Immortal Sword

About

Immortal Sword is a multiplayer casual role playing game. It received neutral reviews from players.

Fight In Endless Jianghu Dungeon

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

58%

Audience ScoreBased on 119 reviews

graphics4 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The graphics are beautiful and well-designed.
The music is great and adds to the overall experience.
The game has potential and can be enjoyable for casual players.

The game is heavily pay-to-win, making it difficult for free-to-play players to compete.
There are numerous bugs and crashes that hinder gameplay.
The storyline is lacking and updates are infrequent, leading to a stagnant experience.

story
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
43%
43%
The game's story is criticized for being minimal and lacking depth, with players questioning its existence and expressing disappointment in the repetitive auto-quest system that detracts from player agency. While the graphics are praised, the overall narrative experience is deemed poor, leaving players wanting more engaging content and side quests.
- “Good graphics but very poor story.”
- “This game is great to play with, but it also sucks because it's a P2P game and there's like nothing new in the storyline.”
- “Does it even have a story?”
- “The auto quest kind of sucks because you can't do what you need to do, like equipping or enhancing or leveling up skills.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising their beauty and detail, while others find them merely acceptable. Despite the visual appeal, issues such as crashes and a lack of character customization detract from the overall experience. Additionally, the gameplay mechanics and story have been criticized, leading to a somewhat disappointing impression overall.
- “The graphics are beautiful, and there's a lot of interesting things to do.”
- “Liked the graphics (though no real customization of character), and for a few days a free-to-play can keep vaguely in touch by putting in lots of hours.”
- “Graphics are amazing; I would give it more stars but have been unable to play because the game keeps crashing after I select my character.”
- “Graphics are okay, but the fight mechanics are a little iffy.”
- “I liked the graphics, though there is no real customization of the character. A free-to-play player can stay vaguely engaged for a few days by putting in a lot of hours, but the gameplay becomes boring.”
gameplay
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The gameplay is criticized for being largely automated and repetitive, with minimal skill required and a heavy emphasis on pay-to-win mechanics. While some users appreciate the class variety and graphics, many find the experience unoriginal and frustrating, leading to boredom and a sense of being scammed. Overall, the game lacks depth and meaningful engagement, making it difficult for free-to-play players to enjoy long-term.
- “The classes seem cool, and the gameplay offers a mix of auto and manual options, though it could use better explanations.”
- “The graphics are okay, but the fight mechanics could use some improvement.”
- “Hugely pay to win, crashes, repetitive gameplay, little skill involved, etc. No traditional 'farming' between tasks/events other than 'meditating', and pay-to-win can get better rates of experience.”
- “For a few days, a free-to-play player can keep vaguely in touch by putting in lots of hours, but the gameplay becomes boring.”
- “It's just a direct copy of other games, with the exact same interface, same world, and classes. It's just a money grabber with open server races and all the gacha mechanics on top. Don't play; I feel scammed and sad I can't get my money back.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
33%
The monetization in the game features in-game purchases that are presented at a reasonable rate, avoiding annoyance for players. However, there are significant concerns regarding misleading advertisements that do not accurately represent the game.
- “In-game purchases are presented at an average and acceptable rate, making them feel non-intrusive.”
- “The monetization model is fair and doesn't feel exploitative, allowing players to enjoy the game without constant pressure to spend.”
- “I appreciate that the game offers optional purchases that enhance the experience without being necessary to progress.”
- “Terrible that the ads for this game are all lies.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game is highly praised, with users consistently highlighting its quality and appeal.
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews indicate that the grinding aspect of the game is heavily criticized for being repetitive and lacking skill, with many players feeling that it leans towards a pay-to-win model. Additionally, the absence of traditional farming mechanics and reliance on meditation for experience further detracts from the overall experience, leading to frustration among users.
- “Hugely pay-to-win, crashes, repetitive gameplay, and little skill involved. There's no traditional 'farming' between tasks or events, other than 'meditating', and pay-to-win players can achieve a better rate of experience.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is plagued by significant stability issues, with frequent bugs and crashes reported by users.
- “Super buggy and crashing all the time.”