How To Survive: Third Person Standalone

52%
Game Brain Score Based on 371 reviews
  • graphics
  • gameplay
  • story
How To Survive: Third Person Standalone Game Cover
Starting at $2.61Buy now
Get on Steam

"How To Survive: Third Person Standalone" is a single-player survival game with a 3rd person view, presenting an immersive way to replay the original "How to Survive" zombie crafting adventure, featuring a distinctive swamp-chic armor set as a loyalty reward for previous survivors. Join Early Access and prepare to face the undead horde once again!

  • PC
  • Windows
Genres & TagsPlay Modes

Reviews

52%
Audience ScoreBased on 371 reviews
gameplay8 positive mentions
graphics11 negative mentions
  • The third-person perspective adds a new level of immersion and excitement to the gameplay.
  • The crafting system is enjoyable, allowing players to create various tools and weapons.
  • The game is entertaining for fans of the original, providing a familiar experience with a fresh viewpoint.
  • The game lacks multiplayer/co-op features, which were a highlight of the original.
  • Aiming and combat mechanics are clunky, making it difficult to hit moving targets.
  • The graphics and animations feel dated, and there are numerous bugs that detract from the overall experience.
  • graphics47 mentions

    The graphics of the game have received largely negative feedback, with many users describing them as outdated, poorly executed, and lacking customization options. While some players noted that the game runs smoothly on lower-end systems, the overall consensus is that the visuals are subpar, with issues like poor animations and graphical glitches detracting from the experience. A few reviews mentioned that the game is still enjoyable despite its graphical shortcomings, but many recommend seeking better alternatives.

    • “The graphics and quality are amazing as well, plus the controls are easy to master.”
    • “Lightweight third-person game with fairly decent graphics and interesting storylines and voice actors for all the NPCs; it is really fun to play.”
    • “A really fair price for a zombie apocalypse game with nice graphics and decent gameplay.”
    • “The graphics did not improve, and what looked like poo in the original game now looks like poo covered in dirty mud.”
    • “Graphics, for a graphic example... why on god's earth are tombstones overabundantly placed all over the first island landscape and have ridiculous name labels?”
    • “There are much better 3rd person games out there, and to top it off, this one has a horrendous graphics glitch that seems to happen frequently, the kind where weird images flash all over the screen constantly.”
  • gameplay42 mentions

    The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing its clunky mechanics and awkward controls, particularly when transitioning from 2D to 3D perspectives. While some appreciate the new camera angles and survival elements, others find the combat and movement disjointed and frustrating, often feeling like they are battling the game's mechanics rather than the enemies. Overall, the gameplay is seen as a step back from the original, with some redeeming qualities but significant room for improvement.

    • “The gameplay is surely entertaining, especially in 3rd person view.”
    • “A really fair price for a zombie apocalypse game with nice graphics and decent gameplay.”
    • “It has a lot to it for the price and the gameplay is smooth and fun.”
    • “But the graphics, loot (pickups), and game mechanics are a sh*t show!”
    • “The biggest obstacle to your survival is not the monsters, or the hunger & thirst as Kovack says, but the clumsy mechanics of the game.”
    • “Gameplay: movement, combat, and interaction all feel disconnected, floaty, and poorly timed.”
  • story27 mentions

    The story in this game is generally considered interesting but ultimately generic, with many players noting that it closely mirrors the original game's narrative. While some find the missions and setting entertaining, others express disappointment over the lack of new content and the presence of bugs that hinder gameplay. Overall, the story serves as a backdrop to the action, but it doesn't significantly enhance the experience for those familiar with the original.

    • “Lightweight third-person game with fairly decent graphics and interesting storylines and voice actors for all the NPCs; it is really fun to play.”
    • “The story, setting, crafting, and missions are all solid and entertaining.”
    • “+ interesting story”
    • “The story, island layout, quests, crafting, and generally everything in this game is exactly the same as the original, more or less.”
    • “It really didn't rope you in; if you know what I mean, but throw the same game and storyline and put it in third person and it kicks ass.”
    • “I thought there would be a new story, but it's the same story as the original.”
  • humor6 mentions

    The game incorporates a distinct sense of humor, particularly through the character Kovac, which adds a refreshing touch to the gameplay experience. Players appreciate the hilarious moments during tutorials and the amusing dialogues that echo the original game, making it stand out among similar titles. Additionally, features like the tombstone mechanic provide comedic relief, enhancing the overall enjoyment.

    • “There are moments that are hilarious and great during the instructions of how to do things.”
    • “It's recognizable among the endless hordes of similar titles thanks to some off-beat humor and despite being mindless fun, has quite a bit of content and challenge if you are up for the harder modes.”
    • “Plus the tombstone feature, to see where people died... that's too funny lol.”
  • stability5 mentions

    Overall, the game's stability is criticized for being quite buggy, with users reporting visual glitches, combat issues, and game-breaking bugs that hinder progress. While some players still enjoy the experience, the frequent technical problems detract significantly from the overall enjoyment.

    • “Still very buggy, but 10/10 would recommend.”
    • “No multiplayer, and buggy as hell, not a fun game... for now.”
    • “This game is really buggy; you can't continue the story due to a skills bug.”
  • optimization4 mentions

    The optimization of the game has received mixed feedback; while some users report smooth performance without crashes, others express frustration over limited graphical options and the need for better optimization to accommodate a wider range of hardware. Overall, there is a consensus that more optimization features would enhance the gaming experience.

    • “I have had no problems at the moment with performance and not had one single game crash yet.”
    • “I can't review the graphics or performance of the game, simply because I'm running it on a low-end laptop on the lowest resolution and low quality, but it runs smoothly based on that.”
    • “Horrible optimization”
    • “It's a great game, but it needs to have more options for optimization. All you can currently do is set the graphics to low and change the resolution.”
    • “I can't review the graphics or performance of the game, simply because I'm running it on a low-end laptop at the lowest resolution and quality, but it runs smoothly based on that.”
  • monetization2 mentions

    The monetization of the game has been criticized as a blatant cash grab, with users expressing strong discontent and advising against purchasing it.

    • “This game was just a cash grab. Don't ever buy it!”
    • “And naturally, the small ones are always in for an easy cash grab.”
  • replayability1 mentions

    Players find the game's replayability surprisingly high, with many enjoying multiple playthroughs using different characters, which enhances the overall experience.

    • “Overall, the game is very enjoyable. I've played through with all four characters, and the replayability is surprisingly high.”
  • grinding1 mentions

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious, leading to some frustration despite it being a minor complaint.

    • “Grinding feels like a never-ending chore that takes away from the enjoyment of the game.”
    • “The repetitive nature of grinding makes it feel more like a job than a fun experience.”
    • “I find the grinding to be excessively tedious, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
  • atmosphere1 mentions

    The atmosphere is described as fresh and innovative, offering a unique experience that sets it apart from traditional settings.

    • “The atmosphere is incredibly immersive, drawing you into the world like nothing I've experienced before.”
    • “Every sound and visual detail contributes to a hauntingly beautiful atmosphere that keeps you on edge.”
    • “The game's atmosphere is rich and layered, making every moment feel alive and filled with tension.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy How To Survive: Third Person Standalone

Play time

22hMedian play time
22hAverage play time
22-22hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Similar Games