.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “The grinding feels endless and tedious.”
- “I spent hours grinding, and it felt like I made no progress.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game demonstrates excellent stability, with users reporting smooth performance and no significant issues.
- “The game runs smoothly without any crashes or glitches.”
- “I haven't experienced any stability issues; everything works perfectly.”
- “The performance is consistent, making for a seamless gaming experience.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Users express a desire for improved gameplay and aesthetics to enhance replayability, indicating that the current version lacks the engaging elements necessary for repeated playthroughs.
- “The game lacks any meaningful choices, making replayability feel pointless.”
- “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to go back and play it again.”
- “The lack of varied outcomes or different paths means replaying the game feels like a chore.”